References
- ArgoJ. J., & MainK. J. (2004). Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.23.2.193.51400.
- BlaszczynskiA., GainsburyS., & KarlovL. (2014). Blue gum gaming machine: An evaluation of responsible gambling features. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 697–712.
- BlaszczynskiA., LadouceurR., & ShafferH. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.
- CloutierM., LadouceurR., & SévignyS. (2006). Responsible gambling tools: Pop-up messages and pauses on video lottery terminals. The Journal of Psychology, 140, 434–438. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.140.5.434-438.
- DowlingN., SmithD., & ThomasT. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling?. Addiction, 100, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x.
- FerrisJ., & WynneH. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
- FloydK., WhelanJ. P., & MeyersA. W. (2006). Use of warning messages to modify gambling beliefs and behavior in a laboratory investigation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.69.
- GainsburyS. (2011). Player account-based gambling: Potentials for behaviour-based research methodologies. International Gambling Studies, 11, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.571217.
- GainsburyS., & BlaszczynskiA. (2011). The appropriateness of using laboratories and student participants in gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9190-4.
- GainsburyS., & BlaszczynskiA. (2012). Harm minimisation in gambling. In R.Pates & D.Riley (Eds.), Harm reduction in substance use and high-risk behaviour: International policy and practice (pp. 263–278). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- GainsburyS. M., RussellA., & BlaszczynskiA. (2014). Are psychology university student gamblers representative of non-university students and general gamblers? A comparative analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9334-9.
- GainsburyS., RussellA., HingN., WoodR., LubmanD., & BlaszczynskiA. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 769–779.
- GallagherT., NickiR., OttesonA., & ElliottH. (2011). Effects of a video lottery terminal (VLT) banner on gambling: A field study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9259-4.
- JacksonA. C., WynneH., DowlingN. A., TomnayJ. E., & ThomasS. A. (2010). Using the CPGI to determine problem gambling prevalence in Australia: Measurement issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9238-9.
- JardinB., & WulfertE. (2009). The use of messages in altering risky gambling behavior in college students: An experimental analogue study. American Journal on Addictions, 18, 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490902786918.
- LadouceurR., & SevignyS. (2003). Interactive messages on video lottery terminals and persistence in gambling. Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 15, 45–50.
- LalandeD. R., & LadouceurR. (2011). Can cybernetics inspire gambling research? A limit-based conceptualization of self-control. International Gambling Studies, 11, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.598540.
- LaugheryK. R., YoungS. L., VaubelK. P., & BrelsfordJr., J. W. (1993). The noticeability of warnings on alcoholic beverage containers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 38–56.
- McMillenJ., & WenzelM. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6, 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790600927845.
- MizerskiR., LeeA., SadequeS., JolleyW., WangS., JiangJ., & OsborneC. (2012). Boomerang effects of gambling warnings exposed to non-problem gamblers. Paper presented at the Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Adelaide, Dec 3-5, 2012. Retrieved from http://anzmac.info/conference/2012/papers/525ANZMACFINAL.pdf.
- MonaghanS. (2008). Review of pop-up messages on electronic gaming machines as a proposed responsible gambling strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9133-1.
- MonaghanS. (2009). Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.008.
- MonaghanS., & BlaszczynskiA. (2007). Recall of electronic gaming machine signs: A static versus a dynamic mode of presentation. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 253–268.
- MonaghanS., & BlaszczynskiA. (2010). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9150-z.
- NealP., DelfabbroP., & O'NealM. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Adelaide: South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.
- NowerL., & BlaszczynskiA. (2010). Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9170-8.
- PettyR. E., & CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling (Vol. 2). Canberra: Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
- SchellinkT., & SchransT. (2002). Atlantic Lottery Corporation video lottery responsible gaming feature research: Final report. Halifax: Focal Research Consultants.
- SteenberghT. A., WhelanJ. P., MeyersA. W., MayR. K., & FloydK. (2004). Impact of warning and brief intervention messages on knowledge of gambling risk, irrational beliefs and behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 4, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1445979042000224377.
- StewartM. J. A., & WohlM. J. (2013). Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: How monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029882.
- WilliamsR. J., & VolbergR. A. (2009). Impact of survey description, administration format, and exclusionary criteria on population prevalence rates of problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790902911653.
- WilliamsR. J., VolbergR. A., & StevensR. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
- WogalterM. S., ConzolaV. C., & Smith-JacksonT. L. (2002). Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00009-1.
- WohlM. J. A., GainsburyS., StewartM. J., & SztainertT. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9340-y.