Co-occupation and co-constructed habits, routines, and sense of place: An argument for exploration of human-canine interaction

References

• Albuquerque, N., Guo, K., Wilkinson, A., Savalli, C., Otta, E., & Mills, D. (2016). Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biology Letters, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Pet Products Association. (2019). Pet industry market size, trends & ownership statistics. https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp
   Google Scholar
• American Veterinary Medical Association. (2019). Human-animal bond. https://www.avma.org/one-health/human-animal-bond
   Google Scholar
• Beisecker, D. (1999). The importance of being erroneous: Prospects for animal intentionality. Philosophical Topics, 27(1), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199927123
   Google Scholar
• Berns, G. S., & Cook, P. F. (2016). Why did the dog walk into the MRI? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(5), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416665006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). How to stay healthy around pets: Understanding the risks and benefits of pets. https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/health-benefits/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. A. (2000). The concepts of habit and routine: A preliminary theoretical synthesis. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20(1), 123S–137S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492000200S114
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. H., Tedeschi, P., & Elvove, E. (2015). Forward thinking: The evolving field of human-animal interactions. In A. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal-assisted interventions (4th ed., pp. 21–35). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00003-1
   Google Scholar
• Fugazza, C., Moesta, A., Pogány, Á., & Miklósi, Á. (2018). Social learning from conspecifics and humans in dog puppies. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 9257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27654-0
   Google Scholar
• Hare, B. (2004). Domestic dogs use humans as tools. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior, Vol. I (pp. 277–285). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1634–1636. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. R., & Prouvost, C. (2014). Jealousy in dogs. Plos One, 9(7), e94597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. I., & Sholtis, S. D. (2016). Companion angels on a leash: Welcoming service dogs into classroom communities for children with autism. Childhood Education, 92(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2016.1208003
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (1994). A model of interaction between objects, occupation, society, and culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 1(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1994.9686384
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (1997). Person-object interaction model: Understanding the use of everyday objects. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1997.9686418
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Having and using objects in the western world. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(3), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686478
   Google Scholar
• Human Animal Bond Research Institute & Cohen Research Group. (2016). Survey: Pet owners and the human-animal bond. Human Animal Bond Research Institute. https://habri.org/2016-pet-owners-survey
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, R., & Thigpen-Beck, B. (1998). Parenting values and attitudes: Views of therapists and parents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(10), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.52.10.835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, J., & Nitzschner, M. (2013). Do dogs get the point? A review of dog-human communication ability. Learning and Motivation, 44(4), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, G. N., Allen, K., Braun, L. T., Christian, H. E., Friedmann, E., Taubert, K. A., Thomas, S. A., Wells, D. L., Lange, R. A., American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, & Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. (2013). Pet ownership and cardiovascular risk: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 127(3), 2353–2363. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829201e1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, P. J., Sun, J., & Yu, D. (2017). Dog “meat” consumption in China. Society & Animals, 25(6), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losey, R. J., Bazaliiskii, V. I., Garvie-Lok, S., Germonpré, M., Leonard, J. A., Allen, A. L., Katzenberg, M. A., & Sablin, M. V. (2011). Canids as persons: Early neolithic dog and wolf burials, Cis-baikal, Siberia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 30(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall-Pescini, S., Ceretta, M., & Prato-Previde, E. (2014). Do domestic dogs understand human actions as goal-directed? Plos One, 9(9), e106530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall-Pescini, S., & Kaminski, J. (2014). The social dog: History and evolution. In J. Kaminski & S. Marshall-Pescini (Eds.), The social dog behaviour and cognition (pp. 3–33). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407818-5.00001-2
   Google Scholar
• Miklósi, Á. (2014). Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646661.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Miklósi, A., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2000). Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: An experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Animal Cognition, 3(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710000072
   Google Scholar
• Mubanga, M., Byberg, L., Nowak, C., Egenvall, A., Magnusson, P. K., Ingelsson, E., & Fall, T. (2017). Dog ownership and the risk of cardiovascular disease and death: A nationwide cohort study. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 15821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16118-6
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C. A., Schmitt, K., Barber, A. L. A., & Huber, L. (2015). Dogs can discriminate emotional expressions of human faces. Current Biology, 25(5), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., Onaka, T., Mogî, M., & Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachana, N. A., Massavelli, B. M., & Robleda-Gomez, S. (2011). A developmental psychological perspective on the human-animal bond. In C. Blazina, G. Bovraz, & D. Shen-Miller (Eds.), The psychology of the human-animal bond: A resource for clinicians and researchers (pp. 151–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_9
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, C. (2013). Dogs, history, and agency. History and Theory, 52(4), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickens, N. A., & Pizur-Barnekow, K. (2009). Co-occupation: Extending the dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686656
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2003). Occupation by design: Building therapeutic power. F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2009). Co-occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686663
   Google Scholar
• Podberscek, A. L. (2009). Good to pet and eat: The keeping and consuming of dogs and cats in South Korea. Journal of Social Issues, 65(3), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, P., & Stephenson, S. M. (2009). Learning to promote occupational development through co-occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686660
   Google Scholar
• Rowles, G. (2000). Habituation and being in place. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20(S1), S52–S67. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492000200S105
   Google Scholar
• Rowles, G. D. (2008). Place in occupational science: A life course perspective on the role of environmental context in the quest for meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686622
   Google Scholar
• Sable, P. (2013). The pet connection: An attachment perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0405-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. (2002). Physical comminglings: Body, habit, and space transformed into place. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22(S1), 42S–51S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492020220S106
   Google Scholar
• Trust for Public Land. (2019). Dog park rankings for the 100 largest U. S. cities, 2019. https://www.tpl.org/sites/default/files/City%20Park%20Facts%20Dog%20Parks%202019_R5_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Zhai, W., Yang, H., Fan, R., Cao, X., Zhong, L., Wang, L., Liu, F., Wu, H., Cheng, L., Poyarkov, A. D., Poyarkov Jr, N. A., Tang, S., Zhao, W., Gao, Y., Lv, X., Irwin, D. M., Savolainen, P., Wu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2013). The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans. Nature Communications, 4, Article 1860. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2814
   Google Scholar
• Wensley, R., & Slade, A. (2012). Walking as a meaningful leisure occupation: The implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802212X13286281651117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkle, M. Y., Nelson, R. A., Woolf, J., Deitz, J. C., & Crowe, T. K. (2019). Effects of partnerships between adolescents with developmental disabilities and service dogs. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1520
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (1998a). Biological requirements for occupation in primates: An exploratory study and theoretical analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 5(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1998.9686435
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (1998b). Environmental influences upon the social choices, occupational behaviors and adaptedness of zoo chimpanzees: Relevance to occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038129809035737
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (1998c). Interactions among environmental enrichment, viewing crowds, and zoo chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes). Zoo Biology, 17(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:3<211::AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (2019). Envisioning the environment, time and occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(4), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1595097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimolag, U. U. (2011). An evolutionary concept analysis of caring for a pet as an everyday occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.586325
   Google Scholar