The effects of developing-countries’ innovation support programs: evidence from Ecuador

References

• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2008). On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica, 76, 1537–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afuah, A. (2002). Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 171–179.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. (2004). Sources of export success in small-and medium-sized enterprises: The impact of public programs. International Business Review, 13, 383–400.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking at national systems of innovation from the South. Industry and Innovation, 7, 55–75.10.1080/713670247
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2002). Innovation systems and developing countries ( No. 02-05). DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B. (2009). The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success–Do subsidy history and size matter? ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (09-032).
   Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R & D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 7, 1133–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., & Ulph, D. (1988). R&D rivalry vs R&D cooperation under uncertainty. Recherches Economiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 54, 373–384.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. Trade, technology and international competitiveness, 22, 69–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bérubé, C., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 42, 206–225.10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakney, M. (1987). Transfer of technology and developing nations. Fordham Int’l LJ, 11, 689–723.
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., & Graf, H. (2012). Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: A comparison of 10 technologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, 345–372.10.1080/10438599.2011.582704
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., Schimke, A., & Brenner, T. (2011). The effects of cooperative R&D subsidies and subsidized cooperation on employment growth (No. 34). Working paper series in economics.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72.10.1111/joes.2008.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., & Kösters, S. (2012). Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups. Small Business Economics, 39, 921–936.10.1007/s11187-011-9340-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., & Kösters, S. (2015). Public R&D support for newly founded firms–effects on patent activity and employment growth. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 16, 7–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., Lundvall, B. Å., Vang, J., & Joseph, K. J. (2009). Designing innovation policies for development: Towards a systemic experimentation-based approach. In: B. Å. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, & J. Vang (Eds.), (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting (pp. 360–379). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., Lundvall, B. Å., Vang, J., & Joseph, K. J. (2010). Innovation policies for development: Towards a systemic experimentation based approach. Papers in Innovation Studies 2010/1, Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2008). Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy, 37, 1684–1696.10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). Institutions and policies in developing economies. In B. Å. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, & J. Vang (Eds.), (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting (pp. 337–359). Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. H. (2009). Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 239–253.10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 9, 569–596.10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, J., & Storey, D. J. (2002). Small business policy in the United Kingdom: The inheritance of the Small Business Service and implications for its future effectiveness. Environment and Planning C, 20, 163–177.10.1068/c0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industrial research versus development investment: The implications of financial constraints. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 527–544.10.1093/cje/beq038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497–529.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, R., & Veugelers, R. (1991). Strategic investment with spillovers. European Journal of Political Economy, 7, 345–366.10.1016/0176-2680(91)90018-X
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. M. (1999). Does federal funding “crowd in” private funding of science? Contemporary Economic Policy, 17, 423–431.10.1111/coep.1999.17.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, K., & Fang, F. (2008, December). Management of R&D within a Dynamic Standardization Environment. In The 5th International Conference of Innovation & Management, The Netherlands (pp. 623–629).
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47, 117–132.10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, R., & Teubal, M. (1997). Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 342–370). London: Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Gomel, M. M., & Sbragia, R. (2006). A Capacitação Tecnológica e o Desempenho Exportador da Indústria Brasileira de Software: O Papel dos Investimentos em P&D [The technological capability and exporter performance of the Brazilian software industry: The role of R & D investments]. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1, 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, H. & Strobl, E. (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74, 215–234.10.1111/ecca.2007.74.issue-294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerzoni, M., & Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs. Supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, 44, 726–747.10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. (2005). Innovation and Diffusion. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.10.2307/2971733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–294.10.1111/roes.1998.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, L., & Martínez, A. (2009). La I+ D pública complementa o sustituye la I+ D privada? Un análisis de la insdustria manufacturera española. Paper presented to the. In XIX National Conference of ACEDE.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, R. S., & Link, A. N. (1981). Federal support of technological growth in industry: Some evidence of crowding out. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 4, 86–88.10.1109/TEM.1981.6447450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, K., Imbens, G., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71, 1161–1189.10.1111/ecta.2003.71.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2014). National or international public funding? Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the innovation impact of R&D support programmes. MPRA Paper 54218. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/54218/
   Google Scholar
• Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two‐step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 729–747.10.1002/jae.v23:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEC. (2013). Encuesta Nacional de Innovación 2013: metodología del diseño muestral. Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos.
   Google Scholar
• INEC & SENESCYT. (2011). Principales indicadores de ciencia, tecnología e innovación, periodo 2009-2011. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Ecuador. Retrieved from http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Estadisticas_Economicas/Ciencia_Tecnologia/Presentacion_de_principales_resultados_ACTI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intarakumnerd, P., & Chaminade, C. (2011). Innovation policies in Thailand: Towards a system of innovation approach? Asia Pacific Business Review, 17, 241–256.10.1080/13602381.2011.533504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., Muller, E., & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. The American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L. (1986). An analysis of cooperative research and development. The RAND Journal of Economics, 17, 527–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752–782.10.1257/0022051042177685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga, T. (2005). R&D subsidy and self-financed R&D: The case of Japanese high-technology start-ups. Small Business Economics, 24, 53–62.10.1007/s11187-005-3096-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20, 165–186.10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bas, C., & Sierra, C. (2002). ‘Location versus home country advantages’ in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy, 31(4), 589–609.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00128-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, D., & Neary, J. P. (1997). Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. The American Economic Review, 87, 642–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N. (1982). An analysis of the composition of R&D spending. Southern Economic Journal, 49, 342–349.10.2307/1058486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Innovation system research and policy. Where it came from and where it might go. Oslo: Center for Advances Studies – Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, M. (1992). Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 643–661.10.1016/0167-7187(92)90064-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306.10.1086/258177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Statistical Office of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Özçelik, E., & Taymaz, E. (2008). R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience. Research Policy, 37, 258–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P., & Vega, M. (1999). Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: Location vs. Home country advantages. Research Policy, 28, 145–155.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00117-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, C. (1986). Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Piga, C. A., & Vivarelli, M. (2004). Internal and external R&D: A sample selection approach*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66, 457–482.10.1111/obes.2004.66.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva, M. (2004). The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in developing countries: A survey of theoretical models and empirical studies. SSRN Electronic Journal SSRN Journal. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=907473
   Google Scholar
• Radicic, D., Pugh, G. T., Hollanders, H., & Wintjes, R. (2014). The impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven EU regions. UNU-MERIT Working Paper, (2014-033).
   Google Scholar
• Robson, M. (1993). Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research. Southern Economic Journal, 60, 63–71.10.2307/1059931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B., & Thomas, N. (1996). Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 249–264.10.2307/2533160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, H., Bessant, J., & Hobday, M. (2007). Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: Developing a policy tool. R&D Management, 37, 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SENPLADES. (2012). Transformación de la matriz productiva a través del conocimiento y el talento humano [Transformation of the productive matrix through knowledge and human talent]. Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2005). Measuring innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 148–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K. (1992). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 82, 1307–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viotti, E. B. (2002). National learning systems: A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 653–680.10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00167-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivarelli, M. (2014). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues, 48, 123–154.10.2753/JEI0021-3624480106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonortas, N. S. (1994). Inter-firm cooperation with imperfectly appropriable research. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 413–435.10.1016/0167-7187(94)90041-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82–100.10.2307/2601030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, L., Kim, L., & Dahlman, C. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea’s acquisition of technological capability. In N. Rosenberg & C. Frischtak (Eds.), International technology transfer (pp. 167–221). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, G. B., & Reinthaler, V. (2008). The effectiveness of subsidies revisited: Accounting for wage and employment effects in business R&D. Research Policy, 37, 1403–1412.10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawislak, P. A., Cherubini Alves, A., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7, 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 547–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J. I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28, 36–67.10.1111/joes.2014.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar