Multi-trait, multi-method talent assessment through a digital platform: Relationship with job performance

References

• Alwin, D. F. (1973). Approaches to the interpretation of relationships in the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Sociological Methodology, 5, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/270833
   Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54205-8
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2021). Virtual HRD’s Role in Crisis and the Post Covid-19 Professional Lifeworld: Accelerating Skills for Digital Transformation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 23(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422320973288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersin, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2019). New ways to gauge talent and potential. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 1–4. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/new-ways-to-gauge-talent-and-potential/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bester, M.S., & Stander, F.W. (2021). Strengthening the psychological contract through talent-enabled assessment journeys: An employee-experience guide. In M. Coetzee & A. Deas (Eds.). Redefining the Psychological Contract in the Digital Era (pp. 179–201). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Ladd, R. T. (2016). Assessment centers vs situational judgment tests: Longitudinal predictors of success. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 37, 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2014-0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boahin, P., & Hofman, W. A. (2014). Perceived effects of competency-based training on the acquisition of professional skills. International Journal of Educational Development, 36, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 372–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 PMID:13634291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Akhtar, R., Winsborough, D., & Sherman, R. A. (2017). The datafication of talent: How technology is advancing the science of human potential at work. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, M., & Kunst, R. M. (2021). On using predictive- ability tests in the selection of time-series prediction models: A Monte Carlo evaluation. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L. J., Johnson, T. M., Tomczak, D., Siemson, A., & Gonzalez, M. F. (2020). Game on! Exploring reactions to game-based selection assessments. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferketich, S. L., Figueredo, A. J., & Knapp, T. R. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. The multitrait–multimethod approach to construct validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140410 PMID:1891617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangani, N., McLean, G. N., & Braden, R. A. (2006). A competency-based human resource development strategy. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2006.tb00361.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowska, K., & Łupicka, A. (2017). Key competencies for Industry 4.0. Economics & Management Innovations, 1(1), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.26480/icemi.01.2017.250.253
   Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334 PMID:30083048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E. (2017). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.). Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, P. V., Dönni, M., & Lievens, F. (2018). A dual-process theory perspective to better understand judgments in assessment centers: The role of initial impressions for dimension ratings and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000333 PMID:30058812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanna, B. I., & van der Heijden, M. A. R. I. A. (2000). The development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. High Ability Studies, 11(1), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/713669175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. F., Barron, L. G., Rose, M. R., & Carretta, T. R. (2017). Validity of spatial ability tests for selection into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) career fields: The example of military aviation. In M. S. Khine (Ed.). Visual-spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 11–34). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F. M., Borkenau, P., & Penke, L. (2016). The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000087 PMID:26796983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron?. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lado, M., & Alonso, P. (2017). The Five-Factor model and job performance in low complexity jobs: A quantitative synthesis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organisaciones, 33(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, N., & Haque, M. M. (2020). A role of competency- based recruitment screening: a case study on Indian manufacturing unit. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.108919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marengo, A., & Pagano, A. (2020, October 28–30). Innovative Ways to Assess Soft-Skills: The in-Basket Game Online Experience [Paper presentation]. European Conference on e-Learning, Berlin, Germany. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473444551?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
   Google Scholar
• Muraki, E., & Engelhard Jr, G. (1985). Full-information item factor analysis: Applications of EAP scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saling, K. C., & Do, M. D. (2020). Leveraging People Analytics for an Adaptive Complex Talent Management System. Procedia Computer Science, 168, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.269
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human performance, 15(1-2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2002.9668091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I.-S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 100 Years. Fox School of Business Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffers, J. M., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Jacobs, E. A. (2020). Employability and innovative work behaviour in small and medium-sized enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11), 1439–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1407953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunnissen, M., & Van Arensbergen, P. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to talent: An empirical analysis of the definition of talent in Dutch academia. Personnel Review, 44, 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2013-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119422730
   Google Scholar
• Wingard, D. (2019). Data-driven automated decision-making in assessing employee performance and productivity: Designing and implementing workforce metrics and analytics. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 7(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM7220192
   Google Scholar