Expanding organisational knowledge online: the role of bridging members in knowledge expansion in online groups

References

• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2016). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. R. (2000). Knowing what and whom other people know: Linking transactive memory with external connections in organizational groups. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1(1), F1–F6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2000.5535165
   Google Scholar
• Baralou, E., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). How is new organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organization Studies, 36(5), 593–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolotti, F., Mattarelli, E., Vignoli, M., & Macrì, D. M. (2015). Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology. Research Policy, 44(4), 911–924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-7084-x
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Harrysson, M. (2015). Transforming the business through social tools. McKinsey&Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/transforming-the-business-through-social-tools
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Martin, H. (2016). How social tools can reshape the organization. McKinsey&Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/how-social-tools-can-reshape-the-organization
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes : The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2009). Network duality of social capital. In V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Social capital: Reaching out, reaching in (pp. 39–65). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S., & Soda, G. (2017). Social origins of great strategies. Strategy Science, 2(4), 226–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2017.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/521848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Chang, H., & Wang, T. C. (2010). Collective brokering practice: A constellation of practices perspective. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning, Aalborg, Denmark, (pp. 88–96).
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. P. Y., Evans, N., Choo, K. K. R., & Tan, F. B. (2015). What influences employees to use enterprise social networks? A socio-technical perspective. PACIS 2015 - proceedings, paper 54.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/20159632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go–or stop. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 104–112. https://hbr.org/2002/06/the-people-who-make-organizations-go-or-stop
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, P., & Cano Rubio, M. (2019). The curve of knowledge transfer: A theoretical model. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deichmann, D., Moser, C., Birkholz, J. M., Nerghes, A., Groenewegen, P., & Wang, S. (2020). Ideas with impact: How connectivity shapes idea diffusion. Research Policy, 49(1), 103881. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deichmann, D., Moser, C., & van den Ende, J. (2020). Talk, talk, talk: Exploring idea conversations and the micro-level foundations of knowledge sharing for innovation. Innovation: Organization & Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1763177
   Google Scholar
• Dimicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., Muller, M., & Street, R. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, San Diego, United States, (pp. 711–720).
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L., & Moore, P. J. (2016). Digitizing strength of weak ties: Understanding social network relationships through online discourse analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735258
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. (2015). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214540510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., von Krogh, G., Monteiro, E., & Lakhani, K. R. (2016). Online community as space for knowledge flows. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 668–684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (Third ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Muhlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., & Galunic, C. (2009). The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313513612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. L. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017713724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, I., Ronen, I., Zwerdling, N., Zuyev-Grabovitch, I., & Jacovi, M. (2016). What is your organization “like”? A study of liking activity in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, United States, (pp. 3025–3037).
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy, N., Halali, E., & Zlatev, J. J. (2019). Brokerage and brokering: An integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 215–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M., Mors, M., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 41–86). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W., Fang, Y., & Wei, K. (2009). The role of trust in promoting organizational knowledge seeking using knowledge management systems: An empirical investigation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 526–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 767–797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S. W., & Cheng, M. J. (2013). Are you ready for knowledge sharing? An empirical study of virtual communities. Computers and Education, 62, 8–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, N. (2016). Role of knowledge brokers in communities of practice in Japan. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1302–1317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., Johnson, J., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026–3048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., & Ransbotham, S. (2016). Content as community regulator: The recursive relationship between consumption and contribution in open collaboration communities. Organization Science, 27(5), 1258–1274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffeld-Monz, M., & Fritsch, M. (2013). Who are the knowledge brokers in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis. Regional Studies, 47(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1981). Ringelmann revisited : Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172007
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Chung, K. (2020). Knowledge expansion of metadata using script mining analysis in multimedia recommendation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08774-0
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., & Chung, G. H. (2017). Implementing innovations within organizations: A systematic review and research agenda. Innovation, 19(3), 372–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2017.1335943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (1997). The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. The Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 730–757. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9708210724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenius, T., Laurikkala, J., Järvelin, K., & Juhola, M. (2004). Stemming and lemmatization in the clustering of finnish text documents. In International conference on information and knowledge management, proceedings, Washington D.C., United States, (pp. 625–633).
   Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In S. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 16, pp. 183–210). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, S., Rondi, E., Levin, D. Z., De Massis, A., & Brass, D. (2020). Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1092–1120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320914694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecoutre, M. (2019). Expanding knowledge and mobilizing social networks. In P. Lièvre, M. Aubry, & G. Garel (Eds.), Management of extreme situations: From polar expeditions to exploration‐oriented organizations (pp. 289–303). ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., Stewart, D., & Calugar-Pop, C. (2013). Technology, media & telecommunications predictions. New York: Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Technology-Media-Telecommunications/gx-TMT-Predictions2013-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lehtimäki, H., Uusikylä, P., & Smedlund, A. (2020). Society as an interaction space : A systemic approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796–816. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2017). The social media revolution: Sharing and learning in the age of leaky knowledge. Information and Organization, 27(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingo, E. L., & O’Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 47–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Christiansen, T., Baumgartner, W. A., & Verspoor, K. (2012). BioLemmatizer: A lemmatization tool for morphological processing of biomedical text. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 3(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-3-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannucci, P. V., & Yong, K. (2018). The differential impact of knowledge depth and knowledge breadth on creativity over individual careers. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1741–1763. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C., Groenewegen, P., & Ferguson, J. E. (2017). Meaning in organizational networks - from social to digital and back. In P. Groenewegen, J. E. Ferguson, C. Moser, J. W. Mohr, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Structure, content and meaning of organizational networks (Vol. 53, pp. 211–229). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers and Education, 58(4), 1049–1057. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima, N. A., Halali, E., & Halevy, N. (2017). Third parties promote cooperative norms in repeated interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 212–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Mis Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nollert, M. (2010). Kreuzung sozialer Kreise: Auswirkungen und Wirkungsgeschichte. In C. Stegbauer & R. Häußling (Eds.), Handbuch Netzwerkforschung (pp. 157–165). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. E. (2016). Knowledge management and enterprise social networking: Content versus collaboration. In L. Razmerita, G. Phillips-Wren, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Innovations in knowledge management (pp. 45–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D., Borgatti, S. P., & Davis, J. (2014). Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. In D. J. Brass, G. Labianca, A. Mehra, D. S. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks (Vol. 40, pp. 135–159). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/20159627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M. H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patalas-Maliszewska, J. (2013). Managing knowledge workers : Value assessment, methods, and application tools. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Piezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pluut, H., Flestea, A. M., & Curşeu, P. L. (2014). Multiple team membership: A demand or resource for employees? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponis, S., & Koronis, E. (2012). A knowledge management process-based approach to support corporate crisis management. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1390
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintane, E., & Carnabuci, G. (2016). How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organization Science, 27(6), 1343–1360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., Sing, P. V., & Krishnan, R. (2015). Forgotten third parties: Analyzing the contingent association between unshared third parties, knowledge overlap, and knowledge transfer relationships with outsiders. Organization Science, 26(5), 1400–1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reysen, S., Lloyd, J. D., Katzarska-Miller, I., Lemker, B. M., & Foss, R. L. (2010). Intragroup status and social presence in online fan groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1314–1317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., & Schippers, M. C. (2010). Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 639–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon, D., Becker, F., Eckardt, L., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2019). One for all and all for one - towards a framework for collaboration support systems. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1837–1861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9651-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soda, G., Tortoriello, M., & Iorio, A. (2018). Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 896–918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuetzer, C. M., Koehler, T., Carley, K. M., & Thiem, G. (2013). “Brokering” behavior in collaborative learning systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 100, 94–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.702
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. K., Humphrey, S. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 314–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., Alexy, O., Block, J., & Sandner, P. G. (2016). The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 393–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216637849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., Criscuolo, P., McEvily, B., & Salter, A. (2020). Dual networking: How collaborators network in their quest for innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 000183921989369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219893691
   Google Scholar
• Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortoriello, M., McEvily, B., & Krackhardt, D. (2015). Being a catalyst of innovation: The role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organization Science, 26(2), 423–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch, A., Busser, B., Canisius, S., & Daelemans, W. (2007). An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. LOT Occasional Series, 7, 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gompel, M., & Reynaert, M. (2013). FoLiA: A practical XML format for linguistic annotation - a descriptive and comparative study. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 3, 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Van Swol, L. M., & Kane, A. A. (2019). Language and group processes: An integrative, interdisciplinary review. Small Group Research, 50(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418785019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/649497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Butler, B. S., & Ren, Y. (2013). The impact of membership overlap on growth: An ecological competition view of online groups. Organization Science, 24(2), 414–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Modeling participation in an online travel community. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258824
   Google Scholar
• Wehner, B., Ritter, C., & Leist, S. (2017). Enterprise social networks: A literature review and research agenda. Computer Networks, 114, 125–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2018). Understanding knowledge networks and knowledge flows in high technology clusters: The role of heterogeneity of knowledge contents. Innovation, 20(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2017.1369355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. J., Marhold, K., & Kang, J. (2017). Linking the firm’s knowledge network and subsequent exploratory innovation: A study based on semiconductor industry patent data. Innovation, 19(4), 463–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2017.1358101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar