Meliorism and knowledge mobilization: Strategies for occupational science research and practice

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2004). Creating an academic discipline that supports practice [Keynote lecture]. 16th USC Occupational Science Symposium, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Abma, T. A., Cook, T., Rämgård, M., Kleba, E., Harris, J., & Wallerstein, S. (2017). Social impact of participatory health research: Collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. (2018a). Strengthening associated living: A Deweyan approach to occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1484386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. (2018b). Occupational therapy: A partner for justice in Jesuit higher education. Jesuit Higher Education, 7(2), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Dickie, V. A. (2017). Resource seeking as occupation: A critical and empirical exploration. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(3), 7103260010p1-7103260010p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.021782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2020). Occupational therapists as street-level bureaucrats: Leveraging the political nature of everyday practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419892712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Geyer, R. (2017). “Pragmatic complexity” a new foundation for moving beyond “evidence-based policy making”? Policy Studies, 38(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal, A., Becerik-Gerber, B., Anselmo, F., Roll, S. C., & Lucas, G. M. (2019). Smart desks to promote comfort, health and productivity in offices: A vision for future workplaces. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5(76), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baranek, G. T., Watson, L. R., Crais, E. R., Turner-Brown, L., & Reznick, J. S. (2013). First years inventory - version 3.1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Baranek, G. T., Watson, L. R., Turner-Brown, L., Field, S. H., Crais, E. R., Wakeford, L., Little, L. M., & Reznick, J. S. (2015). Preliminary efficacy of adapted responsive teaching for infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder in a community sample. Autism Research and Treatment, 2015(386951). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/386951
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Breines, E. (1986). Origins and adaptations: A philosophy of practice. Geri-Rehab.
   Google Scholar
• Breines, E. (1990). Genesis of occupation: A philosophical model for therapy and theory. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 37, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.1990.tb01229.x
   Google Scholar
• Breines, E. B. (1995). Understanding ‘occupation’ as the founders did. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(11), 458–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269505801102
   Google Scholar
• Bunting, K. L. (2016). A transactional perspective on occupation: A critical reflection. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23(5), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2016.1174294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey. Open Court Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C. (2007). Adolf Meyer revisited: Connections between lifestyles, resilience and illness. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2007.9686586
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., & Lawlor, M. C. (2009). The making and mattering of occupational science. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 2–14). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., Azen, S. P., Zemke, R., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Hay, J., Josephson, K., Cherry, B., Hessel, C., Palmer, J., & Lipson, L. (1997). Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults. A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(16), 1321–1326. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550160041036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A., Blanchard, J., Sleight, A., Cogan, A., Floríndez, L., Gleason, S., Heymann, R., Hill, V., Holden, A., Murphy, M., Proffitt, R., Niemiec, S. S., & Vigen, C. (2015). Lifestyle redesign®: The intervention tested in the USC well elderly studies (2nd ed.). American Occupational Therapy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., Parham, D., Carlson, M. E., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R. J., & Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.4.300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A., Sanders, K., Carlson, M. E., Blanche, E. J., & Jackson, J. M. (2007). Synthesis of habit theory. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 27(4), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492070270S103
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2013). The art and science of occupation: Nature, inquiry, and the aesthetics of living. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.744290
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin M., & Dickie V. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2015). The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Classic Literature Reprint.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, V., Frank, G., & Mizue, A. (2020). Candangos: Occupational reconstruction as a tool to understand social problems and transformative action in the utopian city of Brasília. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(3), Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoED2802
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L., Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Schiller, S., Malfitano, A. P. S., Thomas, K., & van Bruggen, H. (2019). Critical dialogical approach: A methodological direction for occupation-based social transformative work. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1469666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, M. (2017). Ideal and actual in Dewey’s political theory. In S. Dieleman, D. Rondel, & C. Voparil (Eds.), Pragmatism and justice (pp. 97–113). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fesmire, S. (2015). Dewey. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What we made: Conversations on art and social cooperation. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2013). Twenty-first century pragmatism and social justice: Problematic situations and occupational reconstructions in post-civil war Guatemala. In M. Cutchin, & V. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 229–243). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2020). Social transformation theory and practice: Resources for radicals in participatory art, occupational therapy and social movements. In H. van Bruggen, S. Kantartzis, & N. Pollard (Eds.), And a seed was planted (pp. 107–128). Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Dos Santos, V. (2020). Occupational reconstructions: Resources for social transformation in challenging times. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy 28(2), Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoed2802
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., Fishman, M., Crowley, C., Blair, B., Murphy, S., Montoya, J., Hickey, M., Brancaccio, M., & Bensimon, E. (2001). The new stories/new cultures after-school enrichment program: A direct cultural intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.5.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Muriithi, B. A. K. (2015). Theorizing social transformation in occupational science: The American civil rights movement and South African struggle against apartheid as ‘occupational reconstructions.’ Journal of South African Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a3
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., Murphy, S., Kitching, H. J., Garfield, D. M., & McDarment, N. (2008). The Tule River tribal history project: Evaluating a California tribal government’s collaboration with anthropology and occupational therapy to preserve indigenous history and promote tribal goals. Human Organization, 67(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.4.w605825710nu5v70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Zemke, R. (2009). Occupational therapy foundations for political engagement and social transformation. In N. Pollard, D. Sakellariou, & F. Kronenberg (Eds.), A political practice of occupational therapy (pp. 111–135). Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Freuler, A. C., Baranek, G. T., Tashjian, C., Watson, L. R., Crais, E., & Turner-Brown, L. (2014). Parent reflections of experiences of participating in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention for infants at-risk for ASD. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 18(5), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313483928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaude, E. (2009). In a shade of blue: Pragmatism and the politics of Black America. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226298269
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. S. (2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996-2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. M. (2008). Pragmatism and social hope: Deepening democracy in global contexts. In Pragmatism and social hope. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/gree14458
   Google Scholar
• Hall-Clifford, R., & Frank, G. (2013). Teaching for human rights advocacy in Guatemala: The case for transdisciplinarity. Teaching Anthropology, 2(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v2i2.347
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2009). Sacred texts: A sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740907600105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, A., Davies, C., Aumann, K., Wenger, E., Aranda, K., Heaver, B., & Wolff, D. (2013). Mobilising knowledge in community−university partnerships: What does a community of practice approach contribute? Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.767470
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, D. (2013). Dewey’s pragmatism: Instrumentalism and meliorism. In A. Malachowski (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to pragmatism (pp. 55–80). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139022132
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Wright-St. Clair, V. (2011). Occupational science: Adding value to occupational therapy. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(1), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., & Wood, W. (2002). Pragmatism and structuralism in occupational therapy: The long conversation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphry, R. (2002). Young children’s occupations: Explicating the dynamics of developmental processes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.2.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikiugu, M. N., & Schultz, S. (2006). An argument for pragmatism as a foundational philosophy of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.05.0009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiepek, N. C., Beagan, B., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Phelan, S. (2019). Silences around occupations framed as unhealthy, illegal, and deviant. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1499123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowledge Mobilization. (n.d.). http://researchimpact.ca/knowledge-mobilization/
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, C. (2006). Pragmatism as a philosophy of hope: Emerson, James, Dewey, Rorty. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 20(2), 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper Series 03/09. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kundacki, D. (2018). “Good” future expectation of modern man: Meliorism. In I. Aysel, K. Caglar, & I. Yorulmaz (Eds.), Talks on education, art, and philosophy (pp. 129–143). Vernon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Aldrich, R. (2016). ‘Activated, but stuck’: Applying a critical occupational lens to examine the negotiation of long-term unemployment in contemporary socio-political contexts. Societies, 6(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaf, M. (2009). Human organizations and social theory: Pragmatism, pluralism, and adaptation. University of Illinois Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1xcgww
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, P. (2017). What difference could pragmatism have made? From architectural effects to architecture’s consequences. Footprint, 20, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, T. (1966). Adolf Meyer and the development of American psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 123(3), 320–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lief, A. (Ed.). (1948). The commonsense psychiatry of Dr. Adolf Meyer. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, J., & Josephsson, S. (2017). Engagement in occupation as an inquiring process: Exploring the situatedness of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1308266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In G. E. Whiteford, & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science society, inclusion, participation (pp. 8–19). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Madzia, R., & Jung, M. (Eds.). (2016). Pragmatism and embodied cognitive science: From bodily intersubjectivity to symbolic articulation. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano, A., Lopes, R., Magalhães, L., & Townsend, E. (2014). Social occupational therapy: Conversations about a Brazilian experience. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(5), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414536712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin Gray, J. (1998). Putting occupation into practice: Occupation as ends, occupation as means. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(5), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.52.5.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molineux, M. (Ed.). (2004). Occupation for occupational therapists. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Molineux, M., & Whiteford, G. E. (2011). Occupational science: Genesis, evolution and future contribution. In E. A. S. Duncan (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (5th ed., pp. 243–253). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Molke, D. K., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison, R. (2016). Pragmatist epistemology and Jane Addams: Fundamental concepts for the social paradigm of occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 23, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, G. (2008). John Dewey’s ethics: Democracy as experience. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, G. (2017). The centrality of Dewey’s lectures in China to his socio-political philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Pierce Society, 53(1), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, N., Kothari, A., & Masood, S. (2017). Identifying and understanding research impact: A review for occupational scientists. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1277547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, D., Cummins, J., Pepler, D. J., Craig, W., & Cardinal, S. (2016). The co-produced pathway to impact describes knowledge mobilization processes. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 9(1), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2009) Co-occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686663
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). The 2011 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science: Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2014). Occupational science: A powerful disciplinary knowledge base for occupational therapy. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 1–10). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Pyatak, E. A., Carlson, M., Vigen, C. L., Blanchard, J., Niemiec, S. S., Sideris, J., & Baranek, G. T. (2019). Contextualizing the positive effects of the Well Elderly 2 trial: A response to Schelly and Ohl (2019). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(6), 7306205100p1-7306205100p11. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.038752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, K. (2017). Identification of the people and critique of the ideas in Meyer’s philosophy of occupation therapy. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 33(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2017.1280445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L., & Kronenberg, F. (2015). Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (1924). A critique of meliorism. International Journal of Ethics, 34(2), 175–194. www.jstor.org/stable/2377192
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, R. J. (2003). Richard Rorty’s philosophy of social hope. Philosophy Today, 47(4), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200347430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderhan, E. (2011). Pragmatism and empirical sociology: The case of Jane Addams and Hull-House, 1889–1895. Theory and Society, 40(6), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9156-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solymosi, T., & Shook, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Neuroscience, neurophilosophy, and pragmatism: Brains at work with the world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stitzlein, S. (2018). Hoping and democracy. Contemporary Pragmatism, 15(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01502004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. M. (1981). W. E. B. Dubois’s challenge to scientific racism. Journal of Black Studies, 11(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193478101100405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (Ed.). (2012). Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991–2011. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torres Colón, G. A., & Hobbs, C. A. (2015). The intertwining of culture and nature: Franz Boas, John Dewey, and Deweyan strands of American anthropology. Journal of the History of Ideas, 76(1), 139–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centered practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twinley, R. (2013). The dark side of occupation: A concept for consideration. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60, 301–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USC Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy. (2019, December 18). 30 years of occupational science [Video file]. https://youtu.be/wsV5VzlahkA
   Google Scholar
• USC Department of Occupational Therapy. (1989). Proposal: Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Occupational Science (Yerxa, Box 3, Folder 7). USC Chan Archive, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Voparil, C. (2014). Rorty and Dewey revisited: Toward a fruitful conversation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50(3), 373–404. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.3.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitlauf, A. S., McPheeters, M. L., Peters, B., Sathe, N., Travis, R., Aiello, R., Williamson, E., Veenstra-VanderWeele, J., Krishnaswami, S., Jerome, R., & Warren, Z. (2014). Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorder: Behavioral interventions update. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK241444/
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, R. (2005). Democratic hope: Pragmatism and the politics of truth. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherbe, J. (2019, April 25). How intelligent workstations will use AI to improve health and happiness. https://news.usc.edu/155992/intelligent-workstations-desk-design/
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1991). Occupational science. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(8), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269105400807
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2014). Reflections from the JOS founder. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.878200
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. O., Davis, J. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2005). Occupational development: Towards an understanding of children’s doing. Journal of Occupational Science, 12(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2005.9686545
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2000). Occupational science: A renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge. Occupational Therapy International, 7(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.109
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2020, March). A science of hope: How our audacious community of scholars created occupational science. USC Chan Magazine, Fall 2019/Winter 2020, 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., Stein, C., & Zemke, R. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar