Explaining Collective Occupations from a Human Relations Perspective: Bridging the Individual-Collective Dichotomy

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, R. M. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (3), 147–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.714077
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2007). AOTA's centennial vision and executive summary. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (6), 613–614. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.6.613
   Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2012). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Retrieved from http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/morals.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). Logic of practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, D. (2009). Making war and maintaining peace: Agency and the limits of morality in Kenya's Mau Mau War, 1952–60. APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1449054
   Google Scholar
• Brentano, F. (1966). The true and the evident, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. (2004). Introduction. In F. Engels (Ed.), The origin of the family, private property and the state 7–24. Chippendale, NSW: Resistance Books.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, S. (2006). All you need is ubuntu. BBC News Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.woven.ca/assets/Articles/ArticleBBC_Ubuntu_09-28-06.pdf on 08/12/2012
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C. H., & Baum, C. M. (2005). The complexity of human occupation. In C. H. Christiansen, C. M. Baum, & J. Bass-Haugen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and wellbeing, (3rd ed, pp. 2–23). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C., Clark, F., Kielhofner, G., Rogers, J., & Nelson, D. (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49 (10), 1015–1018. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.10.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. (1990). Explanation in physical theory. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 155–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, M., Molineux, M., & Supyk-Mellson, J. (2010). Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (3), 157–165. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. (2010). Are occupations ‘processes too complicated to explain’? What we can learn by trying. Journal of Occupational Science, 17 (4), 195–203. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686696
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13 (1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (2004). The origin of the family, private property and the state. Chippendale, NSW: Resistance Books. ( Original work published 1884)
   Google Scholar
• Fogelberg, D., & Frauwirth, S. (2010). A complexity science approach to occupation: Moving beyond the individual. Journal of Occupational Science, 17 (3), 131–139. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686687
   Google Scholar
• Fourie, P. J. (2011, June. Normative theory as a corner stone for media practice and policy: The case of ubuntuism. Paper presented at the 3rd International Biennial Conference of the African Association for Rhetoric. Cape Town, South Africa, .
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford, & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation, (pp. 152–162). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Guajardo, A., & Kronenberg, F. ( in press). Southern occupational therapies: Emerging identities, epistemologies, practices. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, R. (2001). Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (3rd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2009). Sacred texts: A skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76 (1), 6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2011). Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (1), 27–33. doi: 10.4276/030802211X12947686093602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselkuss, B. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation, Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7 (2), 58–67. doi:10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2003). Creating occupational practice: A multidisciplinary health focus. In G. Brown, S. A. Esdaile, & S. E. Ryan (Eds.), Becoming an advanced healthcare practitioner, (pp. 189–215). Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16 (3), 140–150. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
   Google Scholar
• Iwama, M. K. (2005). Situated meaning: An issue of culture, inclusion, and occupational therapy. In F. Kronenberg, S. S. Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders, (pp. 127–139). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquette, D. (2004). Brentano's concept of intentionality. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Brentano, (pp. 98–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (1997). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (2008). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G., & Burke, J. (1980). A model of human occupation, part one. Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34 (9), 572–581. doi:10.5014/ajot.34.9.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, J. (1990). In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 297–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. How do scientific explanations explain?
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford, & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation, (pp. 69–85). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2006). Political dimensions of occupation and the roles of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60 (6), 617–625. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.6.617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., Pollard, N., & Ramugondo, E. (2011). Introduction: Courage to dance politics. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders - Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices, (pp. 367–375). Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., Pollard, N., & Sakellariou, D. (2011). Occupational therapies without borders— Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation based practices, Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, A. (2011): A transactional view: Occupation as a means to create experiences that matter. Journal of Occupational Science, 18 (2), 131–138. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.575759
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. (1996). The Inaugural Address: Brentano's thesis. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volumes, 70, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. G. (1974). Aristotle's doctrine that man is a political animal. Hermes, 102. Bd., H. 3, 438–445.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. (1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42 (10), 633–641. doi:10.5014/ajot.42.10.633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. (1990). Truth and teology. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19 (4), 298–311. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., & Sakellariou, D. (Eds.). (2012). Politics of occupation-centred practice: Reflections on occupational engagement across cultures. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Punwar, A. J., & Peloquin, S. M. (2000). Occupational therapy: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, A. (1982). L. Peikoff (Ed.). Philosophy: Who needs it. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, K. D., Hocking, C. S., & Smythe, L. A. (2011). Exploring the meaning of occupation: The case for phenomenology. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78 (5), 303–310. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2011.78.5.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L., Dennhardt, S., Fok, D., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A., & Zur, B. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (1), 136–146. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
   Google Scholar
• Russell, E. (2008). Writing on the wall: The form, function and meaning of tagging. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (2), 87–97. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686614
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, K. (2004). Brentano's impact on twentieth-century philosophy. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Brentano, (pp. 277–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skorupski, J. (1990). Explanation and understanding in social science. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 119–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M. (1990). Explanation in biology. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 65–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sober, E. (1990). Let's razor Ockham's razor. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits, (pp. 73–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, F., & Roose, B. (2000). Pocket guide to treatment in occupational therapy, San Diego: Singular Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation, Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
   Google Scholar
• Tutu, D. (2011). Foreword 1. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders - Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices, (pp. ix–). Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Marle, K., & Cornell, D. H. (2005). Exploring ubuntu: Tentative reflections. African Human Rights Law Journal, 5 (2), 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (1997). Occupational deprivation and incarceration. Journal of Occupational Science, 4 (3), 126–130. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686429
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011). Participatory occupational justice framework: Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders - Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices, (pp. 65–85). Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1998). An occupational perspective of health, Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Zibi, S. (2012, December). Nkandla exposes corporate rot. Business Section. Mail & Guardian, 8.
   Google Scholar