Data-driven intimacy: emerging technologies in the (re)making of sexual subjects and ‘healthy’ sexuality

References

• Albury, K., Burgess, J., Light, B., Race, K., & Wilken, R. (2017). Data cultures of mobile dating and hookup apps: Emerging issues for critical social science research. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2053951717720950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, S., McDonald, K., & Kirkman, M. (2019). What does ‘pornography’ mean in the digital age? Revisiting a definition for social science researchers. Porn Studies, 6(2), 144–168.
   Google Scholar
• Atanasoski, N., & Vora, K. (2019). Surrogate humanity: Race, robots, and the politics of technological futures. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2011, May). ‘Pleasure is your birthright’: Digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI. In G. Fitzpatrick et al. (Ed.), CHI ‘11 proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 257–266). ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547–566. doi: 10.1086/448884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. (2003). Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16(2), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
   Google Scholar
• Cacchioni, T. (2015). Big pharma, women and the labour of love. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E., & Carlson, M. (2002). Panopticon.com: Online surveillance and the commodification of privacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(4), 586–606. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4604_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, A. (2017). Sex toy company admits to recording users’ remote sex sessions, calls it a ‘minor bug’ [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/10/16634442/lovense-sex-toy-spy-surveillance.
   Google Scholar
• Das, A. (2014). The dildo as a political transformative tool: Feminist and queer perspectives. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 688–703. doi: 10.1007/s12119-013-9205-2
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, B. (2012). Digital qualitative methods. Volume 3: Data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (Eds.). (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 48–70). Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duller, N., & Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (2019). Sex machines as mediatized sexualities: Ethical and social implications. In T. Eberwein, M. Karmasin, F. Krotz, & M. Rath (Eds.), Responsibility and resistance: Ethics in mediatized worlds (pp. 221–239). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Faustino, M. J. (2018). Rebooting an old script by new means: Teledildonics–the technological return to the ‘coital imperative’. Sexuality & Culture, 22, 243–257. doi: 10.1007/s12119-017-9463-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feel Technology. (2018). Privacy [webpage]. Retrieved from https://feeltechnology.com/privacy.php.
   Google Scholar
• Flore, J. (2018). Pharmaceutical intimacy: Managing female sexuality through Addyi. Sexualities, 21(4), 569–586. doi: 10.1177/1363460717731933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect and anti-humanism. The Sociological Review, 61, 769–789. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Bale, C. (2018). Bodies, pornography and the circumscription of sexuality: A new materialist study of young people’s sexual practices. Sexualities, 21(3), 393–409. doi: 10.1177/1363460717699769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (2015). Sexercising to orgasm: Embodied pedagogy and sexual labour in women’s magazines. Sexualities, 18(3), 310–328. doi: 10.1177/1363460714550912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, K. (2011). ‘Screw health’: Representations of sex as a health-promoting activity in medical and popular literature. Journal of Medical Humanities, 32, 127–140. doi: 10.1007/s10912-010-9129-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta, K., & Cacchioni, T. (2013). Sexual improvement as if your health depends on it: An analysis of contemporary sex manuals. Feminism & Psychology, 23(4), 442–458. doi: 10.1177/0959353513498070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2015). Sex work in a digital era. Sociology Compass, 9(7), 558–570. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020a). For couples [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/collections/for-couples#product-details.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020b). KIIROO® Onyx+™ Interactive Male Masturbator [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/products/onyx-plus.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020c). KIIROO® Pearl2™ G-Spot Vibrator [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/products/pearl2.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020d). KIIROO® Our Story [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/pages/about.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020e). KIIROO® Articles [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/search?q=health.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiroo. (2020f). KIIROO® Welcome to our press kit! [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.kiiroo.com/a/press-kit.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, N. (2017). Teledildonics and new ways of ‘being in touch’: A phenomenological analysis of the use of haptic devices for intimate relations. Science Engineering Ethics, 23, 801–823. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9827-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovense. (2020a). Privacy [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.lovense.com/faq/Privacy.
   Google Scholar
• Lovense. (2020b). Sex tech for every bedroom: Use teledildonics to improve your sex life! [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.lovense.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Lovense. (2020c). Max2: Revolutionizing male masturbators [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.lovense.com/male-masturbators.
   Google Scholar
• Lovense. (2020d). Nora: The original Bluetooth vibrator [webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.lovense.com/rabbit-vibrator.
   Google Scholar
• Lovense. (2020e). Our long-distance sex toys are the best way to stay intimate! [webpage] Retrieved from https://www.lovense.com/long-distance-sex-toys.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016). Digital health technologies and digital data: New ways of monitoring, measuring and commodifying human bodies. In F. X. Olleros, & M. Zhegu (Eds.), Research handbook in digital transformations (pp. 85–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., & Siu, L. (Eds.). (2007). Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, P. G. (2017). Hell yes!!!!! Playing away, teledildonics and the future of sex. In P. G. Nixon, & I. Düsterhöft (Eds.), Sex in the digital age (pp. 201–212). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2018). Capitalism on ageing anxieties: Promissory discourses and the creation of an ‘anti-ageing treatment’ market. Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 191–202. doi: 10.1177/1440783318766165
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., & Krisjansen, I. (2015). Assembling ‘the bioeconomy’: Exploiting the power of the promissory life sciences. Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 28–46. doi: 10.1177/1440783314562314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, K. (2018). Towards a pragmatics of sexual media/networking devices. Sexualities, 21(8), 1325–1330. doi: 10.1177/1363460718781538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2017a). Pin-balling and boners: The posthuman phallus and intra-activist sexuality assemblages in secondary school. In L. Allen, & M. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sexuality education (pp. 631–635). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2017b). Selfies, relfies and phallic tagging: Posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1066–1079. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1185686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2017). Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 84–97. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2016.1211486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In G. S. Rubin (Ed.), Deviations: A Gayle Rubin reader (pp. 137–181). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. J. D. (2016). Surveillance, data and embodiment: On the work of being watched. Body & Society, 22(2), 108–139. doi: 10.1177/1357034X15623622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Barnao, C., & Collie, N. (2018). The droning of intimacy: Bodies, data, and sensory devices. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 32(6), 733–744. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2018.1525922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, M., Tillotson, K., Kao, R., Calderon, A., Murillo, A., Camargo, J., … Rueda, S. (2017, November). Sexual intimacy in the age of smart devices: Are we practicing safe IoT? In T. Benson, & S. Sundaresan (Eds.), IoTS&P’17 Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Internet of Things Security and Privacy (pp. 25–30). ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security.
   Google Scholar