“Academic innovation in service of” what? The scope of North American occupational science doctoral graduates’ contributions from 1994–2015

References

• Aldrich, R., & Marterella, A. (2014). Community-engaged research: A path for occupational science in the changing university landscape. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 210–225. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2012.714077
   Google Scholar
• Blanche, E. I., & Henny-Kohler, E. (2000). Philosophy, science and ideology: A proposed relationship for occupational science and occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 7(2), 99–110. doi: 10.1002/oti.110
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. E., & Clark, F. A. (1991). The search for useful methodologies in occupational science. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 235–241. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (1993). Occupation embedded in a real life: Interweaving occupational science and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(12), 1067–1078. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.12.1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(3), 167–179. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2013). Approaching occupational therapy’s silver anniversary: Perspectives on the controversial “marriage” of occupational science and occupational therapy. New York University Steinhardt Department of Occupational Therapy 2013 Anne Cronin Mosey Lectureship. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/62729507
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., & Lawlor, M. C. (2009). The making and mattering of occupational science. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 2–14). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., Parham, D., Carlson, M. E., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R. J., & Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 300–310. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.4.300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F., Zemke, R., Frank, G., Parham, D., Neville-Jan, A., Hedricks, … Abreu, B. (1993). Dangers inherent in the partition of occupational therapy and occupational science. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(2), 184–186. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.2.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2012). The 2010 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 25–35. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. S. (2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996–2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 92–103. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2011). Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 27–33. doi: 10.4276/030802211X12947686093602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2008). Occupational science: Trends, issues and international developments. 8th European Congress of Occupational Therapy, 53rd German Congress of Occupational Therapy, May 22–25, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2016). Launch of “teaching occupation.” Journal of Occupational Science, 23(4), 484–487. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1232643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Dennhardt, S., Fok, D., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A. & Zur, B. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 136–146. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, A. (1997). Occupational science and occupational therapy: Negotiating the boundary between a discipline and a profession. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(2), 56–61. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1997.9686421
   Google Scholar
• Molke, D. K., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269–280. doi: 10.1177/000841740407100505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molineux, M., & Whiteford, G. E. (2011). Occupational science: Genesis, evolution and future contribution. In E. A. S. Duncan (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (pp. 243–253). Sydney, Australia: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey, A. C. (1992). Partition of occupational science and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(9), 851–853. doi: 10.5014/ajot.46.9.851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). The 2011 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science: Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 298–311. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2014). Occupational science: A powerful disciplinary knowledge base for occupational therapy. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 1–10). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D., Atler, K., Baltisberger, J., Fehringer, E., Hunter, E., Malkawi, S., & Parr, T. (2010). Occupational science: A data-based American perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(4), 204–215. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2010.9686697
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. (2012). Occupational science and occupational therapy: A contemporary relationship. In G. Boniface & A. Seymour (Eds.), Using occupational therapy theory in practice (pp. 165–179). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A. (2006). Occupational science: Generating an international perspective. West Nowra, Australia: AOSC.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3^rd ed). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2000). Occupational science: A renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge. Occupational Therapy International, 7(2), 87–98. doi: 10.1002/oti.109
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., … Zemke, R. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar