Inclusión escolar, marginación y apartheid ocupacional: Análisis de las políticas educativas Chilenas

Referencias

• Ainscow, M., & Miles, S. (2008). Por una educación para todos que sea inclusiva:¿ Hacia dónde vamos ahora. Perspectivas, 38(1), 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. doi:10.1080/13603110802504903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbjørnslett, M., Engelsrud, G., & Helseth, S. (2015). Children with disabilities engage in occupations during a transitional phase. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(3), 320–330. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.952365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apablaza, M. (2016). Producción de los discursos de diferencia en el contexto escolar: Problematización de las políticas educativas chilenas. (Tesis de Doctorado), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London, Great Britain: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, B. (2004). The study of diversity - The “knowledge of difference” and the limits of science. Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 285–306. doi:10.1080/00221546.2004.11772257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (2002). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 663–703. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bellei, C. (2015). El gran experimento. Mercado y privatización de la educación chilena. Santiago de Chile: LOM.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2000). Índice de Inclusión. Desarrollando el aprendizaje y la participación en las escuelas. In M. Vaughan (Ed.). Bristol, UK: UNESCO, Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Ball, S., & Maguire, M. (2011). Policy enactments in schools introduction: Towards a toolbox for theory and research. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 581–583. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.601554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. (1995). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 229–238. doi:10.1080/0951839950080302
   Google Scholar
• Buenfil, R. (2011). Apuntes sobre los usos de la teoría en la investigación social: Consideraciones metodológicas en invesigación social. España: Editorial Académica Española.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: The University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A. (2013a). Mecanismos performativos de la institucionalidad educativa en Chile: Pasos hacia un nuevo sujeto cultural. Revista Observatorio Cultural(15), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A. (2013b). Políticas basadas en privatización, estandarización, examinación y accountability educacional: La experiencia anglófona. Pensamiento Educativo, 50(2), 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Castignani, M., López, V., Espinosa, M., & Pavez, S. (2014). Discriminación y segregación: Efectos de la integración escolar sobre los proyectos de vida de estudiantes egresados de escuelas municipales que participaron en proyectos de integración escolar. Revista latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 8(2), 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E. (2017). Occupational justice: A fine balance for occupational therapists. In D. Sakellariou & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integreting justice with practice (2nd ed.). Toronto: ELSEVIER.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Ekelman, B., Bazyk, S., & Bazyk, J. (2012). The relationship between occupational engagement and well-being from the perspective of university students with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(3), 236–252. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.716360
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 33–50. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2011). La arqueologia del saber (A. Garzón, Trans. 2ª ed.). México: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. (2006). Terapia ocupacional en el ámbito social: Aclarando conceptos e ideas. In F. Kronenberg, S. Simó & N. Pollard (Eds.), Terapia ocupacional sin fronteras: Aprendiendo del espíritu de supervivientes (pp. 85–97). Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(2), 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00922.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godoy, P., Meza, M., & Salazar, A. (2004). Antecedentes históricos, presente y futuro de la educación especial en Chile. Santiago: MINEDUC.
   Google Scholar
• Guajardo, A., Kronenberg, F., & Ramugondo, E. (2015). Southern occupational therapies: Emerging identities, epistemologies and practices. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 3–10. doi: 10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a2
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. (2016). Mapping the evolving ideas of occupational justice: A critical analysis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 179–194. doi:10.1177/1539449216672171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2011). Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 27–33. doi:10.4276/030802211X12947686093602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2015). Participation and occupation The need for a human rights perspective. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(1), 4–5. doi:10.1177/0008417414567636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W., & Beagan, B. (2017). Occupational injustice: A critique. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(1), 58–68. doi:10.1177/0008417416638858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama, M. (2004). Meaning and inclusion. Revisting culture in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51, 1–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2004.00429.x
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2006). Superar el apartheid ocupacional: exploración preliminar de la naturaleza política de la terapia ocupacional. In F. Kronenberg, S. Simó & N. Pollard (Eds.), Terapia ocupacional sin fronteras: Aprendiendo del espíritu de supervivientes (pp. 58–84). Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Kumashiro, K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 25–53. doi:10.2307/1170593 doi: 10.3102/00346543070001025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1993). Nuevas reflexiones sobre la revolución de nuestro tiempo. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visioń.
   Google Scholar
• Lauretis, T. (2000). Diferencias. Etapas de un camino a través del feminismo. Madrid: Horas y horas
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2011). Foucault, governmentality and critique. Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Matus, C., & Rojas, C. (2015). Normalidad y diferencia en nuestras escuelas: A propósito de la Ley de Inclusión Escolar. Docencia, 56, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Determina edades mínimas de ingreso a los sistemas de enseñanza de adultos y especial diferencial, 182 C.F.R. (1992).
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2005). Política Nacional de educación especial. Santiago, Chile: MINEDUC.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2009). Fija normas para determinar los alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales que serán beneficiarios de las subvenciones para educación especial., Decreto 170 C.F.R.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2013). Orientaciones técnicas para los Programas de Integración Escolar (PIE). Santiago, Chile: MINEDUC.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2015a). Aprueba criterios y orientaciones de adecuación curricular para estudiantes con NEE de Educación Parvularia y Educación Básica, 83/2015 C.F.R.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2015b). Propuestas para avanzar hacia un sistema educativo inclusivo en Chile: Un aporte de la Educación Especial. Santiago de Chile: MINEDUC.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, K., Brown, T., Peyton, C., Rodger, S., Huang, Y., Wu, C., . . . Swee, C. (2010). Occupational therapy students’ attitudes towards inclusion education in Asutralia, United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Occupational Therapy Intenational, 17, 40–52. doi:10.1002/oti.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, I., & Townsend, E. (2010). Occupational justice—Bridging theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(1), 57–63. doi:10.3109/11038120903287182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OMS. (2001). Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. Madrid, España: Organización Mundial de la Salud.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, O., Soto, X., Barria, C., Lucero, X., Mella, D., Santana, Y., & Seguel, E. (2016). Estudio cualitativo del proceso de adaptación e inclusión de un grupo de estudiantes de educación superior con discapacidad de la universidad de magallanes. Magallania, 44(2), 131–158. doi: 10.4067/S0718-22442016000200007
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. (2012). The potential of occupational therapy services for students with disabilities within tertiary education settings. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(1), 393–396. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.01037.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira, R. (2014). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi's methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.806207
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R., & Whiteford, G. (2013). Understanding social inclusion as an international discourse: Implications for enabling participation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 112–115. doi: 10.4276/030802213X13603244419392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T., & Lindblad, S. (2000). Educational Governance and Social Inclusion and Exclusion: Some conceptual difficulties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 5–44. doi:10.1080/01596300050005484
   Google Scholar
• Prodinger, B., & Turner, S. (2013). Using institutional ethnography to explore how social policies infiltrate into daily life. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 357–369. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.808728
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2013). Políticas educativas en un mundo globalizado. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. USA: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Adding a political dimension to inquiry. In M. Cutchin & V. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 169–181). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L., Cook, J., & Polatajko, H. (1997). Understanding the potential of occupation: A qualitative exploration of seniors’ perspectives on activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(8), 640–650. doi:10.5014/ajot.1997.51.8.640 doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.8.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. Cutchin & V. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–63). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1994). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructualist theory for feminism. The postmodern turn: New perspective on social theory, 15, 282–302. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511570940.020
   Google Scholar
• Sisto, V., & Zelaya, V. (2013). La etnografía de dispositivos como herramienta de análisis y el estudio del managerialismo como práctica local. Universitas Psychologica, 12(4), 1345–1354.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R., & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(2), 173–192. doi:10.1080/09620210100200073
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004a). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation (pp. 243–273). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004b). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87. doi: 10.1177/000841740407100203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteford, G., Townsend, E., Bryanton, O., Wicks, A., & Pereira, R. (2017). The participatory occupational justice framework: Salience across contexts. In D. Sakellariou & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integrating justice with practice (pp. 163–174). Toronto: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A., & Jakobsen, K. (2001). Occupational Terminology Interactive Dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 8(3), 25–31. doi:10.1080/14427591.2000.9686470 doi: 10.1080/14427591.2001.10597272
   Google Scholar
• Zeldenryk, L., & Yalmambirra. (2006). Occupational deprivation: A consequence of Asutralia's policy of assimilation. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53, 43–46. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00530.x
   Google Scholar