Public and private families: a comparative thematic analysis of the intersections of social norms and scrutiny

References

• Adopt Change. (2015). Modern families: Attitudes and perceptions of Adoption in Australia. Retrieved from Adopt Change http://www.adoptchange.org.au/Assets/714/1/FINAL-AdoptChange-ResearchAugust2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Births, Australia, 2013 (cat. no. 3301.0). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics & WELSTAT. (1982). Adoptions, Australia 1979–80 (cat. no. 4406.0). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (1998). Child protection Australia 1996–97 (AIHW cat. no. CWS 5. Child Welfare Series no. 21). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2001). Adoptions Australia 1999–00 (AIHW cat. no. CWS 12. Child Welfare Series no. 26). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014a). Adoptions Australia 2013–14 (Child welfare series no. 60. Cat. no. CWS 51). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014b). Child protection Australia 2012–13 (Child Welfare series no. 58. Cat. no. CWS 49). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomaeus, C., & Riggs, D. W. (2016). Terms of endearment: Meanings of family in a diverse sample of Australian parents. In R. Harding, R. Fletcher, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Revaluing care in theory, law and policy: Cycles and connections. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S. L., Jackson, D., Halcomb, E. J., & Wilkes, L. (2012). The stigma of being a long-term foster carer. Journal of Family Nursing, 18(2), 234–260. doi:10.1177/1074840711423913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballo, R., Lansford, J. E., Abbey, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Gaining a child: Comparing the experiences of biological parents, adoptive parents, and stepparents. Family Relations, 53(1), 38–48. doi:10.1111/j.1741–3729.2004.00007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidis, D., & Cook, R. (2012). Australian perspectives on surrogacy: The influence of cognitions, psychological and demographic characteristics. Human Reproduction, 27(4), 1080–1087. doi:10.1093/humrep/der470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, D. (2010). Beyond apologies: Historical reflections on policy and practice relating to the out-of-home care of children in contemporary Australia. Children Australia, 35(2), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, D., & Critchley, C. (2010). Comfort with use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for family formation by same-sex and heterosexual couples: A survey of Australian social attitudes. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 6(2), 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Immigration and Citizenship. (2012). Citizenship by descent applications granted to infants by India and USA posts. 1/1/2008 to 31/12/2011. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, G. L. (1999). Families in the media: Reflections on the public scrutiny of private behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 821–830. doi:10.2307/354005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Marks, A., & Jadva, V. (2011). Families created through surrogacy: Mother–child relationships and children's psychological adjustment at age 7. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1579–1588. doi:10.1037/a0025292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., & Straight, B. (2005). Living stigma: The impact of labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination in the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families. Sociological Inquiry, 75(2), 197–215. doi:10.1111/j.1475–682X.2005.00119.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, C., Myong, L., Adrian, S. W., & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (Eds.). (2015). Critical kinship studies. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Zeki, R., Hilder, L., & Sullivan, E. A. (2013). Australia's mothers and babies 2011 (Perinatal statistics series no. 28. Cat. no. PER 59). Canberra: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Macaldowie, A., Wang, Y. A., Chughtai, A. A., & Chambers, G. M. (2014). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia & New Zealand 2012. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. (2013). An exploratory study of risks to stability in foster and kinship care in NSW: Final report (SPRC Report 19/2013). Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, L. (2006). The lives of foster carers: Private sacrifices, public restrictions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2015). Child protection services. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved November 22, 2015, from http://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2015/community-services/child-protection/government-services-2015-volumef-chapter15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2013). Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of offshore surrogacy. Citizenship Studies, 17, 956–969. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.851145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2014). ‘The contented faces of a unique Australian family’: Privilege and vulnerability in news media reporting of offshore surrogacy arrangements. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 869–872. doi:10.1080/14680777.2014.952874
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Peel, E. (in-press). Critical kinship studies: An introduction to the field. Hampshire: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(11), 877–880. doi: 10.1016/S0190-7409(02)00238-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, I. J., & Lee, C. (2010). ‘The silence was deafening’: Social and health service support after miscarriage. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28(3), 274–286. doi:10.1080/02646831003587346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzkoff, J., Rintoul, D., Grealy, C., & Corrigall, D. (2006). Spotlight on safety: Community attitudes to child protection, foster care and parenting. Ashfield: NSW Department of Community Services.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, K. H., Boivin, J., Hay, D., van den Bree, M. B. M., Rice, F. J., Harold, G. T., & Thapar, A. (2009). Examining differences in psychological adjustment problems among children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(5), 385–392. doi:10.1177/0165025409338444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storck, S. (2012, 11 August). Miscarriage. Retrieved from Medline Plus http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001488.htm
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the future: Anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., & Ballard, R. L. (2009). ‘How much did you pay for her?’ Decision-making criteria underlying adoptive parents’ responses to inappropriate remarks. Journal of Family Communication, 9(2), 107–125. doi:10.1080/15267430902773253
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, T. T. (2004). Mothering for the state: Foster parenting and the challenges of government-contracted carework. Gender and Society, 18(5), 567–587. doi:10.1177/0891243204267778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. (2001). The erosion of citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 189–209. doi:10.1080/00071310120044944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiquette-Tessier, S. C., Vandette, M. P., & Gosselin, J. (2015). Is family structure a cue for stereotyping? A systematic review of stereotypes and parenthood. Journal of Family Studies, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13229400.2015.1049955
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Chen, C., Wang, L., Chen, D., Guang, W., & French, J. (2003). Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: A population-based prospective study. Fertility & Sterility, 79(3), 577–584. doi:10.1016/S0015–0282(02)04694–0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. A., Chambers, G., Dieng, M., & Sullivan, E. A. (2009). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2007 (Assisted reproduction technology series no. 13. Cat. no. PER 47). Canberra: AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, D. J. (2008). The concept of family: An analysis of laypeople's views of family. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1426–1447. doi:10.1177/0192513X08318488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar