Formative Assessment in Property Education: A Comparison Between Blended and Online Learning

References

• Anderson RI, Loviscek AL and Webb JR 2000, ‘Problem-based learning in real estate education’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol.3, pp. 35-41.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh JB 2005, ‘Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses?’,Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, pp. 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Asan A 2003, ‘School experience course with multimedia in teacher education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19, pp. 21-34.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik JA and Kulik CLC 1991, ‘Effect of frequent classroom testing’, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 85, pp. 89-99.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J 2003, Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations Conference, 13-17 April, University of Aveiro.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J and Tang C 2007, Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does, 3rdEd, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Maidenhead.
   Google Scholar
• Black P and William D 1998, ‘Assessment and classroom learning’, Assessment and Education, Vol. 5, pp. 7-74.
   Google Scholar
• Bodzin AM and Cates W 2003, ‘Enhancing preservice teachers’ understanding of web-based scientific inquiry’, Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 14, pp. 237-257.
   Google Scholar
• Born WL 2003, ‘A real estate fundamentals project to enhance learning’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 6, pp. 239-254.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd T 2010, ‘Are we exemplars for the property profession?’,Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 126-140.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle JT and Nicol DJ 2003, ‘Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings’, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 43-57.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan T 2000, ‘The efficacy of a world-wide web mediated formative assessment’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 16, pp. 193-200.
   Google Scholar
• Burrow M, Evdorides H, Hallam B and Freer-Hewish R 2005, ‘Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in engineering’, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.30, pp. 255-263.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Technology in Learning 2009, Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, US Dept of Education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cole JM and Hilliard VR 2006, ‘The effect of web-based reading curriculum on children’s reading performance and motivation’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 34, pp. 353-380.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish S, Reed R and Wilkinson S 2009, ‘Incorporating new technology into the delivery of property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 303-320.
   Google Scholar
• deLeon L and Killian J 2000, ‘Comparing modes of delivery: classroom and on-line (and other) learning’, Journal of Public Affairs Education’, Vol. 6, pp. 5-18.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman R and Lewis R 1998, Planning and implementing assessment, London, Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner L, Sheridan D and White D 2002, ‘A web-based learning and assessment system to support flexible education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 18, pp. 125-136.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR and Kanuka H 2004, ‘Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education’, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 95-105.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch J and Hughes M 2007, ‘Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates’, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 8, pp. 259-273.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves E 2005, ‘Assessment for learning? thinking outside the (black) box’, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 35, pp. 213-224.
   Google Scholar
• Hefferan M and Ross S 2010, ‘Forces for change in property education and research in Australia’, Property Management, Vol. 28, pp. 370-381.
   Google Scholar
• Henly DC 2003, ‘Use of web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit’, European Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 7, pp. 116-122.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins C and Bligh B 2006, Formative computer-based assessment in diagram based domains, The 11thAnnual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 98-102, 26-28 June, Bologna, Italy,.http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1150000/1140152/p98-higgins.pdf?ip=130.220.71.19&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&CFID=152535661&CFTOKEN=17907485&__acm__=1346895133_20cb24bd8bf66792c1c92a12fc10009d (Accessed 6 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Higgins R, Hartley P and Skelton A 2001, ‘Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback’, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 6, pp. 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic R, Clark R and Rimmershaw R 2000, ‘What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments, in: MR Lea and B Stierer (eds) Student writing in higher education: new contexts, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 47-65.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson AM, Iverson GL and Lukin LE 1994, ‘Frequent, ungraded testing as an instructional strategy’, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 62, pp. 93-101.
   Google Scholar
• Jones BD 2003, ‘Students as web site authors: effects on motivation and achievement’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 31, pp. 441-461.
   Google Scholar
• Kift S 2002, Assuring quality in the casualisation of teaching, learning and assessment: towards best practice for the first year experience, The 6th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, 8-10 July, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kift S 2004, Organising first year engagement around learning: formal and informal curriculum intervention, The 8th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, 14 - 16 July, Melbourne, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Koulizos P 2006, Property education: how should it be taught?’, The 12th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 22-25 January, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Krause K and Coates H 2008, ‘Students’ engagement in first-year university’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 33, pp. 493-505.
   Google Scholar
• Krause K, Hartley R, James R and McInnis C 2005, The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from a decade of national studies, DEST, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard D 2002, Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2ndEd, Routledge Falmer, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lea SJ, Stephenson D and Troy J 2003, ‘Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond ‘educational bulimia’?’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 28, pp. 321-334.
   Google Scholar
• Lowes S, Lin P and Wang Y 2007, ‘Studying the effectiveness of the discussion forum in online professional development courses’, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Vol. 6, pp. 181-210.
   Google Scholar
• Mak MY, Sher WD and Williams AP 2010, Students’ evaluation of an online postgraduate property program, The 16th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 24-27 January, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez JGR and Martinez NC 1992, ‘Re-examining repeated testing and teacher effects in a remedial mathematics course’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 356-363.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol DJ and Macfarlane-Dick D 2006, ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 31, pp. 199-218.
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall G and Alton-Lee A 1995, ‘Assessing classroom learning: How students use their knowledge and experience to answer classroom achievement test questions in science and social studies’, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 185-223.
   Google Scholar
• Peat M and Franklin S 2002, ‘Supporting student learning: the use of computer-based formative assessment modules’, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 515-523.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR 1995, Understandig self-regulated learning, Jossey-Bass, San Franscisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR and Zusho A 2002, ‘Student motivation and self-regulated learninig in the college classroom’, in JC Smart and WG Tierney (Eds) Higher Education: handbook of theory and research, Vol. XVII, Agathon Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad A 1983, ‘On the definition of feedback’, Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, pp. 4-13.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden P 2003, Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR 1989, ‘Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems’, Instructional Science, Vol. 18, pp. 119-144.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR 1998, ‘Formative assessment: revisiting the territory’, Assessment in Education, Vol. 5, pp. 77-84.
   Google Scholar
• Sander P, Stevenson K, King M and Coates D 2000, ‘University students expectations of teaching’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 309-323.
   Google Scholar
• Santally M and Raverdy J 2006, ‘The master’s program in computer-mediated computer communications: a comparative study of two cohorts of students’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 54, pp. 312-326.
   Google Scholar
• Schloss PJ, Smith MA and Posluzsny M 1990, ‘The impact of formative and summative assessment upon test performance of science education majors’, Teacher Education and Special Education Majors, Vol. 13, pp. 3-8.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard LA 2005, ‘Linking formative assessment to scaffolding’, Educational Leadership, November, pp. 66-70.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Chung JKH, Challis D and Cheung RCT 2007, ‘A comparative study of student performance in traditional mode and online mode of learning’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 15, pp. 30-40.
   Google Scholar
• Sly L 1999, ‘Practice test as formative assessment improve student performance on computer-managed learning assessment’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 24, pp. 339-343.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro RJ and Jehng J 1990, ‘Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter’, in D. Nix and R. Spiro (eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 163-205.
   Google Scholar
• Strawitz BM 1989, ‘The effect of testing on science process skill achievement’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 26, pp. 659-664.
   Google Scholar
• Susilawati C and Peach D 2012, Challenges of measuring learning outcomes for property students engaged in work integrated learning, The 18th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 15-18 January, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• University of South Australia 2010, About moodle. http://www.unisa.edu.au/learnonline/staff/about_moodle.asp(Accessed 12 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Velan GM, Kumar RK, Dziegielewski M and Wakefield D 2002, ‘Web-based self-assessment in pathology with questionmark perception’, Pathology, Vol. 34, pp. 282-284.
   Google Scholar
• Wang TH 2008, ‘Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation’, Computers and Education, Vol. 51, pp. 1247-1263.
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton ML and Wolverton M 2003, ‘An asynchronous augmentation to traditional course delivery’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 6, pp. 225-238.
   Google Scholar
• Yam S and Rossini P 2010, ‘Effectiveness of project-based learning as a strategy for property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 291-313.
   Google Scholar
• Yam S and Rossini P 2012, ‘Online learning and blended learning: Experience from a first-year undergraduate property valuation course’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 129-148.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke M 2001, ‘Formative assessment and its relevance to retention’, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 20, pp. 115-126.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke M 2003, ‘Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice’, Higher Education, Vol. 45, pp. 477-501.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ and Schunk DH 2001, Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Mahwah, NJ.
   Google Scholar