Situational Analysis: A Visual Analytic Approach that Unpacks the Complexity of Occupation

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 147–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., & Cutchin, M. P. (2013). Dewey’s concepts of embodiment, growth and occupation: Extended bases for a transactional perspective. In M. Cutchin & V. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 13–23). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., & Marterella, A. (2014). Community-engaged research: A path for occupational science in the changing university landscape. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 210–225. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.714077
   Google Scholar
• Angell, A. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, M. (2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In J. C. Meister, T. Kindt, W. Schernus & M. Stein (Eds.), Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 213–237). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Blustein, D. L., Medvide, M. B., & Wan, C. M. (2012). A critical perspective of contemporary unemployment policy and practices. Journal of Career Development, 39(4), 341–356. doi:10.1177/0894845310397545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. (2011). Researching governmentalities through ethnography: The case of Australian welfare reforms and programs for single parents. Critical Policy Studies, 5(3), 264–282. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.606300
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Alternative measures of labor underutilization, Missouri – 2013. News Release 13-446-KAN. Kansas City, MO: US Department of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Demographics: Older workers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm#older
   Google Scholar
• Canada’s Economic Action Plan. (2014). Targeted initiative for older workers. Retrieved from http://www.actionplan.gc.ca/en/initiative/targeted-initiative-older-workers
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, J. (2004). At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(8), 1140–1150. doi:10.1177/1049732304266820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576. doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., & Keller, R. (2013, May). Mapping discourses. Workshop conducted at the International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 303–312. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.3.303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Dickie, V. A., & Humphry, R. (2006). Transaction versus interpretation, or transaction and interpretation: A response to Michael Barber. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 97–99. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686575
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. (2014). What is occupation? In B. A. Boyt Schell, G. Gillen & M. E. Scaffa (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 2–8). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, M., Jacob, J. D., & Holmes, D. (2010). Governing through (in)security: A critical analysis of a fear-based public health campaign. Critical Public Health, 20(2), 245–256. doi:10.1080/09581590903314092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazso, A., & McDaniel, S. (2010). The risks of being a lone mother on income support in Canada and the USA. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(7/8), 363–386. doi:10.1108/01443331011060724
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, P. (2001). Theory and language: Locating agency between free will and discursive marionettes. Nursing Inquiry, 8(1), 11–18. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2001.00084.x
   Google Scholar
• Khaw, L. (2012). Mapping the process: An exemplar of using situational analysis in a grounded theory study. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(2), 138–147. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00126.x
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Adding a political dimension to inquiry. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 169–181). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4). doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Forwell, S. (2013). Special issue on social policy and occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 283–285. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.819598
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–64). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L. E., & Campbell, E. (2010). What will we have ethnography do? Qualitative Inquiry, 16(9), 757–767. doi:10.1177/1077800410374444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licqurish, S., & Seibold, C. (2011). Applying a contemporary grounded theory methodology. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 11–16. doi:10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.11.c8630
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980/2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mathar, T. (2008). Review essay: Making a mess with situational analysis? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Chapman, Y., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2007). Grounded theory: A methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(1), 72–79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counselling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbury, J. (2011). Articles situational analysis: Centerless systems and human service practices. Child & Youth Services, 32, 88–107. doi:10.1080/0145935X.2011.581953
   Google Scholar
• Njelesani, J., Gibson, B. E., Nixon, S., Cameron, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2013). Towards a critical occupational approach to research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Duration of unemployment. In Labour force statistics 2010 (pp. 50–55). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/labour-force-statistics-2010/duration-of-unemployment_lfs-2010-20-en-fr
   Google Scholar
• Perez, M. S. & Cannella, G. S. (2011). Using situational analysis for critical qualitative research purposes. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crises (pp. 97–117). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi’s methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.806207
   Google Scholar
• Reed, K., & Hocking, C. (2013). Resituating the meaning of occupation: A transactional perspective. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 39–50). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2013). Table 282-0048. Labour Force Survey estimates (LFS), duration of unemployment by sex and age group, annual (persons unless otherwise noted). CANSIM (database). Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pickchoisir?lang=eng&p2=33&id=2820048
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, A., Sen, B., Rosa, A., & Ellis, D. (2012). Elaborations of grounded theory in information research: Arenas/social worlds theory, discourse and situational analysis. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 120–146.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Woolford, A., & Nelund, A. (2013). The responsibilities of the poor: Performing neoliberal citizenship within the bureaucratic field. Social Service Review, 87(2), 292–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright-St Clair, V. A., & Smythe, E. A. (2013). Being occupied in the everyday. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 25–38). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wulff, D. (2008). “Research/therapy”: A review of Adele Clarke’s situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. The Weekly Qualitative Report, 1(6), 31–34.
   Google Scholar