2,032
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Domestic violence, coercive control and mental health in a pandemic: disenthralling the ecology of the domestic

& ORCID Icon
Pages 260-274 | Received 01 Feb 2021, Accepted 27 Sep 2021, Published online: 19 Oct 2021

References

  • Aisyah, S., & Parker, L. (2014). Problematic conjugations: Women’s agency, marriage and domestic violence in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 38(2), 205–223.
  • Anderson, K. L. (2010). Conflict, power, and violence in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 726–742.
  • Barlow, C., & Walklate, S. (2021). Gender, risk assessment and coercive control: Contradictions in terms? The British Journal of Criminology, 61, 887–904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa104
  • Becker, H. S. (2014). What about Mozart? What about murder?. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 29(86), 5–13.
  • Boxall, H., Morgan, A. & Brown, R. (2020). The prevalence of domestic violence among women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical Bulletin no. 28. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/sb/sb28
  • Boyden, P., Betton, V., Sneddon, W., Elliott, M., & Martin, D. (2020). Increase in animal abuse likely during lockdown. The Veterinary Record, 186(14), 457.
  • Brauer, J. R., Tittle, C. R., & Antonaccio, O. (2019). The costs of coercive control: Assessing behavioral and mental health correlates of erratic and oppressive coercion. Justice Quarterly, 36(2), 255–286.
  • Cohn, S., & Lynch, R. (2017). Posthuman perspectives: Relevance for a global public health. Critical Public Health, 27(3), 285–292.
  • Crossman, K. A., Hardesty, J. L., & Raffaelli, M. (2016). “He could scare me without laying a hand on me” Mothers’ experiences of nonviolent coercive control during marriage and after separation. Violence Against Women, 22(4), 454–473.
  • Dragiewicz, M. (2009). Why sex and gender matter in domestic violence research and advocacy. In E. Stark, & E. Buzawa (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationships: Vol. 3: Criminal justice and the law (pp. 201–215). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625.
  • Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Woodlock, D., Salter, M., Easton, H., Lynch, A., Campbell, H., Leach, J. & Milne, L., (2019). Domestic violence and communication technology: Survivor experiences of intrusion, surveillance, and identity crime. Sydney: Australian Communications Consumer Action Network & Queensland University of Technology.
  • Elizabeth, V. (2015). From domestic violence to coercive control: Towards the recognition of oppressive intimacy in the family court. New Zealand Sociology, 30(2), 26.
  • Faircloth, C., Iqbal, H., & Twamley, K. (2021). ‘Er, not the best time’: The challenges of researching family life during a pandemic-transforming society. Transforming Society. Bristol University Press & Policy Press. Retrieved from https://www.transformingsociety.co.uk/2021/01/13/er-not-the-best-time-the-challenges-of-researching-family-life-during-a-pandemic/
  • Fitzgerald, A. J., Barrett, B. J., Stevenson, R., & Cheung, C. H. (2019). Animal maltreatment in the context of intimate partner violence: A manifestation of power and control?. Violence Against Women, 25(15), 1806–1828.
  • Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Meyer, S. (2020). Coronavirus: Fear of family violence spike as COVID-19 impact hits households. Monash Lens. Retrieved from https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2020/03/18/1379841/coronavirus-fear-of-family-violence-spikeas-covid-19-impact-hits-households
  • Friese, C., & Nuyts, N. (2017). Posthumanist critique and human health: How nonhumans (could) figure in public health research. Critical Public Health, 27(3), 303–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1294246
  • Graca, S. (2017). Domestic violence policy and legislation in the UK: A discussion of immigrant women’s vulnerabilities. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22, 1.
  • Halberstam, J. (2012). Gaga feminism: Sex, gender, and the end of normal. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Hardesty, J. L., Khaw, L., Ridgway, M. D., Weber, C., & Miles, T. (2013). Coercive control and abused women’s decisions about their pets when seeking shelter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2617–2639.
  • Harley, K., & Willis, K. (2020). Living with motor neurone disease: An insider’s sociological perspective. Health Sociology Review, 29, 211–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1789487
  • Hill, J. (2019). See what you made me do: Power, control and domestic abuse. Carlton, Victoria: Black Inc.
  • Hollingshead, D. (2020). Women, insects, modernity: American domestic ecologies in the late nineteenth century. Feminist Modernist Studies, 3(2), 180–204.
  • Hörl, E. (2017). Introduction to general ecology: The ecologization of thinking (N. F. Schott, Trans.). In E. Hörl, & J. Burton (Eds.), General ecology: The new ecological paradigm (pp. 1–74). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Hörl, E. (2018). General ecology. In R. Braidotti, & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 172–175). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Knox, S., & Burkard, A. W. (2009). Qualitative research interviews. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 566–575.
  • Kristeva, J. (1985). Stabat mater. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader: Julia Kristeva (pp. 160–186). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Law, J., Afdal, G., Asdal, K., Lin, W. Y., Moser, I., & Singleton, V. (2014). Modes of syncretism: Notes on noncoherence. Common Knowledge, 20(1), 172–192.
  • Lupton, D. (2019). Toward a more-than-human analysis of digital health: Inspirations from feminist new materialism. Qualitative Health Research, 29(14), 1998–2009.
  • Maher, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K., Meyer, S., Roberts, S., & Pfitzner, N. (2020). Mothering through and in violence: Discourses of the ‘good mother’. Sociology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520967262
  • McCallum, T. (2018) (M)other love: Cultural difference and gendered practices in Queensland, Australia (Doctoral thesis). University of Newcastle, Nova dissertations and Theses Global.
  • McMahon, M., & McGorrery, P. (2016). Criminalising controlling and coercive behaviour: The next step in the prosecution of family violence? Alternative Law Journal, 41(2), 98–101.
  • Meyer, S., & Frost, A. (2019). Domestic and family violence: A critical introduction to knowledge and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Morgan, L., Protopopova, A., Birkler, R. I. D., Itin-Shwartz, B., Sutton, G. A., Gamliel, A., Raz, T. (2020). Human–dog relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Booming dog adoption during social isolation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00649-x
  • Morison, T., & Macleod, C. (2014). When veiled silences speak: Reflexivity, trouble and repair as methodological tools for interpreting the unspoken discourse-based data. Qualitative Research, 14, 694–711.
  • Newberry, M. (2017). Pets in danger: Exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 273–281.
  • Pfitzner, N., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & True, J. (2020). Responding to the ‘Shadow Pandemic’: Practitioner views on the nature of and responses to violence against women in Victoria, Australia during the COVID-19 restrictions. doi:https://doi.org/10.26180/5ed9d5198497c
  • Postmus, J. L., Plummer, S.-B., McMahon, S., Murshid, N. S., & Sung Kim, M. (2011). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511421669
  • Rathus, Z. (2013). Shifting language and meanings between social science and the law: Defining family violence. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36(2), 359–389.
  • Rathus, Z., Rose, J., Tsantefski, M., & McCallum, T. (2021). Submission to women’s safety and justice taskforce options for legislating against coercive control and the creation of a standalone domestic violence offence. Discussion Paper 1. July, 2021. https://www.womenstaskforce.qld.gov.au
  • Rock, M. J., Degeling, C., & Blue, G. (2014). Toward stronger theory in critical public health: Insights from debates surrounding posthumanism. Critical Public Health, 24(3), 337–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.827325
  • Rose, J. (2017). “Never enough hours in the day”: Employed mothers’ perceptions of time pressure. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(2), 116–130.
  • Rose, J., Brady, M., Yerkes, M. A., & Coles, L. (2015). “Sometimes they just want to cry for their mum”: Couples’ negotiations and rationalisations of gendered divisions in infant care. Journal of Family Studies, 21(1), 38–56.
  • Sabino, E. C., Buss, L. F., Carvalho, M. P. S., Prete, C. A., Crispim, M. A. E., & Fraiji, N. A. (2021). Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite high seroprevalence. The Lancet, 397, 452–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/SO140-6736(21)00183-5
  • Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland, & Bryce, Q. (2015). Not now, not ever: Putting an end to domestic and family violence in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stark, E. & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104.
  • Tomlinson, J. (2019). Domestic violence is a major public health issue. Australian Medicine, 31(14), 14.
  • UN Women. (2020). Violence against women and girls: the shadow pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/4/statement-ed-phumzile-violence-against-women-during-pandemic.
  • Walklate, S., & Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2019). The criminalisation of coercive control: The power of law? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(4), 94.
  • Walklate, S., Maher, J., McCulloch, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Beavis, K. (2019). Victim stories and victim policy: Is there a case for a narrative victimology? Crime, Media, Culture, 15(2), 199–215.
  • Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. New York: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.