A dynamic approach to phonological assessment

References

• Bain B. A framework for dynamic assessment in phonology: Stimulability revisited. Clinics in Communication Disorders 1994; 4: 12–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bain B. A., Olswang L. B. Examining readiness for learning two-word utterances by children with specific expressive language impairment: Dynamic assessment validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995; 4: 81–92
   Google Scholar
• Bauman-Waengler J. Articulatory and phonological impairments: A clinical focus. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Budoff M. The validity of learning potential assessment. Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, C. S. Lidz. The Guilford Press, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Campione J. C., Brown A. L. Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, C. S. Lidz. The Guilford Press, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Carter E., Buck M. Prognostic testing for functional articulation disorders among children in the first grade. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1958; 22: 124–133
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar M. S. Prognostic value of imitative and auditory discrimination tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1961; 26: 342–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J. A. Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: S85–S100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. A., Elbert M., Dinnsen D. A. A functional analysis of phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 462–479
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J., Morrisette M., Hughes M., Rowland S. Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 215–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaspey A. M. Dynamic assessment in phonological disorders: The Scaffolding Scale of Stimulability. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 2006, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Glaspey A. M., Stoel-Gammon C. Stimulability as a measure of phonological change. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA, November, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Glaspey A. M., Stoel-Gammon C. Sensitivity to phonological change: Stimulability, intelligibility, and generalization measures. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA, November, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Glaspey A. M., Stoel-Gammon C. Dynamic assessment in phonological disorders: The Scaffolding Scale of Stimulability. Topics in Language Disorders 2005; 25: 220–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman R., Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe 2 Test of Articulation. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 2000
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B. The Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns. Pro-Ed/Interstate, Austin, TX 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B., Paden E. Targeting intelligible speech: A phonological approach to remediation. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1991
   Google Scholar
• Howell J., Dean E. Treating phonological disorders in children: Metaphon—Theory to practice2nd ed. Whurr, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Justice L. M. Evidence-based practice, response to intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2006; 37: 284–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisatsky T. J. The prognostic value of the Carter-buck Tests in measuring articulation skills of selected kindergarten children. Exceptional Children 1967; 34: 81–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz C. S. Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. The Guilford Press, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Lippke B. A., Dickey S. E., Selmar J. W., Soder A. L. The Photo Articulation Test3rd ed. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1997
   Google Scholar
• Lof G. L. Factors associated with speech-sound stimulability. Journal of Communication Disorders 1996; 29: 255–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio A. W., Elbert M., Forrest K. The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 347–363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milisen R. A rationale for articulation disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Monograph Supplement 1954; 4: 5–17
   Google Scholar
• Morrison J. A., Shriberg L. D. Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 259–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olswang L. B., Bain B. A. Monitoring phoneme acquisition for making treatment withdrawal decisions. Applied Linguistics 1986; 6: 17–37
   Google Scholar
• Peña E., Iglesias A., Lidz C. S. Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 10: 138–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrine S. Dynamic assessment of phonological stimulability: Construct validation of a cueing hierarchy. Idaho State University, PocatelloIdaho 1999, Unpublished master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Powell T. W., Elbert M., Dinnsen D. Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1318–1328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell T. W., Miccio A. W. Stimulability: A useful clinical tool. Journal of Communication Disorders 1996; 29: 237–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew S., Rafaat S., Martin M. Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 33–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott D. A., Milisen R. The effect of visual, auditory, and combined visual-auditory stimulation upon the speech responses of defective speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Monograph Supplement 1954; 4: 38–43
   Google Scholar
• Secord W. A. The traditional approach to treatment. Assessment and remediation of articulatory and phonological disorderssecond edition, N. A. Creaghead, P. W. Newman, W. A. Secord. Merrill, Columbus, OH 1989; 129–153
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L. D., Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 256–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L., Austin D., Lewis B., McSweeny J., Wilson D. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 708–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers R. K., Leiss R. N., Delp M. A., Gerber A. J., Fundrella D., Smith R. M., Revucky M. V., Ellis D., Haley V. A. Factors related to the effectiveness of articulation treatment for kindergarten, first, and second grade children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1967; 10: 428–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Dynamic assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002
   Google Scholar
• Velleman S. Making phonology functional. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Williams A. L. Speech disorders resource guide for preschool children. Singular Publishing, Clifton Park, NY 2000
   Google Scholar