Computer experiment: A case study for modelling and simulation of manufacturing systems

References

• Bartell, S. M., Landrum, J. P., Giesy, J. P. & Leversee, G. J. 1981, “Simulated transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in artificialstreams”, Energy and Ecological Modelling, Mitch, W. J., Bosserman, R. W. & Klopatek, J. M. (editors), pp. 133–143, Elsevier, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bartell, S. M., Gardner, R. H., O’Neill, R. V. & Giddings, J. M. 1983, “Error analysis of predicted fate of anthracene in a simulated pond”, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 2, pp. 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Birk, D. M. 1991, An Introduction to Mathematical Fire Modeling, Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, P. B., Williams, B. J., Santer, T. J., Notz, W. I. & Bartel, D. L. 1999, “Robust Optimization of Total Joint Replacements Incorporating Environmental Variables”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 121, pp. 304–310.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. 1980, “Estimating safe available egress time from fires”, Technical report 80–2172, Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. Y. & Forney, G. P. 1990, “The Consolidated Compartment Fire Model (CCFM) Computer Code Application CCFM. Vents-Part I: Physical Basis”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 4342, Gaithersburg, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Currin, C., Mitchell, T., Morris, M. & Ylvisaker, D. 1988, “A Bayesian Approach to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments”, Technical Report 6498, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger, A. S. 1962, “Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in the Generalized Linear Regression Model”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 57, pp. 369–375.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. R. 1975, “Use of all relatives in intraherd prediction of breeding values and producing abilities”, Journal of Dairy Sciences, Vol. 58, pp. 1910–1916.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. P., Hansen, S. E. & Fahey, P. M. 1984, “Suprem III — A program for integrated circuit process modeling and simulation”, TR-SEL84 1, Stanford Electronics Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. R. 1990, “Design and Estimation Issues in Computer Experiments”, Technical Report No: 359, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. & Frenklach, M. 1983, “Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation in dynamic modeling of chemical kinetics”, International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, Vol. 15, pp. 677–696.
   Google Scholar
• Nassif, S. R., Strojwas, A. J. & Director, S. W. 1984, “FABRICS II: a statistically based IC fabrication process simulator”, IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 3, pp. 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Schiller, B. S. & Welch, W. J. 1989a, “Designs for Computer Experiments”, Technometrics, Vol. 31, pp. 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Welch, W. J, Mitchell, T. J. & Wynn, H. P. 1989b, “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments”, Journal of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 409–435.
   Google Scholar
• Sahama, T. R. & Diamond, N. T. 2001, “Sample Size Considerations and Augmentation of Computer Experiments”, J. Statist. Comput. Simul., Vol. 68, pp. 307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifzadeh, S., Koehler, J. R., Owen, A. B. & Shott, J. D. 1989, “Using simulators to model transmitted variability in IC manufacturing”, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, W. D. 1985, “ASET-B: A Room Fire Program for Personal Computers”, NBSIR 85-3144-1, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, W. J. & Sacks, J. 1991, “A System for Quality Improvement Via Computer Experiments”, Communication in Statistics, -Theory and Methods, Vol. 20, pp. 477–495.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, W. J., Buck, R. J., Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Mitchell, T. J. & Morris, M. D. 1992, “Screening, Predicting and Computer Experiments”, Technometrics, Vol. 34, pp. 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, W. J., Buck, R. B., Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Morris, M. D. & Schonlau, M. 1996, “Letters to the Editor. Response to James M. Lucas”, Technometrics, Vol. 38, pp. 199–203.
   Google Scholar