Defender self-efficacy and defender behaviour in school bullying of primary school pupils: The role of perceived responsibility and sex

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, S., Liu, S., Hong, X., Zheng, J., Jiao, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Belief in a just world and bullying defending behavior among adolescents: Roles of self-efficacy and responsibility. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03198-5
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. H., Yang, X. X., & Zhang, W. X. (2018). The Anti-bullying Program KiVa in Finland and Its Implications. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 9, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2920
   Google Scholar
• Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing A Reliable and Valid Measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wu, J., & Huang, Z. J. (2021). Task performance: Report on the study on social and emotional skills of Chinese adolescence(I). Journal of East China Normal University, 9(1), 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.21.rp031
   Google Scholar
• Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive by-standing behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q. (2021). Status and comparison of gender role development between Chinese and American sixth grade students. Chinese Journal of School Health, 42(10), 1540–1543. https://doi.org/10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.10.023
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2017). Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 43(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauf, R.-K., Eschenbeck, H., & Hock, M. (2018). Bystanders of bullying: Social-cognitive and affective reactions to school bullying and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-3
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, K.-L. K. (2009). Collectivistic conflict of Chinese in counseling conceptualization and therapeutic directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 967–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe, L. J., Della Cioppa, V., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social-ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. N., Dang, J. N., He, S. S., & Li, H. M. (2013). Shyness and Loneliness: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Self-efficacy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(11), 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01251
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Ran, G. M., Zhang. Q., & Hu, T. (2019). A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Self-efficacy and Mental Health with Chinese Samples. Psychological Development and Education, 35(6), 759-768. http://www.devpsy.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V35/I6/759
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in over-generalizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermaier, M., Fawzi, N., & Koch, T. (2016). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814563519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, V., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). New directions in research and practice addressing bullying: Focus on defending behavior. In D. J. Pepler & W. M. Craig (Eds), Understanding and addressing bullying: An international perspective (pp. 26–42). Author House.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive by-standing behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Particiant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Elmelid, R., Johansson, A., & Mellander, E. (2020). Standing up for the victim or supporting the bully? Bystander responses and their associations with moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy, and collective efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09549-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509357553
   Google Scholar
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, S. L., & Cashman, J. F. (1993). Task, domain, and general efficacy: A reexamination of the Self-efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 72(2), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. P., Niu, Y. B., Li, Q., Zhao, G. G., & Hong, F. (2021). The relationship among parent-child-conflict, perceived school climate and behavior of bullying roles in 12- to 16-year-old teenagers: The moderating effect of big - five personality. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 27(4), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2021.04.0007
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2016). The Influence Mechanism of Bystander’s Helping Intention in the Cyberbullying Situation. Central China Normal University. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201701&filename=1016272425.nh
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. J., & Ma, X. C. (2016). The basic characteristics of adolescents’ early bullying participation role and its relationship with peer network. Educational Science Research, 2, 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-718X.2016.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. X. (2023). The definition of bullying: From cross-cultural and developmental perspectives. Xinli Fazhan Yu Jiaoyu, 4, 1–9. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1608.B.20221229.1129.006.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. X., & Sun, Z. (2015). The relationship between the role of bullying participants and peer status and academic achievement of junior high school students. Chinese Journal of School Health, 36(9), 1405–1407. https://doi.org/10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2015.09.042
   Google Scholar