A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Uptake of Critical Perspectives in Occupational Science

REFERENCES

• Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatrudo, A. (2009). The nature of state. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Criminology and political theory (pp. 1–14). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(7), 1–12. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2012). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Asaba, E., & Jackson, J. (2011). Social ideologies embedded in everyday life: A narrative analysis about disability, identities, and occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(2), 139–152. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.579234
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. (2013). Laying low: Fear and injustice for Latino migrants to Smalltown, USA. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 342–356. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.799114
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2004). Claiming a critical public social science: Reconceptualizing and redeploying research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 298–309. doi:10.1177/1077800404263418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Deploying qualitative methods for critical social purposes. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope (pp. 53–72). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Ethics, research and critical social science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 81–90). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C., & Suto, M. (2008). Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (2010). Critical inquiry: The Marxist heritage. In M. Crotty (Ed.), The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process (pp. 112–130). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2009). Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. (1996). Craft production in Detroit: Spatial, temporal, and social relations of work in the home. Journal of Occupational Science, 3(2), 65–71. doi:10.1080/14427591.1996.9686409
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., & Frank, G. (1996). Artisan occupations in the global economy: A conceptual framework. Journal of Occupational Science, 3(2), 45–55. doi:10.1080/14427591.1996.9686407
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., ... Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(35). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fine, M., Weis, L., Wessen, S., & Wong, L. (2003). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 167–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, K. (2010). Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: An example using critical interpretive synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(1), 201–217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05173.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: History of sexuality (Vol. 2; R. Hurtley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (1996). Crafts production and resistance to domination in the late 20th century. Journal of Occupational Science, 3(2), 56–64. doi:10.1080/14427591.1996.9686408
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2011). The 2010 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science: Occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 152–162). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. (2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer‐reviewed publications from 1996–2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 92–103. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J., Corden, A., & Parker, G. (2012). ‘Continuity of care’: A critical interpretive synthesis of how the concept was elaborated by a national research programme. Retrieved December 15, 2013 from https://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/URN%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10-1-112877/1532
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(140–150). doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–7). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (1999). Ageing, occupation and social engagement: Towards a lively later life. Journal of Occupational Science, 6(2), 61–67. doi:10.1080/14427591.1999.9686452
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S. (2013). Francophone immigrant integration and neoliberal governance: The paradoxical role of community organizations. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 326–341. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.803272
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., Dodson, B., & Magalhães, L. (2012). Expanding policy-based conceptualizations of ‘successful integration’: Negotiating integration through occupation following international migration. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(1), 6–22. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.717497
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1998a). Contemporary criticisms of role theory. Journal of Occupational Science, 5(2), 49–55. doi:10.1080/14427591.1998.9686433
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1998b). Is there a place for role theory in occupational science? Journal of Occupational Science, 5(2), 56–65. doi:10.1080/14427591.1998.9686434
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Jørgensen, & L. Phillips (Eds.), Discourse analysis as theory and method (pp. 60–95). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2011). The influence of Western society’s construction of a healthy daily life on the conceptualisation of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(1),62–80. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.566917
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2012). Understanding the discursive development of occupation: Historico-political perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 38–49). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kiepek, N., Phelan, S. K., & Magalhães, L. (2014). Introducing a critical analysis of the figured world of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 403–417. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.816998
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2003). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 433–488). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 303–342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P., & Steinberg, S. R. (2011). Critical pedagogy and qualitative research: Moving to the bricolage. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 163–178). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2005). Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: An analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. Journal of Occupational Science, 12(3), 149–160. doi:10.1080/14427591.2005.9686558
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 100–116). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). The 2012 Townsend Polatajko Lectureship: Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 373–388. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Dennhardt, S., Fok, D., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A., & Zur, B. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 136–146. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Huot, S., & Dennhardt, S. (2009). Shaping ideal places for retirement: Occupational possibilities within contemporary media. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(1), 18–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686637
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2004). Critical inquiry in qualitative research: Feminist and poststructural perspectives: Science “after truth”. In K. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 203–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtman, R. (1993). Essays in critical social theory: Toward a Marxist critique of liberal ideology (Vol. 1). San Francisco: San Francisco State University Series in Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 8–19). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Markoulakis, R., & Kirsh, B. (2013). Difficulties for university students with mental health problems: A critical interpretive synthesis. The Review of Higher Education, 37(1), 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesizing research evidence. In N. Fulup, P. Allend, A. Clarke & N. Black (Eds.), Studying the organisation and delivery of health services: Research methods (pp. 188–220). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molke, D. K. (2009). Outlining a critical ethos for historical work in occupational science and occupational therapy. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 75–84. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686646
   Google Scholar
• Molke, D. K., Laliberte Rudman, D., Polatajko, H. J., Wicks, A., & Townsend, E. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi’s methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.806207
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D., Atler, K., Baltisberger, J., Fehringer, E., Hunter, E., Malkawi, S., & Parr, T. (2010). Occupational science: A data‐based American perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(4), 204–215. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686697
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Sakellariou, D., & Kronenberg, F. (Eds.). (2009). The political practice of occupational therapy. London, UK: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2009). Who’s afraid of critical social science? Current Sociology, 57, 767–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinzak, E. (1999). Marx’s historical conception on ideology and science. In B. Jessop & R. Wheatley (Eds.), Karl Marx’s social and political thought: Critical assessments of leading political philosophers (Vol. 8, pp. 370–391). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(1), 18–26. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686417
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (2012). The 2010 Townsend Polatajko Lectureship: Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 8–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639723
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2001). The occupational agenda of the future. Journal of Occupational Science, 8(1), 13–16. doi:10.1080/14427591.2001.9686480
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2003). Enhancing occupational opportunities in communities: Politics’ third way and the concept of the enabling state. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 40–45. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686509
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar