761
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How to live with a taboo instead of ‘breaking it’. Alternative empowerment strategies of people with incontinence

&
Pages 38-47 | Received 13 Aug 2013, Accepted 25 Jul 2014, Published online: 27 Feb 2015

References

  • Albrecht, G. J., Seelman, K. D., & Bury, M. (2001). Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage Publications.
  • Bradway, C. W., & Barg, F. (2006). Developing a cultural model of long-term female urinary incontinence. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 3150–3161. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.012
  • Davis, L. J. (Ed.) (1997). The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge.
  • Garcia, F. A., Crocker, J., & Wyman, J. F. (2005). Breaking the cycle of stigmatization. Managing the stigma of incontinence in social interactions. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 32(1), 38–52. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200501000-00009
  • Gill, C. (2001). Divided understandings. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 351–373). London: Sage Publications.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hayder, D. & Schnepp, W. (2010). Experiencing and managing urinary incontinence: A qualitative study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 32(4), 480–496. doi: 10.1177/0193945909354903
  • Hendriks, R. (1998). Egg timers, human values and the care of autistic youths. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(4), 399–424. doi: 10.1177/016224399802300403
  • Hughes, B. (2009). Disability activisms: Social model stalwarts and biological citizens. Disability & Society, 24(6), 677–688. doi: 10.1080/09687590903160118
  • Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12, 325–340. doi: 10.1080/09687599727209
  • Mitteness, L. S., & Barker, J. C. (1995). Stigmatizing a “normal” condition: Urinary incontinence in late life. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9, 188–210. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.2.02a00050
  • Norton, C. (2004). Nurses, bowel continence, stigma, and taboos. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 31(2), 85–94. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200403000-00008
  • Ostaszkiewicz, J., O'Conell, B., & Dunning, T. (2011). Residents’ perspectives on urinary incontinence: a review of literature. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 761–772.
  • Paterson, J. S. et al. (2003). Selection of continence products: Perspectives of people who have incontinence and their carers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(7), 955–963. doi: 10.1080/096382809210142211
  • Pols, J. (2005). Enacting appreciations: Beyond the patient perspective. Health Care Analysis, 13, 203–220. doi: 10.1007/s10728-005-6448-6
  • Pols, J. (2010a). Breath-taking practicalities: A politics of embodied patent positions. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13, 189–206. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2010.490726
  • Pols, J. (2010b). Bringing bodies -and health care- back in. Exploring practical knowledge for living with chronic disease. Medische Antropologie, 22, 413–425.
  • Robinson, J. P. (2000). Managing urinary incontinence in the nursing home: Residents' perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 68–77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01258.x
  • Shakespeare, T. (Ed.) (2001). The disability reader. Social science perspectives. London and New York: Cassell.
  • Shaw, C. (2001). A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behaviour and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(1), 15–24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00443.x
  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage Publications.
  • Wengraf, T., & Chamberlayne, P. (2006). Interviewing for life histories, lived situations and experience: The biographic-narrative interpretive method (BNIM). A short guide to BNIM interviewing and practice. Version, 6.
  • Winance, M. (2007). Being normally different? Changes to normalisation processes: From alignment to work on the norm. Disability & Society, 22, 625–638. doi: 10.1080/09687590701560261
  • Zitzelsberger, H. (2005). (In)visibility: Accounts of embodiment of women with physical disabilities and differences. Disability and Society, 20, 389–403. doi: 10.1080/09687590500086492

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.