Professionalism and person-centredness: developing a practice-based approach to leadership within NHS maternity services in the UK

References

• Ashman, I. (2008). Deep acting and bad faith: A Sartrean treatment of emotion work. International Journal of Work. Organisation and Emotion, 2(3), 288–304. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2008.019427
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W. J. (2011). The incommensurability of nursing as a practice and the customer service model: An evolutionary threat to the discipline. Nursing Philosophy, 12, 158–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00492.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. (2005). Making up managers: The case of NHS nurses. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 5–23. doi: 10.1177/0950017005051278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2008). Trusting in the new NHS: Instrumental versus communicative action. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(3), 349–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01065.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D. A., Denyer, D., Jaina, J., Kelliher, C., Moore, C., Parry, E., Pilbeam, C. (2013). How do they manage? A qualitative study of the realities of middle and front-line management work in health care. Health Services Delivery Research, 1(4), 1–248. doi: 10.3310/hsdr01040
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., & Currie, G. (2013). The knowledge brokering role of the hybrid middle level manager: The case of healthcare. British Journal of Management, 24, S132–S142. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12028
   Google Scholar
• Byrom, S., & Downe, S. (2010). ‘She sort of shines’: Midwives’ accounts of ‘good’ midwifery and ‘good’ leadership. Midwifery, 26, 126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission. (2011). Dignity and nutrition inspection programme. A national overview. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report_final_update.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission. (2013). National findings from the 2013 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.cqg.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/maternyt_report_for_publications.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Lockett, A. (2011). Distributing leadership in health and social care: Concertive, conjoint or collective? International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 286–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C. (2004). Regulating the healthcare workforce: Next steps for research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 9 (Suppl. 1), 55–61. doi: 10.1258/135581904322724149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies, L., Daellenbach, R., & Kensington, M. (2011). Sustainability, midwifery and birth. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75(Suppl. 1), S5–S23. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00510-0
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R. (2005). An action research study exploring midwives’ support needs and the effect of group clinical supervision. Midwifery, 21, 161–176. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deery, R. (2010). Transfers from midwife led to obstetric led care: Some insights from midwives. Essentially MIDIRS, 1(3), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R., & Fisher, P. (2010). ‘Switching and swapping faces’: Performativity and emotion in midwifery. International Journal of Work, Organisation and Emotion, 3(3), 270–286. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2010.032926
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R., & Hughes, D. (2004). Supporting midwife-led care through action research: A tale of mess, muddle and birth balls. Evidence Based Midwifery, 2(2), 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R., Hughes, D., & Kirkham, M. (2010). Tensions and barriers to improving maternity care: The story of a struggling birth centre. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R., & Hunter, B. (2010). Emotion work and relationships in midwifery: Enhancing or challenging? In M. Kirkham (Ed.), The midwife-mother relationship (2nd ed., pp. 37–54). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Divall, B. (2015). Negotiating competing discourses in narratives of midwifery leadership in the English NHS. Midwifery, 31(11), 1060–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, F. (2005). A critical ethnographic study of encounters between midwives and breast-feeding women in postnatal wards in England. Midwifery, 21(3), 241–252. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 406–422. doi: 10.1177/0011392111402585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahy, K., Foureur, M., & Hastie, C. (2008). Birth territory and midwifery guardianship. London: Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, P., Richens, Y., & Calder, A. (2010). Final report. Review of Maternity Services in University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://councilportal.cumbria.gov.uk/documents/s11611/4%20Maternity%20Report%20-%20Fielding%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). ‘Outing’ the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531–545. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., & Byrne, V. (2012). Identity, emotion and the internal goods of practice: A study of learning disability professionals. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34(1), 79–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01365.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., & Freshwater, D. (2014). Towards compassionate care through aesthetic rationality. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28(4), 767–774. doi: 10.1111/scs.12109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., and Lees, J. (2015). Narrative and mental health: preserving the emancipatory tradition. Health, 1–17. DOI: 10.1177/1363459315600774
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, R. (2002). Clinical governance and governmentality. Health, Risk and Society, 4(2), 155–173. doi: 10.1080/13698570220137042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry. London: Stationery Office. Retrieved from tinyurl.com/HMSO-Francis2
   Google Scholar
• Girvin, J. (1996). Leadership and nursing: Part two: Styles of leadership. Nursing Management, 3(2), 20–21. doi: 10.7748/nm.3.2.20.s19
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. (2013). Developing a culture of compassionate care – the midwife’s voice? Midwifery, 29, 269–271. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C. (2003). Improving the performance of health services: The role of clinical leadership. The Lancet, 361(9373), 1978–1980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13593-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography, principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. (2014). Humanising healthcare, patterns of hope for a system under strain. Devon: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins Martin, C. J., & Bull, P. (2006). What features of the maternity unit promote obedient behaviour from midwives? Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 9, e221–e231. doi: 10.1016/j.cein.2006.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Hollins Martin, C. J., & Bull, P. (2010). The situational argument: Do midwives agree or acquiesce with senior staff? Journal of Infant and Reproductive Psychology, 28(2), 180–190. doi: 10.1080/02646830903229876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., Deery, R., & Lovatt, A. (2002). A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery. Midwifery, 18, 43–52. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (1991). Power in the caring professions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. C., & Symonds, A. (1995). The social meaning of midwifery. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, B. (2004). Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery. Midwifery, 21, 253–266. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, B., & Deery, R. (2009). Emotions in midwifery & reproduction. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, B., & Warren, L. (2013). Investigating resilience in midwifery. Final report. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A., & Roche-Reid, B. (2004). Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: Implications for the role of the midwife. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2613–2623. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, M. (1999). The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(3), 732–739. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, M. (Ed.). (2004). Informed choice in maternity care. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, M. (Ed.). (2010). The midwife-mother relationship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, M., & Stapleton, H. (2000). Midwives’ support needs as childbirth changes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 465–472. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01497.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkup, B. (2015). The report of the Morecambe Bay investigation. Retrieved July 21, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/morecambe-bay-investigation-report
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigour: The case for reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 882–890. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00725.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotaska, A. (2011). Guideline-centered care: A two-edged sword. Birth, 38, 97–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00469.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1981/2007). After virtue (3rd ed.). London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, R. (2007). Caesarean: Just another way of birth? Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, R., & Murphy Lawless, J. (2013). The politics of maternity. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P., & Waring, J. (2012). Leading from the middle: Constrained realities of clinical leadership in healthcare organizations. Health (London). doi:10.1177/1363459312460704
   Google Scholar
• McAra-Couper, J., Gilkison, A., Crowther, S., Hunter, M., Hotchin, C., & Gunn, J. (2014). Partnership and reciprocity with women sustain lead maternity carer midwives in practice. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 49, 29–33. doi: 10.12784/nzcomjnl49.2014.5.29-33
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, C., & Stevens, T. (2009). Relationship and reciprocity in caseload midwifery. In B. Hunter & R. Deery (Eds.), Emotions in midwifery & reproduction (pp. 17–35). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, L., Charles, K., Dixon-Woods, M., Willars, J., & Martin, G. (2013). ‘New’ and distributed leadership in quality and safety in healthcare, or ‘old’ and hierarchical? An interview study with strategic stakeholders. Journal of Health Service Research Policy, 18(Suppl. 2), 11–19. doi:10.1177/1355819613484460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney, S., & Gair, S. (2015). Empathy and spiritual care in midwifery practice: Contributing to women’s enhanced birth experiences. Women and Birth. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Quillinan, B., & Carolan, M. (2009). Role of clinical nurse leadership in improving patient care. Nursing Management, 16(8), 26–28. doi: 10.7748/nm2009.12.16.8.26.c7395
   Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I. (2011). Introduction: Professions and organizations – a conceptual framework. Current Sociology, 59, 389–405. doi: 10.1177/0011392111402584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, L., & Webb, C. (2006). What makes a good midwife? An integrative review of methodologically-diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(4), 414–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04026.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nursing & Midwifery Council. (2015). The code – professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, R., & Downe, S. (2009). A metasynthesis of midwives’ experience of hospital practice in publicly funded settings: Compliance, resistance and authenticity. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 13(6), 589–609. doi: 10.1177/1363459308341439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, M., & Leicester, G. (2012). Dancing at the edge, competence, culture and organization in the 21st century. Devon: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orbach, S. (2008). Work is where we live: Emotional literacy and the psychological dimensions of the various relationships there. Emotion, Space and Society, 1(1), 14–17. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2008.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., & Griffiths, R. (2007). The effect of professional socialisation on midwives’ practice. Women and Birth, 20, 31–34. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2006.09.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Byrne, G. (2013). Enhancing frontline clinical leadership in an acute hospital trust. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(17–18), 2625–2635. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayment, J. (2011). Midwives’ emotion and body work in two hospital settings: Personal strategies and professional projects (PhD thesis). Coventry: University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Rayment, J. (2015). Emotional labour: How midwives manage emotion at work. The Practising Midwife, 18, 9–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renfrew, M. J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M. H., Campbell, J., Channan, A. A., Cheung, N. F., … Declercq, E. (2014, June 23). Midwifery and quality care: Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60919-3
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldisation of society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, R. (2000). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 76–84. doi: 10.1108/01437730110382631
   Google Scholar
• Sandall, J. (2012). Every woman needs a midwife, and some women need a doctor too. Birth, 39(4), 323–326. doi: 10.1111/birt.12010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall, J., Benoit, C., Wrede, S., Murray, S. F., van Teijlingen, E. R., & Westfall, R. (2009). Social service professional or market expert? Maternity care relations under neoliberal healthcare reform. Current Sociology, 57(4), 529–553. doi: 10.1177/0011392109104353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people. Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. (2006). In command of care. Towards the theory of congruent leadership. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(2), 132–144. doi: 10.1177/1744987106059459
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. (2008). Congruent leadership: Values in action. Journal of Nursing Management, 16, 519–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00895.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D., & Sherratt, A. (2010). Lamp light on leadership: Clinical leadership and Florence Nightingale. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 115–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01051.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull James, K. (2011). Leadership in context: Lessons from new leadership theory and current leadership development practice. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs_leadership.html
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2007). Improving maternity services: Small is beautiful – lessons from a birth centre. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2010). Childbirth embodiment: Problematic aspects of current understandings. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(3), 486–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M., Armit, K., Loewanthal, L., Eckert, R., West, T., & Lee, A. (2015). Leadership and leadership development in health care: The evidence base. London: The Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management with The King’s Fund and the Center for Creative Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D. B. Jr. (1994). Leadership challenges – 2002. New Directions for Student Services, 1994, 91–99. doi: 10.1002/ss.37119946609
   Google Scholar