Comparing cyclic behaviour of RBS, DFC and proposed rigid connections in a steel moment frame with CFT column

References

• AISC. 2005. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).
   Google Scholar
• Belarbi, A., and T. T. Hsu. 1995. “Constitutive Laws of Softened Concrete in Biaxial Tension Compression.” Structural Journal 92 (5): 562–573.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. J. 1996. “A Simple and Effective Retrofit Method for Steel Beam to Column Connections”, Seventh US Japan Workshop on the Improvement Structural Design and Construction Practices, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• El-Tawil, S., T. Mikesell., E. Vidarsson., and S. K. Kunnath., (1998). “ Strength and Ductility of FR Welded-bolted Connection”,SAC Report 98-1.sacramento,calif ., SAC Joint Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, M. D., T. Winneberger, A. J. Zekany, and T. J. Potyraj. 1996. The Dogbone Connection: Part 11. Modern Steel Construction, Vol 36, No.1. Chicago, lllinois: American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Erfani, S., and V. Akrami. 2017. “Increasing Seismic Energy Dissipation of Steel Moment Frames Using Reduced Web Section (RWS) Connection.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (7): 1090–1112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1210057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, H., F. Danesh, and S. Eshghi. 2009. “A Modified Moment Resisting Connection for Ductile Steel Frames (Numerical and Experimental Investigation).” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65 (10–11): 2040–2049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. 1996. “Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).” Experimental Investigation of Steel Beam to Column Subassemblages, FEMA −1996-01 .Part 1.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA- 350. 2000. “Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment – Frame Buildings”, Prepared by SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington,DC.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA −355 D. 2000. “State of Art Report on Connection Performance.”, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA-351. 2001. Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment Frame Buildings. Washington,DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA-353. 2000. “Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment Frame Construction for Seismic Applications.”, Prepared by SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. K., Z. Tao, and U. Katwal. 2020. “Behavior of through Plate Connections to Concrete-filled Stainless Steel Columns.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 171: 106142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, A. L., and E. Fehlinga. 2017. “Numerical Analysis of Circular Steel Tube Confined UHPC Stub Columns.” Computers and Concrete 19 (3): 263–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamasbi., H., A. R. Mardookhpour, and Sanaei. 2011. “Cyclic Behavior of Double I-beams RBS Connections.” 6th International Conference on seismology and Earthquake Engineering. Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Jiaru., Q., Y. Haiqum., Y. Feng., D. Hai ., L. Jianhua ., and L. Yueming. 2005. “Experimental Study on Full- Scale Steel Beam to Column Moment Connections.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0015-x.
   Google Scholar
• Le Hoang, A., and E. Fehling. 2017a. “Numerical Study of Circular Steel Tube Confined Concrete (STCC) Stub Columns.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 136: 238–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.020 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Hoang, A. & Fehling, E. 2017b. Numerical analysis of circular steel tube confined UHPC stub columns. Computers and Concrete, 19(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.263 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.263
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., Han, S. E., Noh, S. Y., & Shin, S. W. 2007. Deformation capacity of reduced beam section moment connection by staggered holes. In International conference on sustainable building, Seoul, Korea
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., S. E. Han, S. Y. Noh, and S. W. Shin. 2007. “Deformation Capacity of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connection by Staggered Holes”. In International conference on sustainable building, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical Stress-strain Model for Confined Concrete.” Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8): 1804–1826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, JB. Priestley, MJ. Park, R. 1998. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete”. Journal of structural engineering. 114(8):1804–26
   Google Scholar
• Mao, W-J., Wang, W-D., & Xian, W. 2020, December. Numerical analysis on fire performance of steel-reinforced concrete-filled steel tubular columns with square cross-section. Structures (Vol. 28 Vol. 28 28, pp. 1–16), Elsevier doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.043
   Google Scholar
• Montuori, R., and V. Sagarese. 2018. “The Use of Steel Rbs to Increase Ductility of Wooden Beams.” Engineering Structures 169: 154–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvari, A., S. M. Zahrai, S. M. Mirhosseini, and E. Zeighami. 2020. “Numerical and Experimental Study on the Behavior of Drilled Flange Steel Beam to CFT Column Connections.” Structures, Vol. 28, 726–740. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Plumier, A. 1990. “New Idea for Safe Structures in Seismic Zones”. In IABSE Symposium-Mixed Structures Including New Materials. Brussels, Belgium: University of Liege
   Google Scholar
• Popovics, S. 1973. “A Numerical Approach to the Complete Stress-strain Curve of Concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research 3 (5): 583–599.
   Google Scholar
• Roudsari, M. T., and S. H. Moradi. 2018. “Experimental and Numerical Assessment of Reduced IPE Beam Sections Connections with Box-Stiffener.” International Journal of Steel Structures 18 (1): 255–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0319-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, A., S. R. Mirghaderi, and S. M. Zahrai. 2016. “Cyclic Testing of Tubular Web RBS Connections in Deep Beams.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 117: 214–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, K. J., Y. J. Kim, and Y. S. Oh. 2008. “Seismic Behaviour of Composite Concrete-filled Tube Column-to-beam Moment Connections.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 64 (1): 118–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. C., and C. Y. Chen. 1996, June. “Performance of Ductile Steel Beam-column Moment Connections”. In 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper N. Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• Uang, C. M., Q. S. K. Yu, S. Noel, and J. Gross. 2000. “Cyclic Testing of Steel Moment Connections Rehabilitated with RBS or Welded Haunch.” Journal of Structural Engineering 126 (1): 57–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(57).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajdian, M., A. Parvari, and M. Afzali. 2020. “Improvement of Seismic Performance of Beam-column Connection with Replaceable Drilled Attachment Parts.” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. doi:https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.15239.
   Google Scholar
• Vetr, M., M. Miri, and A. Haddad. 2012. “Seismic Behavior of a New Reduced Beam Section Connection by Drilled Holes Arrangement (RBS_DHA) on the Beam Flanges through Experimental Studies”. In 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Zahrai, S. M., Mirghaderi, S. R. and Saleh, A. 2017. “Increasing Plastic Hinge Length Using Two Pipes in a Proposed Web Reduced Beam Section, an Experimental and Numerical Study.” Steel and Composite Structures 23 (4): 421–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.4.421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar