The influence of decision comprehensiveness on innovative behaviors in small entrepreneurial firms: the power of connectivity

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.10.1007/BF02294359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, T.L., & Hall, B. J. (1991). Facilitating talk about new ideas: The role of personal relationships in organizational innovation. Communication Monographs, 58, 273–288.10.1080/03637759109376230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management Review, 39, 423–438.10.5465/amr.2012.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58.10.2307/41165921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima, K., & Li, H. Y. (2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 583–597.10.2307/20159603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/0471725153
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, P. F. (2009). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, M., & Wennberg, K. (2014). Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 421–436.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, J., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34, 816–835.10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bushe, G. R. (2010). Generativity and the transformational potential of appreciative inquiry. In D. Zandee, D. L. Cooperrider, & M. Avital (Eds.), Organizational generativity: Advances in appreciative inquiry (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Caridi-Zahavi, O., Carmeli, A., & Arazy, O. (2016). The influence of CEOs visionary innovation leadership on the performance of high-technology ventures: The mediating roles of connectivity and knowledge integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 356–376.10.1111/jpim.2016.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2011). The call for generativity. In A. Carlsen, & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Research alive: Exploring generative moments in the doing qualitative research (pp. 12–24). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Dothan, A. (2017). Generative work relationships as a source of direct and indirect learning from experiences of failure: Implications for innovation agility and product innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 119, 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for Innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 169–191.10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Friedman, Y., & Tishler, A. (2013). Cultivating a resilient top management team: The importance of relational connections and strategic decision comprehensiveness. Safety Science, 51, 148–159.10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Jones, C. D., & Binyamin, G. (2016). The power of caring and generativity in building strategic adaptability. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 46–72. doi:10.1111/joop.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanias, R.P., & Helfat, C. E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17, 155–171.10.1177/014920639101700110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17.10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice, 23, 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259.10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201.10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A., & Mills, P. K. (1985). Managerial practices that enhance innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 24–34.10.1016/0090-2616(85)90041-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create a sustain high-quality connections at work. San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E., & Carlsen, A. (2011). Seeing, feeling, daring, interrelating and playing: Exploring themes in generative moments. In A. Carlsen, & J.E. Dutton (Eds.), Research alive: Exploring generative moments in the doing qualitative research (pp. 214–235). Copenhagen, Denmark: Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E., & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 263–278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E., & Ragins, B. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Lilius, J. M., & Kanov, J. M. (2007). The transformative potential of compassion at work. In S. K. Piderit, R. E. Fry, & D. L. Cooperrider (Eds.), Handbook of transformative cooperation: New designs and dynamics (pp. 107–126). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenbeiss, S.A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438–1446.10.1037/a0012716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review, 40, 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (2013). Top management teams and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 40, 805–816.10.1007/s11187-013-9473-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17–37.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons, R.A. (2003). Acts of gratitude in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 81–92). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Ensley, M. D., & Pearson, A. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 267–284.10.1111/etap.2005.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escriba-Esteve, A., Sanchez-Peinado, L., & Sanchez-Peinado, E. (2009). The influence of top management teams in the strategic orientation and performance of small and medium sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 20, 581–597.10.1111/bjom.2009.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, J., & Ford, C. (1990). Individual Innovation. In M. West, & J. Farr (Eds.), Managing Innovation (pp. 207–230). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D.P. (2007). Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Academy of Management Review, 32, 361–376.10.5465/AMR.2007.24349585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445–466.10.2307/256039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Love 2.0: How our supreme emotion affects everything we feel, think, do, and become. New York, NY: Hudson Street Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 399–423.10.2307/255932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Y., Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2016). How CEOs and TMTs build adaptive capacity in small entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 996–1018.10.1111/joms.2016.53.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S. (2001). Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27, 3–21.10.1177/014920630102700103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, L. M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee pro-environmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81–91.10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Editor Forum: Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons – the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401–418.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 11–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A.B. (2006). Bridging old worlds and building new ones: Towards a microsociology of creativity. In L. Thompson (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in groups and organizations (pp. 199–216). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly, A. (2009). Decision comprehensiveness and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of managerial uncertainty preferences and environmental dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1289–1314.10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, J. G., Tedlie, J. C., & Lehn, D. A. (1995). Modeling the relation of personality variables to symptom complaints: The unique role of negative affectivity. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Issues and applications (pp. 217–236). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145.10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, R.D., & Miller, C. C. (2004). Decision-making and firm success. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 8–12.10.5465/AME.2004.15268665
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661–1674.10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS Command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific International Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R.B. (1983). The change masters. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R.M. (2006). Confidence: How winning streaks and losing streaks begin and end. New York, NY: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R., Chen, E. L., & Piezunka, H. (2012). All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 116–132.10.1002/sej.v6.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207.10.1177/109442810032003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173.10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740–765.10.1177/0002764203260208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, H.P., Patterson, M. G., Birdi, K. S., Leiva, P. I., & Kausel, E. E. (2014). The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 234–256.10.1002/job.v35.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Antill, J. K., & Cunningham, J. D. (1989). Masculinity and femininity: A bipolar construct and independent constructs. Journal of Personality, 57, 625–663.10.1111/jopy.1989.57.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., Maynard, M. T., & Mangos, M. M. (2010). Interactive effects of team and task shared mental models as related to air traffic controllers’ collective efficacy and effectiveness. Human Performance, 23, 22–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262–292.10.2189/asqu.51.2.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2008). Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Towards a more complete understanding. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 598–620.10.1002/bdm.v21:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39–58.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1, 2–10.10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, P.C. (1999). Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P., & Brown, V. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 248–265.10.1111/spco.2007.1.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & van der Zee, K. I. (2015). Creative processes in culturally diverse teams. In S. Otten, K. I. van der Zee, & M. Brewer (Eds.), Towards inclusive organizations: Determinants of successful diversity management at work (pp. 108–131). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P., Nakui, T., Putman, V.L., & Brown, V. R. (2006). Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 206–219.10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., & Kohn, N. (2012). Collaborative creativity – group creativity and team innovation. In M. D. Mumford (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 327–357). New York, NY: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00014-8
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51–67.10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation the moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41, 769–788.10.1177/0149206312441210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.10.2307/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Party On! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 489–507.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.10.2307/256987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.10.2307/2393297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 346–357.10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniezek, J.A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124–155.10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 152–173.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, J. P., & Heaphy, E., Dutton, J. E. (2011). High quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, & G., & Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 385–399). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87–98.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter, C. J., Kistruck, G. M., & Morris, S. (2014). Adaptations to knowledge templates in base-of-the-pyramid markets: The role of social interaction. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8, 303–320.10.1002/sej.v8.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorescu, K., & Erev, I. (2014). On the decision to explore new alternatives: The coexistence of under- and over-exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 109–123.10.1002/bdm.v27.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Small Business Administration (SBA). (2006). Small business size standards matched to North American industry classification system. Retrieved from https://www.sba.gov/size/sizetable2002.html
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1998). Introductory essay – improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555.10.1287/orsc.9.5.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltbank, R., Dew, N., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 981–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar