Discourses of Participation in Work among Men and Women in Vocational Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• Allebeck, P., & Mastekaasa, A. (2004). Risk factors for sick leave - general studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32(63 suppl), 49–108. doi:10.1080/14034950410021853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149. doi:10.1177/0018726700539002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2012). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bricout, J. C., & Gray, D. B. (2006). Community receptivity: The ecology of disabled persons’ participation in the physical, political and social environments. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/15017410500335229
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism: London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol, M., De Jong, B. A., & Ward, C. D. (2002). On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation: A response. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(18), 1001–1004. doi:10.1080/09638280210151996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cote, D., & Coutu, M.-F. (2010). A critical review of gender issues in understanding prolonged disability related to musculoskeletal pain: How are they relevant to rehabilitation? Disability & Rehabilitation, 32(2), 87–102. doi:10.3109/09638280903026572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women's employment and the domestic division of labour. Work, Employment & Society, 19(2), 213–233. doi:10.1177/0950017005053168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale-Olsen, H., Nilsen, K. M., Schøne, P. (2011). Imitation, contagion, and exertion: Do colleagues’ sickness absence influence your absence behavior? ISF Working paper 2010: 010.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsaeter, A. L. (1998). Dual breadwinner societies: Provider models in the Scandinavian welfare states. Acta Sociologica, 41(1), 59–73. doi:10.1080/00016999850080221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fear, W. J. (2009). ‘Return to work’ revisited. Psychologist, 22(6), 502–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floderus, B., Hagman, M., Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., Marklund, S., & Wikman, A. (2012). Disability pension among young women in Sweden, with special emphasis on family structure: A dynamic cohort study. BMJ Open, 2(3). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. (1997). The influence of the social participation of people with disabilities. In C. Christiansen & C. M. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling, function and wellbeing (pp. 379–388). Thorofare: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Gannik, D. E. (2005). Social sygdomsteori: Et situationelt perspektiv. [Social theory of illness: A situated perspective]. Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Gjesdal, S., & Bratberg, E. (2002). The role of gender in long-term sickness absence and transition to permanent disability benefits. The European Journal of Public Health, 12(3), 180–186. doi:10.1093/eurpub/12.3.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1445–1460. doi:10.1080/09638280701625534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind. Working USA, 1(2), 21–29. doi:10.1111/j.1743-4580.1997.tb00019.x
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, K. (2004). If work doesn't work: How to enable occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 11(3), 125–134. doi:10.1080/14427591.2004.9686540
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, E., McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2005). Do men and women differ in their response to interdisciplinary chronic pain management? Pain, 114(1–2), 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldstad, R., & Lyngstad, J. (2011). Funksjonshemming og kjønnslikestilling - Arbeidsdeling hjemme i par med nedsatt funksjonsevne. [Disability and gender equality: Division of household work in disabled couples]. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 04, 492–524.
   Google Scholar
• Kvam, L., Eide, A. H., & Vik, K. (2013). Understanding experiences of participation among men and women with chronic musculoskeletal pain in vocational rehabilitation. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 45(2), 161–174. doi:10.3233/WOR-121534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, V., Rivard, M., & Mechakra-Tahiri, S. (2012). Gender differences in personal and work-related determinants of return-to-work following long-term disability: A 5-year cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(4), 522–531. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9366-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leira, A. (2002). Updating the “gender contract”? Childcare reforms in the Nordic countries in the 1990s. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 10(2), 81–89. doi:10.1080/080387402760262177
   Google Scholar
• Lidal, I. B., Huynh, T. K., & Biering-Sørensen, F. (2007). Return to work following spinal cord injury: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(17), 1341–1375. doi:10.1080/09638280701320839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedberg, G. M., Björk, M., & Hensing, G. (2010). Occupational therapists’ perceptions of gender: A focus group study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57(5), 331–338. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00856.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillefjell, M. (2008). Function and work ability following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain (Doctoral thesis). Available from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:124374/FULLTEXT02
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K., & Mager Stellman, J. (2006). Sex, gender and women's occupational health: The importance of considering mechanism. Environmental Research, 101(2), 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwachofi, A. K. (2009). Gender difference in access and intervention outcomes: The case for women with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31(9), 693–700. doi:10.1080/09638280802305929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. (2001). Mening, materialitet, makt: En innføring i diskursanalyse. [Meaning, materialization, power: An introduction to discourse analysis]. Bergen: Fagbokforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2004). What men and women value at work: Implications for workplace health. Gender Medicine, 1(2), 106–124. doi:10.1016/S1550-8579(04)80016-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pransky, G., Gatchel, R., Linton, S. J., & Loisel, P. (2005). Improving return to work research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 453–457. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8027-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radley, A. (1989). Style, discourse and constraint in adjustment to chronic illness. Sociology of Health & Illness, 11(3), 230–252. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11435222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L. (2005). Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: An analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. Journal of Occupational Science, 12(3), 149–160. doi:10.1080/14427591.2005.9686558
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, L., Segal, R., Polatajko, H., & Harburn, K. (2002). Understanding return to work behaviours: Promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(4), 185–195. doi:10.1080/09638580110066299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, O. (2004). The role of family policy institutions in explaining gender-role attitudes: A comparative multilevel analysis of thirteen industrialized countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(2), 107–123. doi:10.1177/0958928704042003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, L. J. (2011). The understanding of Norwegian women's sickness absence: Toward a holistic approach? NJSR - Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Strazdins, L., & Bammer, G. (2004). Women, work and musculoskeletal health. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 997–1005. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, M., & Beagan, B. (2006). Values concerning employment-related and family-related occupations: Perspectives of young Canadian male medical students. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(2), 117–125. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9726504
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, A., & Malterud, K. (2003). It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Social Science & Medicine, 57(8), 1409–1419. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00520-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck, G. (2005). Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, and future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2000). A discourse-dynamic approach to the study of subjectivity in health psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 547–570. doi:10.1177/0959354300104006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2003). Discourse analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winther Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (1999). Diskursanalyse som teori og metode. [Discourse analysis as theory and method]. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. E. (2010). Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(20), 1621–1632. doi:10.3109/09638281003611029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar