Birth control: Power/knowledge in the politics of birth

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2010). News release. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2010/Ob_Gyns_Issue_Less_Restrictive_VBAC_Guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Arney, W. R. (1982). Power and the profession of obstetrics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Association. (2005). Independent nurse practitioners. Position Statement. Retrieved from https://ama.com.au/position-statement/independent-nurse-practitioners-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Association. (2008). Submission to the maternity services review. Retrieved from http://ama.com.au/node/4225
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. (2000). Homebirth bound: Mending the broken weave. Hamilton, New Zealand: Birthspirit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, L. (2008). A feminist history of Australian midwifery from colonisation until the 1980s. Women and Birth, 21, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, C., Zadoroznyj, M., Hallgrimsdottir, H., Treloar, A., & Taylor, K. (2010). Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 71, 475–481.
   Google Scholar
• Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. (2011). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 343, d7400.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton, R., & Peterson, A. (1997). Foucault’s medicine. In R. Bunton & A. Peterson (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. 1–15). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, H. A. (2001). Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: An historical analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 334–342.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., & MacFarlane, A. (1994). Where to be born? The debate and the evidence (5th ed.). Oxford, England: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Campo, M. (2010). Trust, power and agency in childbirth: Women’s relationships with obstetricians. Outskirts, 22, Retrieved from http://www.outskirts.arts.uwa.edu.au/volumes/volume-22/campo
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, D. (2006). Medical dominance then and now: Critical reflections. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), 432–443. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.432
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Report of the maternity services review. Canberra, ACT: Department of Health and Ageing. Retrieved from Improving Maternity Services in Australia –Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk, M. (2000). The midwife: A professional servant? In M. Kirkham (Ed.), The midwife–mother relationship (pp. 19–27). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cwikel, J. (2008). Lessons from Semmelweis: A social epidemiologic update on safe motherhood. Social Medicine, 3, 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Daellenbach, R., & Edwards, N. (2011). How can birth activism contribute to sustaining change for better birthing for women, families and societies in the new millennium? In L. Davies, R. Daellenbach, & M. Kensington (Eds.), Sustainability, Midwifery and birth (pp. 218–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. (2012). Radio interview. Retrieved from http://www.ncah.com.au/news-events/midwives-push-for-homebirthing-choice/1263/.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H., Schmied, V., Tracy, S. K., Jackson, M., Cummings, J., & Priddis, H. (2011). Home birth and the National Australian Maternity Services Review: Too hot to handle? Women and Birth, 24, 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Dant, T. (1991). Knowledge, Ideology and discourse: A sociological perspective. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (2008). ‘She did what she could…’ childbirth and midwifery practice in queensland 1859 –1912. Coopers Plains, QLD: Book Pal.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Walker, K. (2010). Re-discovering the material body in midwifery through an exploration of theories of embodiment. Midwifery, 26, 457–462.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (1994). The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1125–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2008). ‘Foreword’. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (2nd ed.) (pp. ix–xv). Sydney, NSW: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R., & Davis, E. (1997). Intuition as authoritative knowledge in midwifery and home birth. In R. Davis-Floyd & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 315–349). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Costa, C. (2002). ‘The contagiousness of childbed fever’: A short history of puerperal sepsis and its treatment. Medical Journal of Australia, 177, 668–671.
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge, A., Mesman, J. A. J. M., Manniën, J., Zwart, J. J., van Dillen, J., & van Roosmalen, J. (2013). Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: Nationwide cohort study. British Medical Journal, 346, f3263.
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge, A., van der Goes, B. Y., Ravelli, A. C. J., Amelink-Verburg, M. P., Mol, B. W., Nijhuis, J. G., … Buitendijk, S. E. (2009). Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 lowrisk planned home and hospital births. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116(9), 1177–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and medical men: A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth. London, England: Historical Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Downe, S., & McCourt, C. (2008). From being to becoming: Reconstructing childbirth knowledges. In S. Downe (Ed.), Normal childbirth: Evidence and debate (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–27). Sydney, NSW: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, N. (2000). Women planning homebirths: Their own views on their relationships with midwives. In M. Kirkham (Ed.), The midwife–mother relationship (pp. 55–91). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1973). Witches, midwives and nurses: A history of women healers. New York, NY: The Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, K. (2002). Reflecting on practice to theorise empowerment for women: Using Foucault’s concepts. Australian Journal of Midwifery, 15, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Finding of Inquest. (2012), South Australian Coroner’s Court. Retrieved from http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/CoronersFindings/Pages/Findings-for-2012.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). Brighton, England: The Harvester Press. (Original work published 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought (pp. 51–75). Camberwell, England: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991a). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53–72). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991b). Questions of method: Why the prison? In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73–86). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991c). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, England: Penguin. (Original work published 1975)
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). The birth of the clinic. London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The history of sexuality: Volume 1. Melbourne, VIC: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, J., & Vernon, B. (2007). Midwifery in Australia: Emerging from the Shadows. In L. Reid (Ed.), Midwifery: Freedom to practise? (pp. 30–50). Sydney, NSW: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Glezerman, M. (2006). Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, P. A., Lee, S. K., Ryan, E. M., & Etches, D. J. (2002). Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166(3), 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, P. A., Saxell, L., Page, L., Klein, M. C., & Liston, R. M. (2009). Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 181(6/7), 377–383.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, R., Newburn, M., & Macfarlane, A. (2002). Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? British Medical Journal, 324, 892–895.
   Google Scholar
• Keirse, M. J. (2002). Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies? Birth, 29, 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kotaska, A. (2004). Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: Case study of vaginal breech delivery. British Medical Journal, 30, 1039–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2006). The plasticity of professional boundaries: A case study of collaborative care in maternity services. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 341–352. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.4.341
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2012). Dreaming the impossible dream: Ordering risks in Australian maternity care policies. Health Sociology Review, 21(1), 23–35. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2012.21.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, E. (1988). Theoretical considerations for the study of the doctor–patient relationship: Implications of a perinatal study. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 2, 34–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lecky-Thompson, M. (1995). Independent midwifery in Australia. In T. Murphy-Black (Ed.), Issues in midwifery (pp. 41–61). London, England: Churchill-Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Zeki, R., Hilder, L., & Sullivan, E. A. (2012). Australia’s mothers and babies 2010. Perinatal statistics series no. 27. Catalogue No. PER 57. Canberra, ACT: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129542376
   Google Scholar
• MacColl, M. (2009). The birth wars. St. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2004). Tradition as a political symbol in the new midwifery in Canada. In I. Bourgeoult, C. Benoit, & R. Davis-Floyd (Eds.), Reconceiving midwifery (pp. 46–66). London, England: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, J. (2003). Rethinking women’s birth experience: Medical frameworks and personal narratives. Hecate, 29, 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• McCoyd, J. (2010). Authoritative knowledge, the technological imperative and women’s responses to prenatal diagnostic technologies. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 34, 590–614.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, M., Francis, K., & Chapman, Y. (2012). Primary maternity care reform: Whose influence is driving the change? Midwifery, 28, e705–e711.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998). Reading birth and death: A history of obstetric thinking. Cork, Ireland: Cork University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers-Cieko, J. (1988). Direct-entry midwifery in the USA. In S. Kitzenger (Ed.), The midwife challenge (pp. 61–84). London, England: Pandora Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, E. (2010). Midwifery directions: The Australian maternity services review. Health Sociology Review, 19(2), 245–259. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.2.245
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb: A history of the medical care of pregnant women. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, O., & Clausen, J. A. (2012). Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth (Review), The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
   Google Scholar
• Papps, E. & Olssen, M. (1997). Doctoring childbirth and regulating midwifery in New Zealand: A Foucauldian perspective. Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, B. (2012). Truth is, we really haven’t come a long way, baby. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/society-and-culture/truth-is-we-really-havent-come-a-long-way-baby-20121019-27wrv.html
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, S. (1997). Midwifery and Medicine: Gendered knowledge in the practice of delivery. In H. Marland & A. Rafferty (Eds.), Midwives, Society and Childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period (pp. 218–231). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reiger, K. (2006). A neoliberal quickstep: Contradictions in Australian maternity policy. Health Sociology Review, 15, 330–340.
   Google Scholar
• Reiger, K. (2010). ‘Knights’ or ‘Knaves’? Public policy, professional power, and reforming maternity services. Health Care for Women International, 32(1), 2–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1998). Medicine, history and the present. In C. Jones & R. Porter (Eds.), Reassessing Foucault: Power, medicine and the body (pp. 48–72). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2011). Homebirth position statement. Retrieved from http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/womens-health/statements-aguidelines/college-statements-and-guidelines. html?showall=&start=1
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Midwives. (2007). Joint statement no 2. Retrieved from http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/home-births
   Google Scholar
• Summers, A. (1995). ‘For I have ever so much faith in her ability as a nurse’: The eclipse of the community midwife in South Australia (PhD thesis). Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2007). Australian health care reform: A place for nurse practitioners? Australian Nursing Journal, 31, 274–281.
   Google Scholar
• Tousijn, W. (2006). Beyond decline: Consumerism, managerialism and the need for a new medical professionalism. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), 469–480. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.469
   Google Scholar
• Towler, J., & Bramall, J. (1986). Midwives in history and society. London, England: Croon Helm.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. (2011). The state of the world’s midwifery: Delivering health, saving lives. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/sowmy/report/home.html
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2001). Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 75, S25–S37.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. J. (2010). Childbirth embodiment: Problematic aspects of current understandings. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32, 486–501.
   Google Scholar
• Wendland, C. (2007). The vanishing mother: Caesarean section and ‘evidence-based obstetrics’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 21, 218–233.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegers, T. A., Keirse, M. J. N. C., van der Zee, J., & Berghs, G. A. H. (1996). Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: Prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands. British Medical Journal, 313(7068), 1309–1313.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (1997). The controlling power of childbirth in Britain. In H. Marland & A. Rafferty (Eds.), Midwives, society and childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period (pp. 232–247). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. (1989). Medical dominance (2nd ed.). Sydney, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. (2006). Introduction: Taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), 421–431. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.421
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit. (1996). Care in normal birth. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/who_frh_msm_9624/en/index.html
   Google Scholar