(Dis)entangling medicine and media: a qualitative analysis of the relationship between the fields of healthcare and journalism

References

• Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 673–676. doi: 10.1017/S1049096502001142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M., Laberge, S., & Hodges, B. D. (2009). Boundary-work in the health research field: Biomedical and clinician scientists’ perceptions of social science research. Minerva, 47(2), 171–194. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9120-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright, J., Hartman, D., & Widin, J. (2018). Bourdieu’s field theory and the social sciences. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, R. (1998). Field theory in comparative context: A new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society, 28(3), 463–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 679–682. doi: 10.1017/S1049096502001166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The field of cultural production: Essays on Art and literature (pp. 29–73). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L., & Hallin, D. C. (2016). Making health public: How news coverage is remaking media, medicine, and contemporary life. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britten, N. (2008). Medicines and society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, A., & Tovey, P. (2007). Therapeutic pluralism? Evidence, power and legitimacy in UK cancer services. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(4), 551–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01002.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. doi: 10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Burri, R. V. (2008). Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62. doi: 10.1177/0306312707082021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busfield, J. (2010). ‘A pill for every ill’: Explaining the expansion in medicine use. Social Science and Medicine, 70(6), 934–941. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(April), 161–194. doi: 10.2307/1519765
   Google Scholar
• Collyer, F. M. (2018). Envisaging the healthcare sector as a field: Moving from Talcott Parsons to Pierre Bourdieu. Social Theory & Health, 16(2), 111–126. doi: 10.1057/s41285-017-0046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, F. M., Willis, K. F., Franklin, M., Harley, K., & Short, S. D. (2015). Healthcare choice: Bourdieu’s capital, habitus and field. Current Sociology, 63(5), 685–699. doi: 10.1177/0011392115590082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, F. M., Willis, K. F., & Lewis, S. (2017). Gatekeepers in the healthcare sector: Knowledge and Bourdieu's concept of field. Social Science & Medicine, 186(August 2017), 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conrad, P. (2005). The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq, J. (2018). Balancing journalists’ and scientists’ professional practices. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practices, 13(1–3). [In Press].
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge, S. (2016). The digital journalist: The journalistic field, boundaries, and disquieting change. In B. Franklin & S. Eldridge (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 44–54). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(1983), 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441. doi: 10.1177/1468794111404329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers, M., & Mangez, E. (2015). Bourdieu's theory of social fields: Concepts and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (1998). The new genetics and health. Public Understanding of Science, 7(1), 41–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Collyer, F., Willis, K., Harley, K., Marcus, K., Calnan, M., & Gabe, J. (2017). Healthcare in the news media: The privileging of private over public. Journal of Sociology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1440783317733324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti, D. (2010). Quand la santé deviant médiatique. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, A., Herrett, E., Gasparrini, A., Van Staa, T., Goldacre, B., Smeeth, L., & Bhaskaran, K. (2016). Impact of statin related media coverage on use of statins: Interrupted time series analysis with UK primary care data. The British Medical Journal, 353, i3283. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, N., Shuval, J. T., & Gross, S. (2005). Boundary at work: Alternative medicine in biomedical settings. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(1), 20–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00430.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1996). An uneasy relationship: The tensions between medicine and the media. The Lancet, 347(9015), 1600–1603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91081-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira Gray, D., White, E., & Russell, G. (2016). Medicalisation in the UK: Changing dynamics, but still ongoing. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(1), 7–11. doi: 10.1177/0141076815600908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2001). Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print news media. Social Science & Medicine, 52(8), 1255–1268. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00229-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharma.be. (2016). Pharma figures 2016. Brussels: Pharma.be.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. (2001). Understanding the approaches for accommodating multiple stakeholders’ interests. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 1(3), 264–285. doi: 10.1504/IJARGE.2001.000015
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. J., Hsiao, W., Berman, P., & Reich, M. R. (2004). Getting health reform right: A guide to improving performance and equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C. (2002). Media & health. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slembrouck, S., & Hall, C. (2013). Boundary work. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, & C. Van Nijnatten (Eds.), Analysing social work communication : discourse in practice (pp. 61–78). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Viale, T. (2011). Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4), 423–442. doi: 10.1177/0011392111402586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Test-Aankoop. (2016). Genees de geneesmiddelenindustrie: teken onze petitie. Retrieved from http://www.testaankoop.be/gezondheid/geneesmiddelen/nieuws/genees-de-geneesmiddelenindustrie-tekenonze-petitie#startpetition
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2008). Field. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 67–81). Stocksfield: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bogaert, S., Ayala, R. A., & Bracke, P. (2017). Beyond ubiquity: Unravelling medicalisation within the frame of health insurance and health-policy making. Social Theory and Health, 15(4), 407–429. doi: 10.1057/s41285-017-0035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bogaert, S., Declercq, J., Christiaens, T., Jacobs, G., & Bracke, P. (2018). In the land of pharma: A qualitative analysis of the reputational discourse of the pharmaceutical industry. Public Relations Inquiry, 7(2), 127–147. doi: 10.1177/2046147X18774588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slooten, E., Friedman, D. B., & Tanner, A. (2013). Are we getting the health information we need from the mass media? An assessment of consumers' perceptions of health and medical news Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 17(1), 35–53. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2013.756338
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A., Polak, P., & Świątkiewicz-Mośny, M. (2018). Who defines-who decides? Theorising the epistemic communities, communities of practice and interest groups in the healthcare field. Social Theory & Health. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1057/s41285-018-0073-6s41285-018-0073-6
   Google Scholar
• Weitkamp, E. (2003). British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science news. Public Relations Review, 29(3), 321–333. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(03)00041-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2010), 189–221. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189
   Google Scholar