The age of LARC: making sexual citizens on the frontiers of technoscientific healthism

References

• ACOG. (2016). Committee Opinion No. 670: Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 128(2), doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. (2020). ACOG LARC Program. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Retrieved from https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2006). The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians, 7(1), 104–126. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40338719.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics. (2014). Policy statement: Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics, 134(4), e1244–e1256. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Appareddy, S., Pryor, J., & Bailey, B. (2017). Inter-pregnancy interval and adverse outcomes: Evidence for an additional risk in health disparate populations. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30(21), 2640–2644. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1260115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., McKee, C., Gandal-Powers, M., Levin, S., Kelinson, A. K., Luchowski, A., & Thompson, K. (2016). Intrauterine devices & implants: A guide to reimbursement. San Francisco. Retrieved from https://larcprogram.ucsf.edu/
   Google Scholar
• ASTHO. (2018). Guidance for Developing a Toolkit on Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Association of State and Territorial Health Official, Arlington. Retrieved from https://www.astho.org/Maternal-and-Child-Health/Increasing-Access-to-Contraception/Guidance-for-Developing-a-Toolkit-on-Immediate-Postpartum-LARC/
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. (2017). How South Carolina became a model for reproductive options. The State, Dec 4. Retrieved from https://www.thestate.com/opinion/op-ed/article187968199.html
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, K. M. (2011). Reproducing race: An ethnography of pregnancy as a site of racialization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. L., Singh, R. H., Sussman, A. L., Rogers, R. G., Pereda, B., & Espey, E. (2018). Women’s experiences with immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: A mixed-methods study. Contraception, 97(3), 219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Preventing teen pregnancy: A key role for providers. Centers for Disease Control CDC Vitalsigns. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/larc/
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2000). Maverick reproductive scientists and the production of contraceptives, 1915–2000 + . In A. R. Saetnan, N. Oudshoorn, & M. Kirejczyk (Eds.), Bodies of technology: Women's involvement with reproductive medicine. (pp. 368–383). Columbus: OSU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. Biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194. doi: 10.2307/1519765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman-Minahan, K., & Potter, J. E. (2019). Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences. Contraception, 100(6), 492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., Boydell, N., Heller, R., & Cameron, S. (2018). Community sexual health providers’ views on immediate postpartum provision of intrauterine contraception. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 44(2), 97. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388. doi: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf, C., Kimport, K., Levy, K., & Steinauer, J. (2014). A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(4), 233–240. doi: 10.1363/46e2114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, D. M., & Martin, J. (2017). What nurses need to know about immediate postpartum initiation of long-acting reversible contraception. Nursing for Women’s Health, 21(3), 186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2017.04.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein, S., & Mamo, L. (2017). The proliferation of sexual health: Diverse social problems and the legitimation of sexuality. Social Science & Medicine, 188, 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, M., & Shearin, S. (2019). Immediate postpartum contraception: Intrauterine device insertion. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 64(4), 481–487. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezer, P., Jones, T., Fisher, C., & Power, J. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of sexuality education in the Australian curriculum. Sex Education, 19(5), 551–567. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2018.1553709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronimus, A. T. (2003). Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 881–893. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00456-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, A. B., Wolf, A., & Gorby, N. (2011). Postpartum contraception: Needs vs. Reality. Contraception, 83(3), 238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthwaite, L. M., & Shaw, K. A. (2015). Immediate postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 27(6), 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., Fuentes, L., & Allina, A. (2014). Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(3), 171–175. doi: 10.1363/46e1614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., & Wapman, M. (2017). Under (implicit) pressure: Young Black and Latina women’s perceptions of contraceptive care. Contraception, 96, 221–226. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.007 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzanka, P. R., Mann, E. S., & Elliott, S. (2016). The neoliberalism wars, or notes on the persistence of neoliberalism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(4), 297–307. doi: 10.1007/s13178-016-0255-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzanka, P. R., & Schuch, E. (2020). Reproductive anxiety and conditional agency at the intersections of privilege: A focus group study of emerging adults’ perception of long-acting reversible contraception. Journal of Social Issues. Advance Online Publication, doi: 10.1111/josi.12363
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., Mann, E. S., Borrero, S., Dehlendorf, C., Fields, J., Geronimus, A. T., … Sisson, G. (2016). Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Public Health, 106(1), 18–19. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, K. D., Loper, A. C., Louison, L. M., Morse, J. E., & Hill, N. (2019). Stage-based implementation of immediate postpartum long acting reversible contraception using a reproductive justice framework. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein, E. C., Billings, D., Mattison-Faye, A., & Giese, B. Z. (2016). The South Carolina Postpartum LARC Toolkit. Choose Well Initiative and the South Carolina Birth Outcomes Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.choosewellsc.org/img/SC_Postpartum_LARC_Toolkit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A. (2014). Celebration meets caution: LARC’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception, 89(4), 237–241. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A., Ryder, K., Skarda, G., Koepsel, E., & Bennett, E. A. (2015). The sexual acceptability of intrauterine contraception: A qualitative study of young adult women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47(3), 115–122. doi: 10.1363/47e4515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofler, L. G., Cordes, S., Cwiak, C. A., Goedken, P., Jamieson, D. J., & Kottke, M. (2017). Implementing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 129(1), 3–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isley, M. M., Brown, M., Rivlin, K., Keder, L. M., & Norris, A. (2019). Why do you want it out?: Provider perspectives on early LARC removal. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133, 204S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, M. L., & Jerman, J. (2018). Contraceptive method use in the United States: Trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception, 97(1), 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017a). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology. Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1037/qup0000082
   Google Scholar
• Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., Omvig, K. J., Secura, G. M., & Peipert, J. F. (2013). Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception, 88(2), 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, E. S. (2018). Sexual citizenship and everyday feelings. In S. Talburt (Ed.), Youth Sexualities: Public Feelings and contemporary cultural Politics ( 1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 183–206). Santa Barbara: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, E. S., & Grzanka, P. R. (2018). Agency-without-choice: The visual rhetorics of long-acting reversible contraception promotion. Symbolic Interaction, 41(3), 334–356. doi: 10.1002/symb.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, E. S., White, A. L., Rogers, P. L., & Gomez, A. M. (2019). Patients’ experiences with South Carolina’s immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy. Contraception, 100(2), 165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholas, C., Madden, T., Secura, G., & Peipert, J. F. (2014). The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: What we did and what we learned. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 57(4), 645–653. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzl, J., & Kirkland, A. R. (eds.). (2010). Against health: How health became the new morality. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moniz, M. H., Chang, T., Davis, M. M., Forman, J., Landgraf, J., & Dalton, V. K. (2016). Medicaid administrator experiences with the implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Women’s Health Issues, 26(3), 313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Women’s Health Network and SisterSong. (2016). Joint statement of principles on LARC. National Women's Health Network. Retrieved from https://www.nwhn.org/nwhn-joins-statement-principles-larcs/
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Health Authority. (2016). Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC): Coverage guidance: Timing of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Placement. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-HERC/EvidenceBasedReports/LARC-CG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., Bayer, C., Braun, E., Mullen, M., Frisse, A., & Robbins, C. C. (2018). Immediate postpartum LARC reimbursement increases uptake of effective contraception after pregnancy [22G]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131, https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2018/05001/Immediate_Postpartum_LARC_Reimbursement_Increases.279.aspx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert, J. F., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120(6), 1291–1297. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri, J. (2016). Sexual states: Governance and the struggle over the antisodomy law in India. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, S., Klingler, G., & Schwalberg, R. (2014). Game change in Colorado: Widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(3), 125–132. doi: 10.1363/46e1714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. E. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. I., Evans, M., & Espey, E. (2014). Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: Increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception, 90(5), 468–471. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. J., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2010). The contraceptive CHOICE Project: Reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(2), 115.e1–115.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonfield, A., & Kost, K. (2015). Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy-related care: National and state estimates for 2010. New York: Guttmacher Institute. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/public-costs-of-UP-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Steenland, M. W., Pace, L. E., Sinaiko, A. D., & Cohen, J. L. (2019). Association between South Carolina Medicaid’s change in payment for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and birth intervals association between changes in Medicaid payment and immediate postpartum LARC use and birth intervals in South Carolina. JAMA, 322(1), 76–78. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.6854
   Google Scholar
• Sznajder, K., Carvajal, D. N., & Sufrin, C. (2020). Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study. Contraception, 101(1), 21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita, C. (2011). Global biopolitics of the IUD: How science constructs contraceptive users and women’s bodies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavernise, S. (2016). Medicaid finds opportune time to offer birth control: Right after birth. New York Times (Oct 28). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/health/birth-control-medicaid.html
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., & Karpilow, Q. C. (2018). Long-acting reversible contraception: A silver bullet solution for unintended pregnancy? American Journal of Public Health, 108(8), 1007–1008. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, D. K., Leeman, L., Sanders, J. N., Thaxton, L., Eggebroten, J. L., Yonke, N., … Espey, E. (2017). Immediate postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding outcomes: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(6), 665.e1–665.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, C. P., Whiteman, M. K., Zapata, L. B., Curtis, K. M., Hillis, S. D., & Marchbanks, P. A. (2012). Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 119(4), 762–771. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824aca39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vela, V. X., Patton, E. W., Sanghavi, D., Wood, S. F., Shin, P., & Rosenbaum, S. (2018). Rethinking Medicaid coverage and payment policy to promote high value care: The case of long-acting reversible contraception. Women’s Health Issues, 28(2), 137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggoner, M. R. (2017). The zero trimester: Pre-pregnancy care and the politics of reproductive risk. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J., Gifford, K., Ranji, U., Salganicoff, A., & Gomez, I. (2016). Medicaid Coverage of Family Planning Benefits. Kaiser Family Foundation, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://files.kff.org/attachment/Report-Medicaid-Coverage-of-Family-Planning-Benefits-Results-from-a-State-Survey
   Google Scholar
• Washington, C. I., Jamshidi, R., Thung, S. F., Nayeri, U. A., Caughey, A. B., & Werner, E. F. (2015). Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 103(1), 131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, B., Ascha, M., Verbus, E., Montague, M., Morris, J., Mercer, B., & Arora, K. S. (2019). Medicaid and receipt of interval postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception, 99(1), 32–35. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.08.017 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, D. J., & McLaughlin, A. R. (2019). Soft sterilization: Long-acting reversible contraceptives and the carceral state. Affilia. doi: 10.1177/0886109919882320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, I., Seifert, S., Hendricks, D., Jamshidi, R. M., Burke, A. E., & Fox, M. C. (2015). Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices. Contraception, 92(6), 532–535. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2012). From evidence to policy: Expanding access to family planning: Strategies to increase use of long-acting and permanent contraception. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.astho.org/Maternal-and-Child-Health/Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception/Policy-Brief-Increasing-LARC-Use-WHO/
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J., Lyons, D., Fan, Z. J., Glenn, A., & Felver, B. (2019). Improving Women's Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Role of Medicaid Reimbursement Policy Change. Washington State Health Care Authority and Department of Social and Health Services Research and Data Analysis Division, Olympia, WA. Retrieved from https://www.dshs.wa.gov/ffa/rda/research-reports/improving-women%E2%80%99s-access-long-acting-reversible-contraception-role-medicaid-reimbursement-policy-change
   Google Scholar