Defining Best Practice Carbon Management in an Australian context

References

• Alvarez, I 2012, ‘Impact of CO2 emission variation on firm performance’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 435–454.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P & Tushman, M 2001, ‘Organizational environments and industry exit: the effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 675–711.10.1093/icc/10.3.675
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government 2012, Clean energy future – an overview of the clean energy legislativepackage. Australian Government Clean Energy Future, viewed July 2012 < http://www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au/clean-energy-future/an-overview-of-the-clean-energy-legislative-package>.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government 2013, Clean energy future. Australian Government Clean Energy Future, viewed April 2013 < http://www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au/clean-energy-future/>.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J 1991, ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120.10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, M & Rondinelli, D 1998, ‘Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution’, The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C & Crawford, E 2012, ‘Influencing climate change policy the effect of shareholder pressure and firm environmental performance’, Business & Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 148–175.10.1177/0007650311427594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clean Energy Regulator 2012, Overview of the NGER scheme, Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator, viewed 18 June 2012 http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/National-Greenhouse-and-Energy-Reporting/About-NGER/overview-of-NGER/Pages/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, J & Najah, M 2012, ‘Institutional investor influence on global climate change disclosure practices’, Australian Journal of Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 169–187.10.1177/0312896211423945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlmann, F & Brammer, 2011, ‘Exploring and explaining patterns of adaptation and selection in corporate environmental strategy in the USA’, Organization Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 527–553.10.1177/0170840611403670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlmann, F, Brammer, S & Millington, A 2008, ‘Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: implications for business and public policy’, Journal of General Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte 2011, CDP Australia and New Zealand Report 2011 – A two speed business response to climate change, Carbon Disclosure Project, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, J & Stubbs, W 2012, ‘Corporate carbon strategies and greenhouse gas emission assessments: the implications of scope 3 emission factor selection’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 412–422.10.1002/bse.1734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, D, Griffiths, A & Benn, S 2007, Organizational change for corporate sustainability: a guide for leaders and change agents of the future, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Esty, D & Charnovitz, S 2012, ‘Green rules to drive innovation’, Harvard Business Review, vol. March, pp. 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, R & Kaplan, S 2001, ‘Creative destruction’, The McKinsey Quarterly, vol. 3, pp. 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, G & Martinov-Bennie, N 2010, Sustainability reporting assurance: market trends and information content, CPA Australia Ltd, Southbank, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R 2008. ‘Australia's emissions in a global context’, in The garnaut climate change review, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G & Prahalad, C 2005, ‘Strategic intent’, Harvard Business Review, vol. July-August, pp. 148–161.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S 1995, ‘A natural-resource-based view of the firm’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 986–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S & Sharma, S 2004, ‘Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination’, The Academy of Management Executive, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–18.10.5465/AME.2004.12691227
   Google Scholar
• Håkanson, L 2007, ‘Creating knowledge: the power and logic of articulation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 51–88.10.1093/icc/dtl033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S 2003, ‘The seduction of best practice: commentary on “Taking Strategy Seriously”’, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 12, no.4, pp. 410–413.10.1177/1056492603258970
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J, Steffen, I & Kronley, C 2012, ‘Cultural change that sticks’, Harvard Business Review, vol. July-August, pp. 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, S & Tushman, M 1993, ‘Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1314–1344.10.2307/256813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, A 2008, ‘Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 18, pp. 1–15.10.1002/bse.511
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A & Pinske, J 2004, ‘Market strategies for climate change’, European Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 304–314.10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A & Levy, D 2001, ‘Winds of change: corporate strategy, climate change and oil multinationals’, European Management Journal, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 501–509.10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A, Levy, D & Pinkse, J 2008, ‘Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure’, European Accounting Review, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 719–745.10.1080/09638180802489121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R, Fabish, L & McGaw, N 2005, ‘The value of corporate values’, Strategy + Business, vol. 39, no. Spring, pp.1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S 2012, ‘Corporate carbon strategies in responding to climate change’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 21, pp. 33–48.10.1002/bse.711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall, C & Beck, T 2005, ‘Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: how organizations respond to environmental change’, Journal of Management, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 738–757.10.1177/0149206305279367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M & Griffiths, A 2010, ‘Beyond adaptation: resilience for business in light of climate change and weather extremes’, Business & Society, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 477–511.10.1177/0007650310368814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M, Griffiths, A & Winn, M 2012, ‘Extreme weather events and the critical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 17–32.10.1002/bse.708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G 2009, ‘Market-based policy options to control US greenhouse gas emissions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 5–27.10.1257/jep.23.2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A 1982, ‘Adapting to environmental jolts’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 515–537.10.2307/2392528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S 2005, ‘Knowledge transfer and learning: problems of knowledge transfer associated with trying to short-circuit the learning cycle’, Journal of Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I 2007, ‘The knowledge-creating company’, Harvard Business Review, vol. July-August, pp. 162–171.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, C, Harreld, JB & Tushman, ML 2009, ‘Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities’, California Management Review, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 75–99.10.2307/41166506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okereke, C 2007, ‘An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: the UK FTSE 100’, European Management Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 475–486.10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Okereke, C & Russell, RD 2010, ‘Regulatory pressure and competitive dynamics: carbon management strategies of UK energy-intensive companies’, California Management Review, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 100–124.10.1525/cmr.2010.52.4.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okereke, C, Wittneben, B & Bowen, F 2012, ‘Climate change: challenging business, transforming politics’, Business & Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–30.10.1177/0007650311427659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsato, R 2006, ‘Competitive environmental strategies’, California Management Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 127–143.10.2307/41166341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, K & Reinhardt, F 2000, ‘What every executive needs to know about global warming’, Harvard Business Review, vol. July-August, pp. 129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzey, J & Jotzo, F 2012, ‘Tax-versus-trading and efficient revenue recycling as issues for greenhouse gas abatement’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 64, pp. 230–236.10.1016/j.jeem.2012.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Pinkse, J 2005, ‘A challenge for the 21st century? Emissions trading and corporate climate strategies’, Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. August, pp. 1–6.10.5465/AMBPP.2005.18783307
   Google Scholar
• Pinske, J & Kolk, A 2012, ‘Addressing the climate change – sustainable development nexus: the role of multistakeholder partnerships’, Business & Society, vol. 51, pp. 176–210.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, D, Baker, L, Beck, T, Kulkarni, M, Solansky, S & Travis, D 2007, ‘Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 515–543.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M & Reinhardt, F 2007, ‘A strategic approach to climate’, Harvard Business Review, vol. October, pp. 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Post, J & Altman, B 1994, ‘Managing the environmental change process: barriers and opportunities’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 64–81.10.1108/09534819410061388
   Google Scholar
• Qantas 2012, Sustainable Aviation Fuel and Qantas, viewed 18 June 2012 <http://www.qantas.com.au/travel/airlines/sustainable-aviation-fuel/global/en>
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, JE 2011, ‘The CEO of duke energy on learning to work with green activists’, Harvard Business Review, vol. May, pp. 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sharfman, M, Shaft, T & Anex, R 2009, ‘The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–13.10.1002/bse.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sine, W & David, R 2003, ‘Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the IS electricity industry’, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 185–207.10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C 1994, ‘The merlin factor: leadership and strategic intent’, Business Strategy Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67–84.10.1111/j.1467-8616.1994.tb00070.x
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, F & Oliva, R 2005, ‘Environmental change and organizational transformation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1017–1041.10.1093/icc/dth078
   Google Scholar
• Voss, G, Sirdeshmukh, D & Voss, Z 2008, ‘The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–19.10.5465/AMJ.2008.30767373
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K & Quinn, R 1999, ‘Organizational change and development’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 361–386.10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhofer, G & Busch, T 2013, ‘Corporate strategies for managing climate risks’, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wellstein, B & Kieser, A 2011, ‘Trading “best practices” – a good practice?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 683–719.10.1093/icc/dtr011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar