Students' Personality Traits and Learning Approaches

References

• Adendorff, A. (1997). Etraversion, neuroticism and coping as variables in the burnout process: A pilot study using a population of childcare workers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Atheron, J. S. (2005). Learning and teaching: Deep and surface learning. Retrieved on 20 November 2011 from http://www.learningandteaching.info
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, A. L. (1988). Empirical research methods for the human sciences. Durban, South Africa: Butterworth.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawton, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, C., & Kathura, R. (1993). Fundamental of Social Statistics: An African perspective. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. J., & Nelson, L. J. (2006). The relationship between personality, approaches to learning and academic success in first-year psychology distance education students. Paper presented at HERDSA conference, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relationship between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Difference, 44, 1596–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Brits, E., & Viljoen, M. (2010). Personality traits and learning approaches: are they influencing the learning approaches? Journal for New Generation Sciences, 8, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23, 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Fergusen, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at University: deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Junior and Adult). London, England: Hodder & Stroughton.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Christopher, A., Garwood, J., & Martin, G. (2007). Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1563–1571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, W., & Melville, S. (2001). Research methodology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Landsdown, South Africa: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education, 19, 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoare, L. (2009). The relationship between personality and learning approach of a selected group of bridging programme students at a university of technology (Unpublished masters thesis). University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M. L. (2004). The relationship between Big Five personality traits, learning motivation and learning performance of the hospitality students in Taiwan. Asian Pacific Tourism Association Conference. Retrieved on 20 November 2011 from www.ntnu.rduc.tw/acad/docmeet
   Google Scholar
• Newble, D., & Clarke, R. M. (1986). The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in a problem-based medical school. Medical Education, 20, 267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngidi, D. P. (1998). Towards a model for determinants of occupational stress among teachers in KwaZulu-Natal (Unpublished thesis). University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ngidi, D. P. (2003). Student teacher anxieties related to practice teaching. South African Journal of Education, 23, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ngidi, D. P. (2009). Black educators’ resilience in teaching as a career. Journal of Educational Studies, 8, 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnaly, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Orlich, D. C. (1978). Designing sensible surveys. New York, NY: Redgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhem, J. (2009). Deep/Surface approaches to learning in higher education: A research update. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 21, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Roffe, L. (2005). Describing and predicting behaviour: The Big Five. Retrieved from http://.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/3/25/183037/595 on 20 November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shokri, O., Kadivar, P., Farzad, V., & Sangari, A. A. (2007). Role of personality traits and learning approaches on academic achievement of university students. Psychological Research, 9, 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Struwig, F. W., & Stead, G.B. (2001). Planning, designing and reporting research. Cape Town, South Africa: Maskew Miller Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & De Bruin, G. P. (2004). The construction of a South African five-factor personality questionnaire (Unpublished master's dissertation). Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approach to learning of Australiantertiary students. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2001). Does the Big Five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431–1446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2002). Thinking styles and the Big Five personality traits. Educational Psychology, 22, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2003). Does the Big Five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar