How gameplay can enhance learning and engagement for first year property students: a case study using Monopoly City^TM

References

• Akl, E., Pretorius, R., Sackett, K., Erdley, W., Bhoopathi, P., Alfarah, Z., & Schünemann, H. (2010). The effect of educational games on medical students’ learning outcomes: A systematic review: BEME guide no 14. Medical Teacher, 32, 16–27.10.3109/01421590903473969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansoms, A., & Geenen, S. (2012). Development monopoly: A simulation game on poverty and inequality. Simulation and Gaming., 43(6), 853–862.10.1177/1046878112451877
   Google Scholar
• Auman, C. (2011). Using simulation games to increase student and instructor engagement. College Teaching, 59(4), 154–161.10.1080/87567555.2011.602134
   Google Scholar
• Australian Council for Educational Research. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, A. (2002). Everything I know about business I learned from Monopoly®: Successful executive strategic lessons learned from the world’s greatest board game. Philadelphia, PA: Running Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axelson, R., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38–43.10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. (2015). Playing property – Designing serious games to enhance the learning experience for undergraduate property students in Australia (thesis). University of the Sunshine Coast.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. (2016). Experiencing university through playing property. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 22(1), 31–44.10.1080/14445921.2016.1182613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library, ISBN 0-203-22434-5.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., Boyle, E., MacArthur, T., & Boyle, J. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2011). Games and students: Perceptions and evidence from a DUT case study. The International Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(10), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377.10.5465/AMR.2008.31193235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, J. (2005). Half real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, P., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research reader (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Cambridge, MA: Education Arcade.
   Google Scholar
• Moizer, J., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. (2009). Simulation and games: Overcoming the barriers to their use in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 207–224.10.1177/1469787409343188
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., Kift, S., & Clarke, J. (2012). A transition pedagogy for student engagement and first year learning, success and retention. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with Learning in Higher Education (pp. 117–144). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paino, M., & Chin, J. (2011). Monopoly and critical theory: Gaming in a class on the sociology of deviance. Simulation Gaming, 42(5), 571–588.10.1177/1046878110391022
   Google Scholar
• Queensland University of Technology. (2013). Learning and teaching unit. www.qut.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• Sauve, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J.-S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: A systematic review. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanklin, S., & Ehlen, C. (2007). Using the Monopoly ® board game as an efficient tool in introductory financial accounting instruction. Journal of Business Case Studies, 3(3), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, M., & Lindquist, T. (1998). Teaching resource using Monopoly™ and Teams-Games Tournaments in accounting education: A cooperative learning teaching resource. Accounting Education, 7(2), 139–162.10.1080/096392898331225
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21–40.10.1080/17439880601141179
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., Nimwegen, C., Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, February 4, Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., Slota, S., Cutter, A., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., … Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82, 61–89.10.3102/0034654312436980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar