Modelling of how lotto players select their number combinations dynamically

References

• Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2011). Lottery gambling: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 15–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., & Chie, B. T. (2008). Lottery markets design, micro-structure, and macro-behavior: An ACE approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 463–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C., & Cook, P. (1993). The “Gambler’s fallacy” in lottery play. Management Science, 39, 1521–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. (2004). New light on the long shot bias. Applied Economics, 36, 315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, P., & Clotfelter, C. (1993). The peculiar scale economies of lotto. American Economic Review, 83, 634–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, L., Lanot, G., Hartley, R., & Walker, I. (2000). The demand for lotto: The role of conscious selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 18, 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, L., Morgenroth, E., & Walker, I. (1999). A time series analysis of U.K. lottery sales: Long and short run price elasticities. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 513–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. A. (2001). The psychology of lottery gambling. International Gambling Studies, 1, 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, E. J., & Deistler, M. (1987). The Statistical Theory of Linear Systems. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, H. C., Lee, S. C., & Lin, H. W. (2006). Gambler’s fallacy in the Taiwan lotto market. Taiwan Economic Review, 34, 417–444.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14, 186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren, G., & Lewis, C. (1994). The 2 fallacies of gamblers: Type I and type II. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irvin.
   Google Scholar
• Lien, J. W., & Yuan, J. (2015a). The cross-sectional “gambler’s fallacy”: Set representativeness in lottery number choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 109, 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, J. W., & Yuan, J. (2015b). Selling to biased believers: Strategies of online lottery ticket vendors”. Economic Inquiry, 53, 1506–1521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, J. W., Yuan, J., & Zheng, J. (2018). Representativeness biases and lucky store effects (Working paper). Retreived from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2635427.
   Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S. (2002). Thinking Through Categories (Working Paper). Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Papachristou, G. (2004). The British gambler’s fallacy. Applied Economics, 36, 2073–2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, L., & Humphreys, B. (2013). The “who and why” of lottery: Empirical highlights from the seminal economic literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 915–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 775–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin, M., & Vayanos, D. (2010). The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 730–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 111–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J. (1999). An analysis of the distribution of combinations chosen by UK National Lottery players. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 243–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statman, M. (2002). Lottery players/stock traders. Financial Analysts Journal, 58, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suetens, S., Galbo-Jørgensen, C. B., & Tyran, J. K. (2015). Predicting lotto numbers: A natural experiment on the gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand fallacy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14, 584–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suetens, S., & Tyran, J. R. (2012). The gambler’s fallacy and gender. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83, 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell, D. (1994). A test of the gambler’s fallacy – Evidence from pari-mutuel games. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell, D. (1998). Biases in assessments of probabilities: New evidence from greyhound races. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N. E. (2010). Lottery ticket preferences as indicated by the variation in the number of winners. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 421−439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. V., Potter van Loon, R. J. D., van den Assem, M. J., & van Dolder, D. (2016). Number Preferences in Lotteries. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., Sun, G. Z., & Siu, R. (2014). The lure of illusory luck: How much are people willing to pay for random shocks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106, 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar