Beyond Independence: Introducing Deweyan Philosophy to the Dialogue on Occupation and Independence

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, R. M., & Cutchin, M. P. (2013). Dewey's concepts of embodiment, growth and occupation: Extended bases for a transactional perspective. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 13–23). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002a). Broadening the construct of independence [Position Paper]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 660. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002b). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609–639. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association.2008 . Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy ,62, 625–683. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
   Google Scholar
• Asaba, E. (2008). Hashi-ire: Where occupation, chopsticks, and mental health intersect. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(2), 74–79. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686612
   Google Scholar
• Bergum, V. (2003). Relational pedagogy: Embodiment, improvisation, and interdependence. Nursing Philosophy, 4, 121–128. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769X.2003.00128.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boisvert, R. D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowsky, S., Musto, A., Suteu, K. A., MacKenzie, S., & Dennis, D. (2012). Independence: An analysis of a complex and core construct in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(4), 188–195. doi:10.4276/030802212X13336366278176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey: Nature and cooperative intelligence. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation: An introduction and rationale. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1980). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (vol. 9, pp. 2–370). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1916)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1981). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (vol. 1, pp. 2–326). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1925)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1983). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (vol. 14, pp. 2–230). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1922)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1984). The public and its problems. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (vol. 2, pp. 237–373). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1927)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1987). Liberalism and social action. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 vol. 11, pp. 2–65. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1935)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1988). Democracy and education in the world of today. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (vol. 13, pp. 294–303). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ( Original work published in 1938)
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. C., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• French, S. (1994). The disabled role. In. S. French (Ed.), On equal terms: Working with disabled people (pp. 47–60). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• French, S., & Swain, J. (2001). The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 734–754). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M., & Smith, R. (1989). Standing alone: Dependence, independence, and interdependence in the practice of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 23, 283–294. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.1989.tb00213.x
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, R. W. (2009). Reconstructing Dewey on power. Political Theory, 37(6), 780–807.10.1177/0090591709345454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. (1995). Multiculturalism in occupational therapy: A time for reflection on core values. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 172–175.10.1111/j.1440-1630.1995.tb01333.x
   Google Scholar
• Iwama, M. K., Thomson, N. A., & MacDonald, R. M. (2009). The Kawa model: The power of culturally responsive occupational therapy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 1125–1135. doi:10.1080/09638280902773711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayar, S., & Hocking, C. (2013). Navigating cultural spaces: A transactional perspective on immigration. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 81–94). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pickens, N. D., & Pizur-Barnekow, K. (2009). Co-occupation: Extending the dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 16, 151–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686656
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2009). Co-occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 203–207. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686663
   Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. (1999). Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society, 14(3), 353–367. doi:10.1080/09687599926190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. C. (1982). The spirit of independence: The evolution of a philosophy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 709–715. doi:10.5014/ajot.36.11.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L. (2010). Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 55–59.10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Whalley Hammell, K. (2009). Sacred texts: A skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 6–13.10.1177/000841740907600105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2000). Occupational deprivation: Global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5), 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Wilcock, A. A. (2000). Cultural relativism: Occupation and independence reconsidered. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 324–336.10.1177/000841740006700505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright-St Clair, V. A., & Smythe, E. A. (2013). Being occupied in the everyday. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 25–38). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., … Zemke, R. (1989). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. In J. A. Johnson & E. J. Yerxa (Eds.), Occupational science: The foundation for new models of practice (pp. 1–17). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar