An untold story: A unifying narrative of the discipline of occupational science

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2001). The chaos of disciplines. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (2004, Jan. 16). Creating an academic discipline that supports practice [Paper presentation]. 16th Occupational science Symposium at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., Gupta, J., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). “Academic innovation in service of” what? The scope of North American occupational science doctoral graduates’ contributions from 1994–2015. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1365257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, A. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. D. (2004). Occupational science and phenomenology: Human activity, narrative and ethical responsibility. Journal of Occupational Science, 11(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2004.9686538
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsall, A. (2012). An examination of the pairing between narrative and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.552119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990). Culture and human development: A new look. Human Development, 33, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1994). The remembered self. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self- narrative (pp. 41–54). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., & Dunlea, A. (1995). Further thoughts on the pitfalls of partition: A response to Mosey occupational science. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrithers, M. (1992). Why humans have cultures: Explaining anthropology and social diversity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (1993). Occupation embedded in a real life: Occupational science and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(12), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.12.1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A. (2001). Editorial. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120118826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A. (2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(2-3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., Azen, S., Zemke, R., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Hay, J., Josephson, K., Cherry, B., Hessel, C., Palmer, J., & Lipson. L. (1997). Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 278(16), 1321–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A., & Lawlor, M. C. (2009). The making and mattering of occupational science. In E. Crepeau, E. Cohn, & B. Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 2–14). J. B. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Cloete, L. G., & Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). “I drink”: Mothers’ alcohol consumption as both individualised and imposed occupation. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a6
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational science, 21(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2002). Culture and human development. Human Development, 45, 299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational science, 23(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvberg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2012). The 2010 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science: Occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2014). Occupation for population health: An appreciation. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.891432
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Muriithi, B. A. K. (2015). Theorising social transformation in occupational science: The American civil rights movement and South African struggle against apartheid as ‘occupational reconstructions’. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a3
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015) The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. S. (2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996–2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. M. (1997). Application of the phenomenological method to the concept of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1997.9686416
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, C., & Lawlor, M. C. (2018). Understanding lived experiences through multiple perspectives: Caregiving as an exemplar. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1521738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10:1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, and participation (pp. 54–66). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2017). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion. Journal of Occupational science, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1294016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, R. (2005). Model of processes transforming occupations: Exploring societal and social Influences. Journal of Occupational Science, 12(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2005.9686546
   Google Scholar
• Hvarinen, M. (2010). Revisiting the narrative turns. Life Writing, 7(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484520903342957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikiugu, M., Pollard, N., Cross, A., Willer, M., Everson, J., & Stockland, J. (2012). Meaning making through occupations and occupational roles: A heuristic study of worker-writer histories. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(6), 289–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (1998). Minima ethnographic: Intersubjectivity and the anthropological project. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2017). Collective occupation in public spaces and the construction of the social fabric. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417417701936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, and participation (pp. 69–85). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Aldrich, R. M. (2017). Discerning the social in individual stories of occupation through critical narrative inquiry. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1369144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Dennhardt, S., Folk, D., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A., & Zur, B. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Craig, C., Kantartzis, S., Piškur, B., Algado Simó, S., Van Bruggen, H., & Schiller, S. (2018). Contributing to social transformation through occupation: Experiences from a think tank. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1538898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M. C. (2009). Narrative, development, and engagement: Intersections in therapeutic practices. In U. Jensen & C. Mattingly (Eds.), Narrative, self, and social practices (pp. 199–220). Philosophia Press, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M. C. (2010). Commentary: Autism and anthropology? Ethos, 38(1), 171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M. C. (2012). The particularities of engagement: Intersubjectivity in occupational therapy practice. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32(4), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20120302-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L., Farias, L., Rivas-Quarneti, L., Alvarez, L., & Malfitano, A.P.S. (2019). The development of occupational science outside the Anglophone sphere: Enacting global collaboration. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1530133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (2010). The paradox of hope: Journeys through a clinical borderland. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. C., & Pratt, M. W. (2006). Life’s little (and big) lessons: Identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1996). Missing persons: Recovering developmental stories/histories. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 73–99). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Molke, D. K. M., Laliberte-Rudman, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison, R., Gómez, S., Henny, E., Tapia, M. J., & Rueda, L. (2017). Principal approaches to understanding occupation and occupational science found in the Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy (2001-2012). Occupational Therapy International, Article 5413628. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5413628
   Google Scholar
• Mounter, C., & Ilott, I. (1997). Occupational science: A journey of discovery in the United Kingdom. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1997.9686420
   Google Scholar
• Park, M. (2008). Making scenes: Imaginative practices of a child with autism in a sensory integration–based therapy session. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 22(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1387.2008.00024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2009). Occupational identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686647
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D., Atler, K., Baltisberger, J., Fehringer, E., Hunter, E., Malkawi, S., & Parr, T. (2010). Occupational science: A data-based American perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(4), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686697
   Google Scholar
• Pyatak, E. (2011). Participation in occupation and diabetes self management in emerging adulthood. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 462–469. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.001453
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L., & Kronenberg, F. (2015). Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricouer, P. (1990). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, O., & Bagatell, N. (2010). Introduction: Autism: Rethinking the possibilities. Ethos, 38(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, O., & Lawlor, M. C. (2013). “And I look down and he is gone”: Narrating autism, development and wandering in Los Angeles. Social Science and Medicine, 94, 106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1994). One way to build a clinically relevant baby. Infant Mental Health Journal, 15(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(199421)15:1<9::AID-IMHJ2280150103>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (2004). Comments: The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 281. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100505
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortings, Y. H. (2002). On the study of culture in developmental science. Human Development, 45(5), 246–256.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2016). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V., & Penuel, W. R. (1999). The individual-society antinomy revisited; Productive tensions in theories of human development, communication, and education. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments (pp. 339–359). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, inclusion, and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, and participation (pp. 187–207). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, L. M., & Whiteford, G. (2007). Life history as a tool for understanding occupation, identity and context. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2007.9686591
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (1993) Occupational science: A new source of power for participants in occupational therapy. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 1(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1993.9686373
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2000). Occupational science: A renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge. Occupational Therapy International, 7(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.109
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar