Justice, Difference, and the Capability to Function

REFERENCES

• Angell, A. M. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. (2013). Laying low: Fear and injustice for Latino immigrants to Smalltown, USA. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 342–356. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.799114
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braveman, B., & Bass-Haugen, J. D. (2009). From the Desks of the Guest Editors – Social justice and health disparities: An evolving discourse in occupational therapy research and intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 7–12. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.1.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braveman, B., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (2009). Social justice and resource utilization in a community-based organization: A case illustration of the role of the occupational therapist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 13–23. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Rappolt, S., & Gibson, B. E. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 431–442. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 152–162). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, D., Wilding, C., & Whiteford, G. (2011). Utopian visions/dystopian realities: Exploring practice and taking action to enable human rights and occupational justice in a hospital context. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(5), 378–385. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00967.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Iwama, M. K. (2012). Well-being and occupational rights: An imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(5), 385–394. doi:10.3109/11038128.2011.611821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2013). Book review. [Review of Health justice: An argument from the capabilities approach]. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.864222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2011). The influence of Western society's construction of a healthy daily life on the conceptualization of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(1), 62–80. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.566917
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Adding a political dimension to inquiry. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 169–181). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 373–388. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–63). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). The politics of participation: A critical occupational science analysis of social inclusion policy and entrenched disadvantage. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2009). Occupational identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 85–91. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686647
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Sakellariou, D., & Kronenberg, F. (2008). A political practice of occupational therapy. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2012). Intergenerational play within family: The case for occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 326–340. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.710166
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2013). Capability ethics. In H. LaFollette & I. Persson (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to ethical theory (2nd ed., pp. 412–432). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, 1, 197–220. Retrieved from http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/s/sen80.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R. L., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329–358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, D. (2002). The sociology of habit: The perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22S, 61S-69S.
   Google Scholar
• Thibeault, R. (2013). Occupational justice's intents and impacts: From personal choices to community consequences. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 245–256). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. A. (2012). Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 8–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639723
   Google Scholar
• Venkatapuram, S. (2011). Health justice: An argument from the capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities. Bioethics, 27(5), 271–279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01953.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2011). [Editorial]. From occupational deprivation to social inclusion: Retrospective insights. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(12), 545. doi:10.4276/030802211X13232584581290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–207). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011). Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders. Volume 2: Towards and ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being, and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 248–257. doi:10.1177/000841749806500501
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar