2,202
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Feature Articles

Institutional Ethnography: Studying the Situated Nature of Human Occupation

, PhD (Swiss Paraplegic Research) , , PhD (Associate Professor) & , PhD (Associate Professor)

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (3), 147–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M., & Holquist, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bell, N. M., & Campbell, M. L. (2003). A child's death: Lessons from health care providers’ texts. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 30 (1), 113–127.
  • Campbell, M. L., & Gregor, F. M. (2004). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 23–37. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • de Montigny, G. (2007). Ethnomethodology for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 6 (1), 95–120. doi:10.1177/1473325007074168
  • DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2002). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate the ruling relations. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method 751–776. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate the ruling relations. In D. E. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice 15–44. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Dickie, V. A., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13 (1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
  • Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 152–162. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Gardiner, M. (2000). Critiques of everyday life. New York: Routledge.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Griffith, A. I. (1998). Insider/outsider: Epistemological privilege and mothering work. Human Studies, 21 (4), 361–376.10.1023/A:1005421211078
  • Hammell, K. W. (2009). Sacred texts: A skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76 (1), 6–13.10.1177/000841740907600105
  • Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16 (3), 140–150.10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
  • Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 54–68. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Jonsson, H. (2008). A new direction in the conceptualization and categorization of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (1), 3–8. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686601
  • Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2012). Understanding the discursive development of occupation: Historico-political perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 38–53. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2005). Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: An analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. Journal of Occupational Science, 12 (3), 149–160. doi:10.1080/14427591.2005.9686558
  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17 (1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 100–116. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science?In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation 8–22. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • McCoy, L. (2005). HIV-positive patients and the doctor-patient relationship: Perspectives from the margins. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (6), 791–806. doi:10.1177/1049732305276752
  • Molke, D. K. (2009). Outlining a critical ethos for historical work in occupational science and occupational therapy. Journal of Occupational Science, 16 (2), 75–84. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686646
  • Morgan, W. (2010). What, exactly, is occupational satisfaction?Journal of Occupational Science, 17 (4), 216–223. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686698
  • Ng, R. (1995). Multiculturalism as ideology: A textual analysis. In M. Campbell & A. Manicom (Eds.), Studies in the social organization of knowledge: Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations 35–48. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Persson, D., Erlandsson, L., Eklund, M., & Iwarsson, S. (2001). Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation: A tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8 (1), 7–18.10.1080/110381201300078447
  • Rankin, J. M., & Campbell, M. L. (2006). Managing to nurse: Inside Canada's health care reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Satka, M. E., & Skehill, C. (2011). Michel Foucault and Dorothy Smith in case file research. Qualitative Social Work, 11 (2), 191–205. doi:10.1177/1473325011400483
  • Shank, K., & Cutchin, M. (2010). Transactional occupations of older women aging-in-place: Negotiating change and meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 17 (1), 4–13. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686666
  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, D. E. (1997). Comment on Hekman's “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22 (2), 392–398.10.1086/495164
  • Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Smith, D. E. (2001). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7 (2), 159–198. doi:10.1080/10245280108523557
  • Smith, D. E. (2003). Making sense of what people do: A sociological perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 10 (1), 61–64. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686512
  • Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people: The gender lens series. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Smith, D. E. (2006). Incorporating texts into ethnographic practice. In D. E. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice 65–88. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Townsend, E. (1996). Institutional ethnography: A method for showing how the context shapes practice. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16 (3), 179–199.
  • Townsend, E., Langille, L., Ripley, D. (2003). Professional tensions in client-centered practice: Using institutional ethnography to generate understanding and transformation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 17–28.10.5014/ajot.57.1.17
  • Turner, S. M. (2003). Municipal planning, land development and environmental intervention: An institutional ethnography. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto.
  • Walker, G. (1995). Violence and the relations of ruling: Lessons from the battered women's movement. In M. Campbell & A. Manicom (Eds.), Studies in the social organization of knowledge. Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations 65–79. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Wylie, A. (2003). Why standpoint matters. In R. Figueroa & S. G. Harding (Eds.), Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology 26–48. New York: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.