Numerical and experimental predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process

References

• Abbassi, F., F. Ahmad, S. Gulzar, T. Belhadj, A. Karrech, and H. Choi. 2020. “Design of T-shaped Tube Hydroforming Using Finite Element and Artificial Neural Network Modelling.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 34 (3): 1129–1138. doi:10.1007/s12206-020-0214-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdessalem, A. B., and A. E. Hami. 2014. “Global Sensitivity Analysis and Multi-objective Optimisation of Loading Path in Tube Hydroforming Process Based on Metamodelling Techniques.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 71: 753–773. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5518-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrantes, J. P., A. Szabo-Ponce, and G. F. Batalha. 2005. “Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Tube Hydroforming (THF).” Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier BV, 164–165: 1140–1147. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshar, A., R. Hashemi, R. Madoliat, D. Rahmatabadi, and B. Hadiyan. 2017. “Numerical and Experimental Study of Bursting Prediction in Tube Hydroforming of Al 7020-T6.” Mechanics & Industry 18 (4): 11. doi:10.1051/meca/2017019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmetoglu, M., and T. Altan. 2000. “Tube Hydroforming: State-of-the-art and Future Trends.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 98 (1): 25–33. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00302-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswad, A., K. Y. Benyounis, and A. G. Olabi. 2012. “Tube Hydroforming Process: A Reference Guide.” Materials & Design 33: 328–339. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydemir, A., J. H. P. Devree, W. A. M. Brekelmans, M. G. D. Geers, W. H. Sillekens, and R. J. Werkhoven. 2005. “An Adaptive Simulation Approach Designed for Tube Hydroforming Processes.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 159 (3): 303–310. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., X. Xiao, H. Guo, and J. Tong. 2018. “Deformation Behaviour, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pure Copper Subjected to Tube Hydroforming.” Materials Science and Engineering A 731: 331–343. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Z. Yu, B. Hou, S. Li, and Z. Lin. 2011. “A Theoretical and Experimental Study on Forming Limit Diagram for A Seamed Tube Hydroforming.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (12): 2012–2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpani, A., A. Fiorentino, and E. Ceretti. 2020. “Characterization and Optimization of the Hydroforming Process of AISI 316L Steel Hydraulic Tubes.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 107 (1–2): 293–309. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05067-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmann, F., and C. Hartl. 1996. “Hydroforming––A Method to Manufacture Lightweight Parts.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 60 (1–4): 669–676. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi, A., F. Biglari, and M. R. Morovvati. 2010. “Influences of Inner Pressure and Tube Thickness on Process Responses of Hydroforming Copper Tubes without Axial Force.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 224 (12): 1866–1878. doi:10.1243/09544054JEM2001.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. M. 1968. “Application of Strain Analysis to Sheet Metal Forming Problems in the Press Shop.” Metall Ital 60: 767–774. doi:10.4271/680093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., Y. Woo, T. Hwang, I. Oh, Y. Hoon, and Moon. 2019. “Tailor Layered Tube Hydroforming for Fabricating Tubular Parts with Dissimilar Thickness.” International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 138: 51–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl, C. 2005. “Research and Advances in Fundamentals and Industrial Applications of Hydroforming.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 167 (2–3): 383–392. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfrick, M. N., C. Niezrecki, P. Avitable, and T. Schmidt. 2011. “3D Digital Image Correlation Methods for Full-field Vibration Measurement.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25: 917–927. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. 1948. “A Theory of the Yielding and Plastic Flow of Anisotropic Metals.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 193 (1033): 281–297. doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. J., H. K. Kim, and B. S. Kang. 2005. “Tube Size Effect on Hydroforming Formability.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 160 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler, S. P., and W. A. Backofen. 1963. “Plastic Instability and Fracture in Sheets Stretched over Rigid Punches.” Trans ASM 56: 25–48. doi:hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120282.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Y. W. Kim, B. S. Kang, and S. M. Hwang. 2004. “Finite Element Analysis for Bursting Failure Prediction in Bulge Forming of a Seamed Tube.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. Elsevier BV, 40 (9–10): 953–966. doi10.1016/j.finel.2003.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. W., W. J. Song, B. S. Kang, and J. Kim. 2009. “Bursting Failure Prediction in Tube Hydroforming Using FLSD.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 41: 311–322. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1488-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, T. F., X. Z. Lu, and L. C. Chan. 2019. “Analysis and Reduction of Wrinkling Defects for Tube-hydroforming Magnesium Alloy Components at Elevated Temperatures.” Materials & Design 173: 107761. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., P. P. Date, and K. Narasimhan. 1994. “A New Criterion to Predict Necking Failure under Biaxial Stretching.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier BV, 45 (1–4): 583–588. doi10.1016/0924-0136(94)90402-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, A., G. Ngaile, and T. Altan. 2004a. “Optimizing Tube Hydroforming Using Process Simulation and Experimental Verification.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Elsevier BV, 146 (1): 137–143. doi10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00854-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. A. U., G. Ngaile, and T. Altan. 2004b. “Optimizing Tube Hydroforming Using Process Simulation and Experimental Verification.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 146 (1): 137–143. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00854-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, L. H., Z. R. Wang, D. C. Kang, S. J. Yuan, S. H. Zhang, and J. Danckert. 2004. “Hydroforming Highlights: Sheet Hydroforming and Tube Hydroforming.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 151 (1–3): 165–177. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. G., Y. P. Korkolis, and J. H. Kim. 2015. “Recent Developments in Hydroforming Technology.” Journal of Engineering Manufacture 229 (2): 572–596. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00206-X.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. B. 1996. “A Comparison of Empirical Forming Limit Curves for Low Carbon Steel with Theoretical Forming Limit Curves of Ramaekers and Bongaerts.” IDDRG WG3. Ungarn.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, N., and J. Lord. 2010. “Digital Image Correlation.” Materials Today 12: 52–54. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70235-2.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, S., A. Omar, and K. Narasimhan. 2013. “Finite Element Analysis for Optimising Process Parameters in Tube Hydroforming Process.” IDDRG Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Naghibi, M. F., M. Gerdooei, and M. B. Jooybari. 2016. “Experimental and Numerical Study on Forming Limit Diagrams of 304 Stainless Steel Tubes in the Hydroforming Process.” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. Springer Nature, 25 (12): 5460–5467. doi10.1007/s11665-016-2382-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandedkar, V. M. 2002. “Formability Studies on a Deep Drawing Quality Steel.” Doctoral diss., Ph. D. thesis. Mumbai, India: IIT Bombay.
   Google Scholar
• Nikhare, C., and K. Narasimhan. 2008. “Limit Strain Comparison during Tube and Sheet Hydroforming and Sheet Stamping Processes by Numerical Simulation.” CM 7 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nikhare, C., M. Weiss, and P. D. Hodgson. 2009. “FEA Comparison of High and Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming of TRIP Steel.” Computational Materials Science. Elsevier BV, 47 (1): 146–152. doi10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, A., A. Harisankar, K. R. Tewari, and K. Narasimhan. 2016. “Effect of Geometric Parameters on Formability and Strain Path during Tube Hydroforming Process.” Journal of Physics. Conference Series 734 (3). 032104. 2016. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/734/3/032104.
   Google Scholar
• Omar, A., A. Tewari, and K. Narasimhan. 2015. “Formability and Microstructure Evolution during Hydroforming of Drawing Quality Welded Steel Tube.” The Journal of Strain Analysis 50 (7): 542–556. doi:10.1177/0309324715600983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, A., A. Tewari, and K. Narasimhan. 2020. “Effect of Bulge Ratio on the Deformation Behaviour and Fracture Location during Welded Steel Tube Hydroforming Process.” Results in Materials 6: 100096. doi:10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100096.
   Google Scholar
• Pambhar, A., and K. Narasimhan. 2013. “Prediction of Stress and Strain Based Forming Limit Diagram during Tube Hydroforming Process.” Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 66: 665–669. doi:10.1007/s12666-013-0336-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A. K., B. S. Walunj, and P. P. Date. 2018. “Simulation Based Approach for Light Weighting of Transmission Components Using Tube Hydroforming.” Procedia Manufacturing 15: 915–922. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.405.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, P. V., B. V. Reddy, and P. J. Ramulu. 2020a. “An Investigation on Tube Hydroforming Process considering the Effect of Frictional Coefficient and Corner Radius.” Advances In Materials And Processing Technologies 6 (1): 84–103. doi:10.1080/2374068X.2019.1707437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, P. V., B. V. Reddy, and P. J. Ramulu. 2020b. “Effect of Heat Treatment Temperatures on Formability of SS 304 during Tube Hydroforming Process.” SN Applied Sciences 2 (205). doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2026-7.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., H. Jin, P. D. Wu, and D. J. Lloyd. 2017. “Effects of Superimposed Hydrostatic Pressure on Necking and Fracture of Tube under Hydroforming.” International Journal of Solids and Structures 113–114: 209–217. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanakijkasem, P., A. Pattarangkun, S. Mahabunphachai, V. Uthaisangsuk, and S. Chutima. 2015. “Comparative Study of Finite Element Analysis in Tube Hydroforming of Stainless Steel 304.” International Journal of Automotive Technology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 16 (4): 611–617. doi10.1007/s12239-015-0062-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., S. Seyedkashi, B. Joo, and Y. Moon. 2014. “Analytical Prediction of Forming Pressure for Three-layered Tube Hydroforming.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. SAGE Publications, 229 (9): 1575–1583. doi10.1177/0954405414539489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., G. Hu, and J. Liu. 2015. “Investigation of Forming Limit Diagram for Tube Hydroforming considering Effect of Changing Strain Path.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 79 (5–8): 793–803. doi10.1007/s00170-015-6842-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Q. Kong, C. Ma, and Z. Lin. 2014. “Theoretical and Experimental Study on Formability of Laser Seamed Tube Hydroforming.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 75: 305–315. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6130-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Z. He, Y. Lin, K. Zheng, X. Fanb, and S. Yuan. 2020. “The Development of a Novel Forming Limit Diagram under Nonlinear Loading Paths in Tube Hydroforming.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 172: 105392. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar