Consumer preferences for network liquidity and opponent quality in online poker

References

• Abbott, M. W. (2020). The changing epidemiology of gambling disorder and gambling-related harm: Public health implications. Public Health, 184, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afuah, A. (2013). Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizaki, H. (2012). Basic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in R. Journal of Statistical Software, Code Snippets, 50(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v050.c02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allenby, G. M., Brazell, J. D., Howell, J. R., & Rossi, P. E. (2014). Economic valuation of product features. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 12(4), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-014-9150-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M., & Wright, J. (2007). Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory, 32(2), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Björkegren, D. (2019). The adoption of network goods: evidence from the spread of mobile phones in Rwanda. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 1033–1060. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, D. (2016). 40 is the New 65? Older adults and niche targeting strategies in the online dating industry. Social Sciences, 5(4), 62. Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5040062
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. The Rand Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon, E., & Yin, P. -L. (2011). Competition between exchanges: A research agenda. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C. (2019). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., & Manchanda, P. (2016). Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Science, 35(6), 870–893. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.0976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolican, D., & Barros, B. (2021). The a16z Marketplace 100: 2021. Andreessen Horowitz. https://a16z.com/marketplace-100/
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, Z., & Farronato, C. (2021). Outsourcing tasks online: matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer internet platforms. Management Science, 67(7), 3985–4003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business School Press Books. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201200111
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, I. (2011). The gambling habits of online poker players. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 6(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v6i1.574
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, I., & Wilcke, A. C. (2012). Online poker in the European Union. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 16(1–2), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fradkin, A. (2017). Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: evidence from Airbnb ( SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2939084). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939084
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, W. R., Manchanda, P., Nair, H., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., Hosanagar, K., & Tucker, C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9048-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. In Applied choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781316136232
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, T. P., & Boyle, K. J. (2003). Stated preference methods for valuation of forest attributes. In E. O. Sills & K. L. Abt (Eds.), Forests in a market economy (pp. 321–340). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0219-5_18
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, U., & Sönströd, C. (2009). Fish or Shark: Data mining online poker. In 5th International Conference on Data Mining-DMIN 09, Las Vegas, USA. CSREA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, U., & Wright, J. (2006). Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B., Albuquerque, P., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (2010). Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Science, 29(6), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. -S., & Kwon, N. (2003). The advantage of network size in acquiring new subscribers: A conditional logit analysis of the Korean mobile telephony market. Information Economics and Policy, 15(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knote, R., & Blohm, I. 2016. Deconstructing the sharing economy: On the relevance for is research: Vol. Bd. 1. In V. Nissen, D. Stelzer, S. Straßburger, & D. Fischer (Eds.). Universitätsverlag Ilmenau. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/247801/
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006). Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: complex networks and local bias. Management Science, 52(12), 1838–1848. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAdam, T. (n.d.). Stars Rewards Explained: Calculating PokerStars Chests Rakeback. TopPokerValue. Retrieved August 8, 2022, from https://toppokervalue.com/poker-articles/latest-poker-news/pokerstars-chests-rakeback
   Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028592
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, M., & Ye, M. (2011). Is market fragmentation harming market quality? Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management science, 51(10), 1494–1504. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philander, K. S., Tabri, N., Wood, R., & Wohl, M. (2022). Casino proximity, visit frequency, and gambling problems. International Gambling Studies, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2035423
   Google Scholar
• pokernewsdotcom (Director). (2013, August 20). How to Play Texas Hold’em for Beginners. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9HYxquQt-M
   Google Scholar
• Quaife, M., Terris-Prestholt, F., DiTanna, G. L., & Vickerman, P. (2018). How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity. The European Journal of Health Economics, 19(8), 1053–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. -C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two sided markets. The European Economic Journal\ldots. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
   Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. -C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfs, J. (1974). A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003090
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. P., & Tucker, C. (2012). Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10(1), 63–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-011-9109-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysman, M. (2004). Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 483–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysman, M. (2019). The reflection problem in network effect estimation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalensee, R. (2011). Jeffrey Rohlfs’ 1974 model of facebook: An introduction (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1802053). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1802053
   Google Scholar
• Siler, K. (2010). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9168-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobolewski, M., & Czajkowski, M. (2012). Network effects and preference heterogeneity in the case of mobile telecommunications markets. Telecommunications Policy, 36(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M. (2021). Estimating platform market power in two-sided markets with an application to magazine advertising. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13(2), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20160052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, S., Manchanda, P., Bravo, M. E., Chu, J., Ma, L., Song, M., Shriver, S., & Subramanian, U. (2015). Platforms: A multiplicity of research opportunities. Marketing Letters, 26(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/258464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. (2008). Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management science, 54(12), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Damme, E. (2007). Liberalising gambling markets: lessons from network industries?. Tilburg University Research Portal. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/liberalising-gambling-markets-lessons-from-network-industries/fingerprints/
   Google Scholar
• van Damme, E. (2008). Closing remarks: How specific is the regulation of gambling? In T. Coryn, C. J. C. F. Fijnaut, & A. Littler (Eds.), Economic aspects of gambling regulation: EU and US perspectives (pp. 185–195). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165595.i-208.56
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2014). Poker VPIP. https://www.thepokerbank.com/articles/software/vpip/
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (1979). Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica, 47(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyl, E. G. (2010). A price theory of multi-sided platforms. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1642–1672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar