References
- Bailey, D. E., & Leonardi, P. M. (2015). Technology choices: Why occupations differ in their embrace of new technology. MIT Press.
- Bailey, D. E., Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2012). The lure of the virtual. Organization Science, 23(5), 1485–1504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0703
- Barley, W. C. (2015). Anticipatory work: How the need to represent knowledge across boundaries shapes work practices within them. Organization Science, 26(6), 1612–1628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1012
- Becker, M. C., Salvatore, P., & Zirpoli, F. (2005). The impact of virtual simulation tools on problem-solving and new product development organization. Research Policy, 34(9), 1305–1321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.016
- Beunza, D. (2019). Taking the floor: Models, morals, and management in a wall street trading room. Princeton University Press.
- Boland, R. J., Jr, Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0304
- Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
- Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. (2007). “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organization Science, 18(5), 849–864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0287
- Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. (2012). Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0700
- Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage vs. Breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
- Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Harvard Business Press.
- Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3094872
- Jonsson, K., Mathiassen, L., & Holmström, J. (2018). Representation and mediation in digitalized work: Evidence from maintenance of mining machinery. Journal of Information Technology, 33(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0050-x
- Langewiesche, W. (2019). What really brought down the boeing 737 max? The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/magazine/boeing-737-max-crashes.html
- Leonardi, P. M. (2011). Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organization Science, 22(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0529
- Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Car crashes without cars: Lessons about simulation technology and organizational change from automotive design. MIT Press.
- Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04
- Lobo, S., & Whyte, J. (2017). Aligning and reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery. Research Policy, 46(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005
- Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Mis Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
- Thomke, S. H. (2003). Experimentation matters: Unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Harvard Business Press.
- Thomke, S. H. (2020). Experimentation works: The surprising power of business experiments. Harvard Business Press.
- Tufte, E. (2006). The cognitive style of powerpoint: Pitching out corrupts within (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.
- Turkle, S. (2010). Simulation and its discontents. MIT press.
- Woo, D. (2019a). Exit strategies in interorganizational collaboration: Setting the stage for re-entry. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219851418
- Woo, D. (2019b). Reconceptualizing interorganizational collaborations as tensile structures: Implications of conveners’ proactive tension management. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 158-183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1526389
- Woo, D., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Breaking into collaboration: Communicative strategies for gaining entry when you are not invited. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1127–1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy052
- Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Jr, Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
- Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research Commentary the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322