Embodying policy-making in mental health: the implementation of Partners in Recovery

References

• Althaus, C., Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Australian policy handbook (5th ed.). Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, W. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. doi: 10.1037/h0095655
   Google Scholar
• Banfield, M., Gardner, K., Yen, L., McRae, I., Gillespie, J., & Wells, R. (2012). Coordination of care in Australian mental health policy. Australian Health Review, 36(2), 153–157. doi: 10.1071/AH11049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendelow, G. (2000). Pain and gender. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organizational Studies, 30(6), 863–884.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, L., Hodges, C., Halloran, K., Grigg, M., & Swift, M. (2014). Impact of care coordination on Australia’s mental health service delivery system. Australian Health Review, 38, 396–400. doi: 10.1071/AH13181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunton, R. (2001). Knowledge, embodiment and neo-liberal drug policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 28, 221–243.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. (2012). NGOs called on to be ‘partners in recovery’ (Media Release). Retrieved November 5, 2012, from http://www.arafmiaustralia.asn.au/news--publications-blog/media-release-ngos-called-on-to-be-partners-in-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. (2005). Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), 14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1993). The structure of knowledge. Social Research, 60(1), 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. doi: 10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, F. (2012). Mapping the sociology of health and medicine: America, Britain and Australia compared. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2014a). Partners in recovery: Coordinated support and flexible funding for people with severe and persistent mental illness with complex needs (PIR). Retrieved November 5, 2015, from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pir
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2014b). About partners in recovery. Retrieved November 5, 2015, from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pir-about
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing. (2012a). Grant funding round: Instructions for submitting applications for partners in recovery: Engagement of PIR organisations. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing. (2012b). Partners in recovery (PIR) coordinated support and flexible funding for people with severe, persistent mental illness and complex needs initiative. Program guidelines for the engagement of PIR organisations 2012–2013 to 2015–2016. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2014). Nurturing longevity: Sociological constructions of ageing, care and the body. Health Sociology Review, 23(1), 33–42. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2014.23.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, A., & Fennell, M. (1995). Through the lenses of organizational sociology: The role of organizational theory and research in conceptualizing and examining our health care system. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 35, 154–169. doi: 10.2307/2626962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. (2010). The problem of embodiment in the sociology of knowledge: Afterword to the special issue on knowledge in practice. Qualitative Sociology, 33(4), 569–574. doi: 10.1007/s11133-010-9173-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., & Maybin, J. (2011). Documents, practices and policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7(2), 155–170. doi: 10.1332/174426411X579207
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2014a). Introduction: Knowledge in policy – Embodied, inscribed, enacted. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 1–19). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2014b). Knowledge and policy in research and practice. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 201–218). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, M. (2014). Enacting knowledge in a european project. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 123–141). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, P. (1990). The expressive body: A common ground for the sociology of emotions and health and illness. Sociology of Health and Illness, 12(4), 452–477. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheradi, S. (2011). Organizational learning: The sociology of practice. In M. Esterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Z., & Colebatch, H. (2006). Busy little workers: Policy workers own accounts. In H. Colebatch (Ed.), Beyond the policy cycle: The policy process in Australia (pp. 240–265). Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, L., Oliffe, J., Ponic, P., Kelly, M., & Bottorf, J. (2010). Unclean fathers, responsible men: Smoking, stigma and fatherhood. Health Sociology Review, 19(4), 522–533. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.4.522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., & Field, D. (1996). Medical sociology, chronic illness and the body. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(2), 241–257. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10934993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513. doi: 10.1177/0170840600213001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D., Forsyth, R., Iedema, R., & Carroll, K. (2006). The (im)possibilities of clinical democracy. Health Sociology Review, 15, 506–519. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.506
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. (2014). ‘We know who to talk to’: Embodied knowledge in England’s department of health. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 73–102). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, E. (2014). Birth control: Power/knowledge in the politics of birth. Health Sociology Review, 23(2), 254–268. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2014.11081978
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, D., & Calista D. (Eds.). (1990). Implementation and the policy process. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, N. (2010). ‘The “buck” stops with me’ – Reconciling men's lay conceptualisations of responsibility for health with men's health policy. Health Sociology Review, 19(4), 419–436. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.4.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., Hickie, I., & Mendoza, J. (2009). National mental health reform: Less talk, more action. Medical Journal of Australia, 190, 193–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J. (2012). Experiential knowledge in action: Consulting practitioners for policy change. Policy and Society, 31, 131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J. (2014). Seeing knowledge in mental health in scotland. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: Embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 21–42). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J., Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2011). Implementing recovery: An analysis of the key technologies in Scotland. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 5(1). doi:10.1186/1752-4458-5-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry, J., Gillespie, J., Hancock, N., & Yen, I. (2015). Doing mental health care integration: A qualitative study of a new work role. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9(32). doi:10.1186/s13033-015-0025-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svabo, C. (2009). Materiality in a practice-based approach. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 360–370. doi: 10.1108/09696470910974153
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (1986). Interpretive policy inquiry. Policy Sciences, 19, 307–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. (1992). Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urbis. (2015). Partners in recovery annual report 2014–2015. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, H. (1992). A national mental health policy for Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 157, 510–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, H., McKeon, G., Harris, M., Diminic, S., Siskind, D., & Scheurer, R. (2014). System-level intersectoral linkages between the mental health and non-clinical support sectors: A qualitative systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(10), 895–906. doi: 10.1177/0004867414541683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. (2011). Organised chaos: An interpretive approach to evidence-based policy making in Defra. Political Studies, 59, 959–977. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16(1), 111–121. doi: 10.1177/016224399101600108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1990). Tackling the implementation problem: Epistemological issues in implementation research. In D. Palumbo & D. Calista (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process (pp. 213–227). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1993). The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and text. Policy Sciences, 26, 41–61. doi: 10.1007/BF01006496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2003). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar