The role of cross-functional integration in new product development: differences between incremental and radical innovation projects

References

• Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 21–47. 10.1111/ijmr.2006.8.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 3–23. 10.1111/jpim.2009.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., Stamm, B. V., Moeslin, K. M., & Neyer, A. (2010). Backing outsiders: Selection strategies for discontinuos inovation. R&D Management, 40, 345–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., Öberg, C., & Trifilova, A. (2014). Framing problems in radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 1284–1292. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, A., & Voigt, K. I. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management-Insights from the German software industry. Technovation, 29, 351–367. 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel, M., Heinemann, F., Engelen, A., & Neubauer, S. (2011). Cross-Functional integration of R&D, marketing, and manufacturing in radical and incremental product innovations and its effects on project effectiveness and efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 251–269. 10.1111/jpim.2011.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T.E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, G. (1997). Communication and co-operation in product development: A case study of the European car producer. R&D Management, 27, 239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantone, R., & Rubera, G. (2012). When should RD&E and marketing collaborate? The moderating role of exploration-exploitation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 144–157. 10.1111/jpim.2011.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Waldman, D.A. (2010). Leadership, behavioral context, and the performance of work groups in a knowledge-intensive setting. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 384–400. 10.1007/s10961-009-9125-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Veugelers, R. (2015). Going radical: Producing and transferring disruptive innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 663–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (2007). Managing technology development projects. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 35, 67–67. 10.1109/EMR.2007.329141
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers, M., Guenter, H., & Hussinger, K. (2011). Costs and benefits of inter-departmental innovation collaboration. Research Policy, 40, 565–575. 10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, P., Eskerod, P., Dalcher, D., & Sandhawalia, B. (2010). The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Project Management Journal, 41, 59–78. 10.1002/pmj.20194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. California: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452229249
   Google Scholar
• Drejer, A. (2002). Situations for innovation management: Towards a contingency model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 4–17. 10.1108/14601060210415135
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A.E., Keller, S. B., & Hansen, J. D. (2006). Bridging the divide between logistics and marketing: Facilitating collaborative behavior. Journal of Business Logistics, 27, 1–27. 10.1002/jbl.2006.27.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, A., Brettel, M., & Wiest, G. (2012). Cross-functional integration and new product performance — The impact of national and corporate culture. Journal of International Management, 18, 52–65. 10.1016/j.intman.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., Groemminger, A., & Heil, S. (2017). Managing technological distance in internal and external collaborations: Absorptive capacity routines and social integration for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A.G., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Oliveira, L. S. (2016). The effect of innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies. Research Policy, 45, 577–592. 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, N., Sanzo, M. J., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2008). New product internal performance and market performance: Evidence from Spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type. Technovation, 28, 713–725. 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, T.C., Buisson, D. H., & Yap, C. M. (2006). National culture and R&D and marketing integration mechanisms in new product development: A cross-cultural study between Singapore and New Zealand. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 293–307. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 710–737. 10.1177/1094428109351319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, J.F., Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Pearson, A. W., & Cunha, M. P. (2003). Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development. Technovation, 23, 185–191. 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00107-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215. 10.1111/jpim.1996.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., Price, R. L., Vojak, B. A., & Hoffman, N. (2014). Serial innovators’ processes: How they overcome barriers to creating radical innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 1362–1371. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanisch, B., & Wald, A. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research. Project Management Journal, 43, 4–23. 10.1002/pmj.v43.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holahan, P. J., Sullivan, Z. Z., & Markham, S. K. (2014). Product development as core competence: How formal product development practices differ for radical, more innovative, and incremental product innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 329–345. 10.1111/jpim.2014.31.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y. C., Chen, C. J., Lin, B. W., & Kuo, C. (2016). Resource alignment, organizational distance, and knowledge transfer performance: The contingency role of alliance form. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE. (2013). PINTEC - technological national survey. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013 (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Jugend, D., Silva, S. L., Oprime, P. C., & Pimenta, M. L. (2015). Organizational issues for integration of high-technology in new product development: Framework proposal and case studies in Brazilian companies. Innovation: Organization & Management, 17, 217–231. 10.1080/14479338.2015.1013428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B. (1996). Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 137–151. 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00110-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B. (2001). Market orientation, interdepartmental integration, and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 314–323.10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00101-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B., & McDonough, E. F. (2003). An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 161–178. 10.1111/1540-5885.1430161
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B., & Mentzer, J. T. (1998). Marketing’s integration with other departments. Journal of Business Research, 42, 53–62. 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00068-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K.B., Barczak, G., & Moss, R. (2006). Dialogue on best practices in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 106–116. 10.1111/jpim.2006.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K.B., Barczak, G., Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., & Perks, H. (2012). An examination of new product development best practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 180–192. 10.1111/jpim.2011.29.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D., & Lee, H. (2010). Managing innovation champions: The impact of project characteristics on direct manager role. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 1007–1019. 10.1111/jpim.2010.27.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Min, B., & Cha, J. (1999). The roles of R&D team leaders in Korea: A contingent approach. R&D Management, 29, 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, A., Heising, W., & Gemünden, H. G. (2016). A contingency approach on the impact of front-end success on project portfolio success. Project Management Journal, 47, 115–129. 10.1002/pmj.2016.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
   Google Scholar
• Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Wierenga, B. (2002). The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 305–317. 10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00147-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2009). Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams. Technovation, 29, 192–203. 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, P., O’Toole, T., & Biemans, W. (2016). Measuring involvement of a network of customers in NPD. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 166–180. 10.1111/jpim.12293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltz, E., Souder, W. E., & Kumar, A. (2001). Influencing R&D/marketing integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: Intended and unintended effects of managerial actions. Journal of Business Research, 52, 69–82. 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsen, K., & Eng, T. (2016). The antecedents of cross-functional coordination and their implications for marketing adaptiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5946–5955. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E., Walker, O. C., Jr, Ruekerf, R. W., & Bonnerd, J. M. (2001). Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 258–271. 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00091-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks, H., Kahn, K. B., & Zhang, C. (2009). An empirical evaluation of R&D-marketing NPD integration in chinese firms: The Guanxi effect. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 640–651. 10.1111/jpim.2009.26.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud, A. (2004). A model of new products success and accelerated learning in collaborative new product teams. Innovation: Organization & Management, 6, 199–219. 10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.199
   Google Scholar
• Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. (2001). T Plan: Fast start to technology roadmapping. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. B., Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science, 39, 1281–1297. 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rubera, G., Ordanini, A., & Calantone, R. (2012). Whether to integrate R&D and marketing: The effect of firm competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 766–783. 10.1111/jpim.2012.29.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhar, A.J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47, 394–414. 10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S. F., Mohr, J. J., & Sengupta, S. (2014). Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 552–566. 10.1111/jpim.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souder, W. E., Sherman, D., & Davies-Cooper, R. (1998). Environmental uncertainty, organizational, integration, and new product development effectiveness: A test of contingency theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 520–533. 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, R.M., Totzauer, F., & Zacharias, N. A. (2013). A closer look at cross-functional R&D cooperation for innovativeness: Innovation-oriented leadership and human resource practices as driving forces. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 924–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T. P., Fu, X., & Xie, Q. (2017). Influence of functional conflicts on marketing capability in channel relationships. Journal of Business Research, 78, 252–260. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, L., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2010). Towards an integrated framework for managing the process of innovation. R&D Management, 40, 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teller, J., Unger, B. N., Kock, A., & Gemmünden, H.G. (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 596–607. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K.-H., & Hsu, T. T. (2013). Cross-Functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. Oxford: University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Veryzer, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 304–321. 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00105-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. (2017). Gross domestic product ranking table. Retrived July 3, 2017 from https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-ranking-table.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methodos. (3). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., Guo, Z., & Fang, E. (2014). An examination of how and when the top management team matters for firm innovativeness: The effects of TMT functional backgrounds. Innovation: Organization & Management, 16, 323–342. 10.1080/14479338.2014.11081991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar