Problem gambling in Germany: results of a mixed-mode population survey in 2021

References

• Abbott, M. W. (2020). The changing epidemiology of gambling disorder and gambling related harm: Public health implications. Public Health, 184, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. E. G., Blumberg, S. J., Brick, J. M., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennis, J. M., Dillman, D. O. N., Frankel, M. R., Garland, P., Groves, R. M., Kennedy, C., Krosnick, J. O. N., Lavrakas, P. J., Lee, S., Link, M., Piekarski, L., Rao, K., Thomas, R. K., & Zahs, D. A. N. (2010). Aapor report on online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(4), 711–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banz, M. (2019). Glücksspielverhalten und Glücksspielsucht in Deutschland. Ergebnisse des Surveys 2019 und Trends [Gambling behavior and gambling addiction in Germany. Results of the 2019 survey and trends]. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Köln.
   Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J. (2016). Solving the nonresponse problem with sample matching? Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315573926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binde, P. (2011). What are the most harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys. Center for Public Sector Research, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, B. (2008). Mixed mode: The only ‘fitness’ regime? International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Greer, N., Armstrong, T., Doran, C., Kinchin, I., Langham, E., & Rockloff, M. (2017). The social cost of gambling to Victoria. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Rawat, V., Tulloch, C., Murray-Boyle, C., & Rockloff, M. (2021). The evolution of gambling-related harm measurement: Lessons from the last decade. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühringer, G., Kraus, L., Sonntag, D., Pfeiffer-Gerschel, T., & Steiner, S. (2007). Pathologisches Glücksspiel in Deutschland:Spiel- und Bevölkerungsrisiken. Sucht, 53(5), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1024/2007.05.06
   Google Scholar
• Buth, S., Meyer, G., & Kalke, J. (2022). Glücksspielteilnahme und glücksspielbezogene Probleme in der Bevölkerung. Ergebnisse des Glücksspiel-Survey 2021 [Gambling participation and gambling-related problems in the population. Results of the Gambling Survey 2021]. Institut für interdisziplinäre Sucht- und Drogenforschung (ISD).
   Google Scholar
• Buth, S., & Stöver, H. (2008). Glücksspielteilnahme und Glücksspielprobleme in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativbefragung [Gambling participation and gambling problems in Germany: results of a nationwide representative survey]. Suchttherapie, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1042440
   Google Scholar
• Calado, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Problem gambling worldwide: An update and systematic review of empirical research (2000–2015). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(4), 592–613. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutwin, D., & Lavrakas, P. (2016). Trends in telephone outcomes, 2008–2015. Survey Practice, 9(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2016-0017
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. (2000). Developing the DSM-IV-DSM-IV criteria to identify adolescent problem gambling in non-clinical populations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009437115789
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgiadou, E., Müller, A., Koopmann, A., Leménager, Hillemacher, T., Kiefer, F., & Leménager, T. (2021). Changes in gambling behavior during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. International Gambling Studies, 22(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/144597995.2021.1956562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, B., Soebbing, B., & Williams, R. (2009). Online vs telephone surveys: Methodological issues for gambling research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228461859
   Google Scholar
• infratest dimap (2022). DeutschlandTrend. Eine repräsentative Studie zur politischen Stimmung im Auftrag der ARD-Tagesthemen und der Tageszeitung DIE WELT [ARD-DeutschlandTrend. A representative study of political sentiment commissioned by ARD-Tagesthemen and the daily newspaper DIE WELT]: infratest dimap, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Kalke, J., Buth, S., Rosenkranz, M., Schütze, C., Öchsler, H., & Verthein, U. (2011). Glücksspiel und Spielerschutz in Österreich: Empirische Erkenntnisse zum Spielverhalten der Bevölkerung und zur Prävention der Glücksspielsucht [Gambling and player protection in Austria: empirical findings on the gambling behavior of the population and the prevention of gambling addiction]. Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Kalke, J., Buth, S., Thon, N., & Wurst, F. M. (2018). Glücksspielverhalten der österreichischen Bevölkerung und ihre Akzeptanz von Spielerschutzmaßnahmen – Ergebnisse der Repräsentativbefragungen 2009 und 2015 [Gambling and player protection in Austria: results of the representative surveys 2009 and 2015]. Suchttherapie, 19(01), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-121996
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, L., Sassen, M., Pabst, A., & Bühringer, G. (2010). Kurzbericht Epidemiologischer Suchtsurvey 2009. zusatzauswertungen zum Glücksspielverhalten: Prävalenz des (pathologischen) Glücksspiels [Brief report on the epidemiological survey on addiction 2009. Additional analyses of gambling behavior: Prevalence of (pathological) gambling]. IFT Institut für Therapieforschung.
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Gray, H. M. (2014). Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. -K., Back, K. -J., Williams, R. J., & Ahn, S. -S. (2015a). Comparison of telephone RDD and online panel survey modes on CPGI scores and co-morbidities. International Gambling Studies, 15(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2015.1068353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. -K., Back, K. -J., Williams, R. J., & Ahn, S. -S. (2015b). Comparison of telephone RDD and online panel survey modes on CPGI scores and co-morbidities. International Gambling Studies, 15(3), 435–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesieur, H., & Blume, S. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazar, A., Zorn, M., Becker, N., & Volberg, R. A. (2020). Gambling formats, involvement, and problem gambling: Which types of gambling are more risky? BMC Public Health, 20(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08822-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. (2021). Glücksspiel – Zahlen und Fakten. In: Jahrbuch Sucht 2021, Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen (Hrsg.), S.115-134 [Gambling - facts and figures. In: Jahrbuch Sucht 2021, Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen (ed.), pp.115-134]. Pabst.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G., & Bachmann, M. (2017). Spielsucht: Ursachen, Therapie und Prävention von glücksspielbezogenem Suchtverhalten (4. Aufl.) [Gambling addiction: Causes, treatment, and prevention of gambling-related addictive behavior (4th ed.)]. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., Häfeli, J., & Mörsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.584890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2021). Schadensbegrenzung beim Glücksspiel: Eine Aufgabe für die öffentliche Gesundheitsfürsorge [Harm reduction in gambling: a public health task]. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-021-00924-y
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., Rumpf, H. -J., Kreuzer, A., de Brito, S., Glorius, S., Jeske, C., Kastirke, N., Porz, S., Schön, D., Westram, A., Klinger, D., Goeze, C., Bischof, G., & John, U. (2011). Pathologisches Glücksspiel und Epidemiologie (PAGE): Entstehung, Komorbidität, Remission und Behandlung. Endbericht [Pathological Gambling and Epidemiology (PAGE): Emergence, comorbidity, remission, and treatment. final report]. Research Association INTerventions in health and risky behaviors, University of Greifswald/Lübeck.
   Google Scholar
• Nower, L., Volberg, R., & Caler, K. R. (2017). The prevalence of online and land‐based gambling in New Jersey. Report to the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement.,
   Google Scholar
• Pallesen, S., Mentzoni, R. A., Torsheim, T., Erevik, E., Molde, A., & Morken, A. M. (2020). Omfang av penge- og dataspillproblemer i Norge 2019 [Prevalence of gambling and video game problems in Norway 2019]. University of Bergen. https://www.uib.no/sites/w3.uib.no/files/attachments/omfang_av_penge-og_dataspillproblemer_i_norge_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, D., & Blaszczynski, A. (2021). Paid online convenience samples in gambling studies: Questionable data quality. International Gambling Studies, 21(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2021.1884735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. M. T., Browne, M., Hing, N., Rockloff, M., & Newall, P. (2021). Are any samples representative or unbiased? Reply to Pickering and Blaszczynski. International Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2021.1973535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. M. T., Hing, N., & Browne, M. (2019). Risk factors for gambling problems specially associated with sports betting. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(4), 1211–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09848-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, M., Kraus, L., Bühringer, G., Pabst, A., Piontek, D., & Taqi, Z. (2011). Gambling among adults in Germany: Prevalence, disorder and risk factors. Sucht, 57(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911.a000115
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, B., Brakel, J., Buelens, B., Giesen, D., Luiten, A., & Meertens, V. (2021). Mixed-mode official surveys: Design and analysis. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleczka, P., Braun, B., Piontek, D., Bühringer, G., & Kraus, L. (2015). DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder: Underlying structure and applicability to specific groups of gamblers. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillemyndigheden. (2022). Prævalensundersøgelse af pengespil og ludomani i Danmark 2021 [Prevalence study of gambling and gambling problems in Denmark 2021]. https://www.spillemyndigheden.dk/uploads/2022-05/Pr%C3%A6valensunders%C3%B8gelse%20af%20pengespil%20og%20ludomani%20i%20Danmark%202021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00158-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchfield, R., McCready, J., Turner, N. E., Jimenez-Murcia, S., Petry, N. M., Grant, J., Welte, J., Chapman, H., & Winters, K. C. (2016). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder and comparison to DSM-IV. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(3), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P. (2020). An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom. Department of Methodology, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Kuha, J. (2022). How survey mode affects estimates of the prevalence of gambling harm: A multisurvey study. Public Health, 204, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, H., Reith, G., Langham, E., & Rogers, R. D. (2019). Gambling and public health: We need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ, 3651807, https://doi.org/10.113/bmj/I1807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, R., & Volberg, R. (2013). Gambling and problem gambling in Ontario. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2011). A comparative profile of the internet gambler: Demographic characteristics, game-play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810397650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar