Occupational rights, choice and variety: A critical occupational analysis of British Columbia’s Framework for Accessibility Legislation

References

• Bailliard, A. (2014). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biko, S. (1978). I write what I like: A selection of his writings. Bowerdean Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blix, B. H. (2015). “Something decent to wear.” Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414542702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulk, L. Y., Easterbrook, A., Roberts, E., Groening, M., Murphy, S., Lee, M., Ghanouni, P., Gagnon, J., & Jarus, T. (2017). ‘We are not anything alike’: Marginalization of health professionals with disabilities. Disability & Society, 32(5), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1308247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulk, L. Y., Smith, A., Nimmon, L., & Jarus, T. (2020). A closer look at opportunities for blind adults: Impacts of stigmatization and ocularcentralism. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 32(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620911424
   Google Scholar
• CBC News. (2019). Province asking for public input on how to better support people with disabilities. Social Sharing. CBC News Online. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/accessibility-legislation-provincial-consultations-1.5323245
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C. H., Clark, F., Kielhofner, G., & Rogers, J. (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1015–1018. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.10.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., & Polatajko, H. (2010). Occupational development. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 135–170). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Easterbrook, A., Bulk, L. Y., Jarus, T., Hahn, B., Ghanouni, P., Lee, M., Groening, M., Opini, B., & Parhar, G. (2019). University gatekeepers’ use of the rhetoric of citizenship to relegate the status of students with disabilities in Canada. Disability & Society2, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1505603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. (2008). Social inclusion and youth participation: A new deal for Australia’s young people. Youth Studies Australlia, 27(2), 11–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fwww.acys.info%2fjournal%2fissues%2fv27-n2-2008%2farticle_summaries_june_2008%2farticle_1
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmenality (C. Gordon, Trans.). In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, A. J. (2012). Addressing health inequities through Indigenous involvement in health-policy discourses. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 44(2), 108–122. http://cjnr.archive.mcgill.ca/article/view/2352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fridkin, A. (2016). First Nations involvement in health policy decision-making: The paradox of meaningful involvement. University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich, K. L., & Abel, T. (2014). Environmental justice and health practices: Understanding how health inequities arise at the local level. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 152–162). Blackwell Publishing. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118281581
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamieldien, F., & van Niekerk, L. (2017). Street vending in South Africa: An entrepreneurial occupation. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2017/vol47n1a5
   Google Scholar
• Government of British Columbia. (2019). British Columbia Framework for Accessibility Legislation. https://engage.gov.bc.ca/accessibility/read-the-framework/
   Google Scholar
• Grammenos, S. (2003). Illness, disability and social inclusion. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2003/35/en/1/ef0335en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., & Sullivan, C. (2013). The central role of occupation in the doing, being and belonging of immigrant women. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.717499
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2017). Opportunities for well-being: The right to occupational engagement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(4-5), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417417734831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2020). Action on the social determinants of health: Advancing occupational equity and occupational rights. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(1), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.CTOARF2052
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., Wilton, R. D., & Newbold, K. B. (2017). ‘There is always this feeling of otherness’: Exploring the lived experiences of visually impaired immigrant women in Canada. Disability & Society, 32(8), 1121–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1343128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson, H., & Jonsson, H. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.5.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2017). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1294016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot, S., Bulk, L. Y., Damiano, N., Delaisse, A.-C., Kardeh, B., Ogura, S., & Forwell, S. (2019). Occupation & society [class presentation]. University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, K. D. (1995). The idea of social justice in the ancient world. In K. D. Irani & M. Silver (Eds.), Social justice in the ancient world (pp. 3–8). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A., & Durocher, E. (2016). Occupational justice: Moral imagination, critical reflection, and political praxis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216669458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladau, E. (2015). Why person-first language doesn’t always put the person first. Think inclusive. https://www.thinkinclusive.us/why-person-first-language-doesnt-always-put-the-person-first/
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–64). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leadley, S., & Hocking, C. (2017). An occupational perspective of childhood poverty. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lombe, M., & Sherraden, M. (2008). Inclusion in the policy process: An agenda for participation of the marginalised. Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(2-3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588740801938043
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano, A. P. S., De Souza, R. G. D. M., & Lopes, R. E. (2016). Occupational justice and its related concepts: An historical and thematic scoping review. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216669133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction. (2019). Join the conversation on accessibility and inclusion. BC Government News. https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2019SDPR0059-001780
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, T., Whiteford, G., & Wilding, C. (2019). Differentiating occupational decision-making and occupational choice. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(3), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1611472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). The politics of participation: A critical occupational science analysis of social inclusion policy and entrenched disadvantage [Doctoral dissertation]. Macquarie University, Australia. http://www.researchonline.mq.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/mq:30160/SOURCE1?view=true
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2014). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi’s methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.806207
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2017). Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger, B., & Turner, S. M. (2013). Using institutional ethnography to explore how social policies infiltrate into daily life. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.808728
   Google Scholar
• Quesada, J., Hart, L. K., & Bourgois, P. (2011). Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States. Medical Anthropology, 30, 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2011.576725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. J., & Swadener, B. B. (2001). Semiotics and dis/ability: Interrogating categories of difference. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. (2010). Accommodating graduate students with disabilities. http://www.cags.ca/documents/publications/3rdparty/Accommodating_Graduate_Students_with_Disabilities_May-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shergold, P. (2009). Social inclusion: An agenda for citizen empowerment. Australian Philanthropy, 74(Spring), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R., Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329–358). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. G. (2001). The cult of efficiency. House of Anansi.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (Treaty Series, 2515).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., Stanton, S., Law, M., Polatajko, H., & Baptiste, S. (2002). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. CAOT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2014). Occupational justice. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 192–199). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Trani, J. F., Bakhshi, P., Noor, A. A., & Mashkoor, A. (2009). Lack of a will or of a way? Taking a capability approach for analysing disability policy shortcomings and ensuring programme impact in Afghanistan. European Journal of Development Research, 21(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Enable. (2007). Accessibility: A guiding principle of the Convention. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/disacc.htm
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Office of The High Commissioner. (2006). Preamble. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/ConventionRightsPersonsWithDisabilities.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2010). Occupation in context. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux, & J. Supyk-Mellson (Eds.), Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed., pp. 135–150). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., Klomp, N., & Wright-St Clair, V. (2005). Complexity theory: Understanding occupation, practice and context. In G. Whiteford & V. A. Wright-St Clair (Eds.), Occupation and practice in context (pp. 3–15). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3rd ed.). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2019). Position Statement: Occupational therapy and human rights (revised). Author. https://wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-and-human-rights
   Google Scholar
• Zanetti, V. (2001). Global justice: Is interventionism desirable? Metaphilosophy, 32(1-2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar