176
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Relationship Between Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Science Teachers and Their Confidence in Content Knowledge

Pages 109-112 | Published online: 01 May 2014

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Çapa, Y. (2005). Factors influencing first-year teachers’ sense of efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177–192.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302.
  • De Laat, J., & Watters, J. (1995). Science teaching self-efficacy in a primary school: A case study. Research in Science Education, 25(4), 453–464.
  • Friedman, I. (2003). Self-efficacy and burn-out in teaching. The importance of interpersonal-relations efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 6(3), 191–215.
  • Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(3), 185–189.
  • Hakverdi, M., Gucum, B., & Korkmaz, H. (2007). Factors influencing pre-service science teachers’ perception of computer self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1). Retrieved from www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt
  • Halim, L., & Meerah, S (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical knowledge content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching, Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225.
  • Hoy, W., & Woolfolk, A. (1993). Teachers'sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 356–372.
  • Hoy, A. W. (2004, April). What do teachers need to know about self-efficacy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • McDonnough, J., McKelvey, S., Baski, A., & Lewis, D. (2004). Hands-on physical science for in-service teachers. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 7, 67–78.
  • Muwanga-Zake, J. W. F. (2001). Is science education in a crisis? Some of the problems in South Africa. Science in Africa, No. 2. [Available online at www.scienceinafrica.co/za/scicrisis.htm]
  • Nel, J. W. (2011). Report on mar-king: Physical science paper 2. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Basic Education.
  • Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (1990). Toward the development of an efficacy belief instrument for elementary teachers. Science Education, 74, 625–638.
  • Schiver, M. (1999). A comparison of middle and junior high science teachers’ level of efficacy, and knowledge of develop- mentally appropriate curriculum and instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 21–42.
  • Shulman, L. (1986) Those who understand to teach: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–22.
  • Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  • Taimalu, M., & Oim, O. (2005). Estonian teachers’ beliefs on teacher efficacy and influencing factors. Trames, 9(2), 177–191.
  • Tepner, O., & Dollny, S. (2012). Chemistry teachers’ content knowledge and its correlation to pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science learning and Citizenship. Part 12, Psillos, D., & Sperandeo, R. (pp. 203–208). Lyon, France: European Science Education Research Association.
  • Wu, S. C., & Chang, Y. L. (2006). Elementary teacher education and teacher efficacy toward mathematics and science. In J. Novotná H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & Stehlíková N. (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 417–424). Prague, Czech Republic: PME. 5–417.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.