On the use of socioeconomic typologies for improved integrated management of data-poor regions: explorations from the Australian north

References

• Australian Government 2008, Land managers' capacity to change and adopt sustainable management practices: indicator protocol, viewed 12 March 2009, <http://nlwra.gov.au/files/products/national-land-and-water-resources-audit/pn21522/pn21522.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, IJ, Jones, AP, Nishikawa, N & Brouwer, R 2000, Benefits transfer in theory and practice: a review, CSERGE Working Paper GEC 2000-25, viewed 7 April 2010, <http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_2000_25.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S, Haynes, M, van Gellecum, Y & Hoon Han, Y 2007, ‘Considering regional socio-economic outcomes in non-metropolitan Australia: a typology building approach’, Papers in Regional Science, vol. 86, pp. 261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F, Colding, J & Folke, C 2002, Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge University Press, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bohensky, E, Stone-Jovicich, S, Larson, S & Marshall, N 2010, ‘Adaptive capacity in theory and reality: implications for governance in the Great Barrier Reef region’, in D Armitage & R Plummer (eds.), Adaptive capacity: building environmental governance in an age of uncertainty, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, KJ & Bergstrom, JC 1992, ‘Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism’, Water Resources Research, vol. 28, pp. 657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, RJ 2004, The concepts, process and methods of Social Impact Assessment, Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Burnside, D 2007, The relationship between community vitality, viability and health, and natural resources and their management – a brief review of the literature, URS Australia Pty Ltd for the National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, D, Taylor, A & Campbell, S 2009, Demographic trends and likely futures for Australia's Tropical Rivers, Land and Water Australia, Canberra, viewed 28 November 2009, <http://www.track.gov.au/publications/registry/770>.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M, Ross, H, Maclean, K, Owens, K & Witt, B 2008, ‘Reporting social outcomes of development: an analysis of diverse approaches’, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science, vol. 3 no. 6, pp. 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, F 2000, Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries, Oxford University Press, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Emtage, N & Herbohn, J 2012, ‘Assessing rural landholders' diversity in the Wet Tropics region of Queensland Australia: a market segmentation approach’, Agricultural Systems, vol. 110, pp. 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emtage, NF, Herbohn, JL & Harrison, SR 2006, ‘Landholder typologies used in the development of natural resource management programs in Australia: a review’, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 13, pp. 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fargher, JD, Howard, BM, Burnside, DG & Andrew, MH 2003, ‘The economy of the rangelands: myth or mystery’, The Rangeland Journal, vol. 25, pp. 140–156.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, M 2008, The scope and contribution of social sciences in natural resource management, Department of Agriculture and Food, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, MA & Jackson, S 2011, ‘Protecting Indigenous values in water management: a challenge to conventional environmental flow assessments’, Ecosystems, vol. 14, pp. 1232–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooch, M & Warburton, J 2009, ‘Building and managing resilience in community-based NRM groups: an Australian case study’, Society and Natural Resources, vol. 22, pp. 158–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, A 2007, ‘Data integration issues in research supporting sustainable natural resource management’, Geographical Research, vol. 45, pp. 376–386.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, V & Lockie, S 2002, ‘Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management’, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 18, pp. 419–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, JH 1996, ‘Diversity and change in Australia's rangelands regions: translating resource values into regional benefits’, The Rangeland Journal, vol. 19, pp. 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• IFC (International Finance Corporation) 2003, Addressing the social dimensions of private sector projects, Good Practice Note No. 3, World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-organisational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment 2003, ‘Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 21, pp. 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S 2006, ‘Compartmentalising culture: the articulation and consideration of Indigenous values in water resource management’, Australian Geographer, vol. 37, pp. 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S 2008, ‘Recognition of Indigenous interests in Australian water resource management, with particular reference to environmental flow assessment’, Geography Compass, vol. 2, pp. 874–898.
   Google Scholar
• Kennard, MJ, Pusey, BJ, Olden, JD, Mackay, SJ, Stein, JL & Marsh, N 2010, ‘Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management’, Freshwater Biology, vol. 55, pp. 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land and Water Australia 2005, The Tropical Rivers Program, Land and Water, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, S 2009, ‘Communicating stakeholder priorities in the Great Barrier Reef region’, Society and Natural Resources, vol. 22, pp. 650–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, S & Alexandridis, K 2009, Socio-economic profiling of tropical rivers, Land and Water Australia, Canberra, viewed 28 November 2009, <http://www.track.gov.au/publications/registry/422>.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, S & Larson, S 2007, ‘An index-based tool for ranking of social impacts of the hydropower project alternatives in the pre-feasibility stage of the project’, Energy, vol. 32, pp. 943–947.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, MC 2007, Drought, governance and adaptive capacity in North East Brazil: a case study of Ceará. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world, UNDP Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper No. 50/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Maru, YT & Chewings, VH 2008, ‘How can we identify socio-regions in the rangelands of Australia?’, The Rangeland Journal, vol. 30, pp. 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003, Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J 2009, Business management for tropical dairy farmers, Landlinks Press, Collingwood, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M, Durante, J, Greig, J & Ward, J 2008, Encouraging participation in market based instruments and incentive programs, final report prepared for Land and Water Australia, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R, Webb, T & Byron, I 2006, Socio-economic data: prioritising collection to support Australian government natural resource management programs, ABARE–BRS report prepared for the National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra, Australia, .
   Google Scholar
• Northern Australia Land and Water Science Review 2009, Chapter summaries, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, Canberra, viewed 19 July 2010, <http://www.nalwt.gov.au/science_review.aspx>.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Australia Water Futures Assessment 2009, Water in northern Australia: summary of reports to the Australian government from the CSIRO Northern Australia Sustainable Yields Project, CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship and Northern Australia Water Futures Assessment, Canberra, viewed 19 July 2010, <http://www.csiro.au/files/files/ps7l.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, ME & Merwin, DJ 1977, ‘Toward a methodology for conducting social impact assessments using quality of social life indicators’, in K Finsterbusch & CP Wolf (eds.), Methodology of social impact assessment, Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsberg, PA, pp. 43–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E 2007, ‘Multiple institutions for multiple outcomes’, in A Smajgl & S Larson (eds.), Sustainable resource use: institutional dynamics and economics, Earthscan, London, pp. 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, J 2007, Capitalism as if the world matters, Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, NB, Tucker, DI, Leviston, Z, Russell, SN, Po, M, Fry, AJ, McIntyre, W, Nancarrow, BE & Bates, LE 2007, Partnerships and understanding towards targeted implementation: identifying factors influencing land management practices, Science Report 29/07, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, L & Dovers, S 2007, ‘NRM regions in Australia: the “haves” and the “have nots”’, Geographical Research, vol. 45, pp. 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimodaira, H 2004, ‘Approximately unbiased tests of regions using multistep-multiscale bootstrap resampling’, Annals of Statistics, vol. 32, pp. 2616–2641.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford Smith, M 2008, ‘The “desert syndrome” – a causal chain of factors characterising Outback Australia’, The Rangeland Journal, vol. 30, pp. 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J, Clouston, B & Binney, J 2004, Conducting social and economic impact assessment: a practical guide for regional NRM bodies, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckl, N, Neil, B, Welters, R & Larson, S 2012, Resident perceptions of the relative importance of socio-cultural, biodiversity, and commercial values in Australia's tropical rivers, report for the North Australia Water Futures Assessment, James Cook University, Townsville, viewed 25 May 2012, <http://www.environment.gov.au/water/publications/action/nawfa-tropical-rivers.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckl, N & Stanley, O 2007, ‘Key industries in Australia's tropical savanna’, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, vol. 13, pp. 255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckl, N, Stanley, O, Jackson, S, Straton, A & Brown, V 2006, An assessment of the social and economic values of Australia's tropical rivers, Land and Water Australia, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, V 2005, ‘Water works: agency and creativity in the Mitchell River’, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, vol. 16, pp. 366–381.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, CN, Bryan, CH & Goodrich, CG 2004, Social assessment: theory, process and techniques, 3rd edn, Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Initiative) 2009, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers – summary: responding to the value of nature, UNEP, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, HG 1982, ‘Genetic variation of rectal temperature in cows and its relationship to fertility’, Animal Production, vol. 35, pp. 401–412.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F 2003, Social impact assessment: international principles, International Association for Impact Assessment, Special Publication Series No. 2, viewed 14 March 2008, <http://www.iaia.org/Members/Publications/Guidelines_Principles/SP2.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, J 2005, ‘Using a typology of tree-growers to guide forestry extension’. Annals of Tropical Research, vol. 27, pp. 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, KK & Straton, A 2010, ‘An economic assessment of the value of tropical river ecosystem services: heterogeneous preferences among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians’, Ecological Economics, vol. 69, pp. 2417–2426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar