Understanding the moral economics of occupational engagement

References

• Anaby, D., Jarus, T., Backman, C. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). The role of occupational characteristics and occupational imbalance in explaining well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(2), 81–104. doi: 10.1007/s11482-010-9094-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2012). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Making the economic habitus: Algerian workers revisited. Ethnography, 1(1), 17–41. doi: 10.1177/14661380022230624
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi: 10.3316/qrj0902027
   Google Scholar
• Brockett, M. (1996). Ethics, moral reasoning and professional virtue in occupational therapy education. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(3), 197–205. doi: 10.1177/000841749606300307
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26(1), 73–96. doi: 10.1177/0891243211427700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A., Parham, D., Carlson, M. E., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D.,  …  & Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 300–310. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.4.300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clubhouse International. (2016). International standards for Clubhouse Programs^TM. Retrieved from https://www.clubhouse-intl.org/documents/standards_2016_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1997). Lone mothers and paid work - Rational economic man or gendered moral rationalities? Feminist Economics, 3(2), 29–61. doi: 10.1057/9780230509689_4
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1969). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Beagan, B. (2017). Occupational injustice: A critique. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(1), 58–68. doi: 10.1177/0008417416638858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–7). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. R. (2016). Daily life participation in a residential facility for adults with intellectual disabilities: An institutional ethnography (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. R., & Bagatell, N. (2017). Beyond custodial care: Mediating choice and participation for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 546–560. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2017.1363078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.) Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 100–116). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–63). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Forwell, S. (2013). Special issue on social policy and occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 283–285. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.819598
   Google Scholar
• Matuska, K. M., & Christiansen, C. H. (2008). A proposed model of lifestyle balance. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(1), 9–19. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686602
   Google Scholar
• Nyman, A., Josephsson, S., & Isaksson, G. (2014). A narrative of agency enacted within the everyday occupations of an older Swedish woman. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 459–472. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.803433
   Google Scholar
• Persson, D., Erlandsson, L-K., Eklund, M., & Iwarsson, S. (2001). Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation - a tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(1), 7–18. doi: 10.1080/11038120119727
   Google Scholar
• Primeau, L. (2000). Divisions of household work, routines, and child care occupations in families. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(1), 19–28. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2000.9686461
   Google Scholar
• Prodinger, B., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Shaw, L. (2015). Institutional ethnography: Studying the situated nature of human occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 71–81. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.813429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachweh, P. (2012). The moral economy of inequality: Popular views on income differentiation, poverty and wealth. Socio-Economic Review, 10(3), 419–445. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwr023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Morrill, C., & Anderson, L. (2003). Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography, 4(2), 181–200. doi: 10.1177/14661381030042002
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), An introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 243–273). Thorofare, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, M. (2017). Segues and synergies: Feminist economist and occupational scientists meet human rights. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 43–53. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1235509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2007). Occupation and health: Are they one and the same?. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2007.9686577
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (1998). Health and the human spirit for occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(6), 412–418. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.6.412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar