Agile approach to accelerate product development using an MVP framework

References

• Beck, K., M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, and W. Cunningham, ( Producer). (2001a). “Manifesto for Agile Software Development.” agile manifesto. Retrieved from https://agilemanifesto.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, K., M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, and W. Cunningham, ( Producer). (2001b). “Principles Behind the Agile Manifesto. Agile Manifesto.” Retrieved from https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html.
   Google Scholar
• Castelle, K. M., and E. Dario 2019. “Knowledge Exchange Mechanisms in Agile Environments for Globally Outsourced Teams.” Paper presented at the Industrial and Systems Engineering Conference, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
   Google Scholar
• Castelle, K. M., A. W. Dean, and C. B. Daniels. 2019. “Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Agile Development in Modular Shipbuilding.” Naval Engineers Journal 131 (2): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488388.2016.1238025.2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, E. J., T. H. Holzer, T. J. Eveleigh, and S. Sarkani. 2015. “The Effects of System Prototype Demonstrations on Weapon Systems.” Defense ARJ 22 (1): 106–134.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, B. 2020. “How to Build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP): The 2020 Guide.” Deviation to Minimum Viable Capability (MVC). https://dev.to/bencurtis/how-to-build-a-minimum-viable-product-mvp-the-2020-guide-3m4m.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. H., E. Y. Nakagawa, and R. P. dos Santos 2021, September. “Reliability in Software-Intensive Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Perspectives.” Paper presented at the 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Palermo, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. 2023. “Best Practices for Addressing New Challenges in Testing and Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Enabled Systems. Insight 23 (1): 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12281.
   Google Scholar
• GAO. 2018. Weapon Systems Cybersecurity: DOD Just Beginning to Grapple with Scale of Vulnerabilities. Retrieved from Washington: U.S Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• GAO (, U. S. G. A. O). (2020). “Assessment Guide Technology Readiness: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects.” (GAO-20-48G). Online: U.S. GAO Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-48g.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gorod, A., L. Hallo, V. Ireland, and I. Gunawan, Eds., A. Gorod, L. Hallo, V. Ireland, & I. Gunawan. 2019. Evolving Toolbox for Complex Project Management. Boca Raton, Florida: Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429197079.
   Google Scholar
• Haughey, D. 2009 Waterfall V Agile: How Should I Approach My Software Development Project? http://www.projectsmart.com/articles/waterfall-vagile-how-should-i-approach-my-softwaredevelopment-project.php
   Google Scholar
• Hooda, S., S. Hooda, V. M. Sood, Y. Singh, S. Dalal, and M. Sood. 2023. Agile Software Development : Trends, Challenges and Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119896838.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, A., and S. Smith 2023. National Defence, Defence Strategic Review. Canberra: Australian Government Retrieved from https://www.defence.gov.au/about/reviews-inquiries/defence-strategic-review.
   Google Scholar
• ICCPM. (2023). “What is Complexity?.” Retrieved from https://iccpm.com/about-complex-project-management/.
   Google Scholar
• INCOSE), I. C. o. S. E. 2021. “Systems Engineering Vision 2035: Engineering Solutions for a Better World.” Retrieved from Online. https://www.incose.org/2023_redesign/publications/se-vision-2035.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T., G. T. Hutto, J. R. Simpson, and D. C. Montgomery. 2012. “Designed Experiments for the Defense Community.” Quality Engineering 24 (1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.627288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, K. F., and M. G. Tutty. 2018. “A Tale of Two Allied Defence Departments: New Assurance Initiatives for Managing Increasing System Complexity, Interconnectedness and Vulnerability.” Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering 14 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488388.2018.1426407.
   Google Scholar
• Katina, P. F., A. Tolk, C. B. Keating, and K. F. Joiner. 2020. “Modeling and Simulation in Complex System Governance.” International Journal of System of Systems Engineering 10 (3): 262–292. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSE.2020.109739.
   Google Scholar
• Knaster, R., and D. Leffingwell. 2018. SAFe 4.5 Distilled: Applying the Scaled Agile Framework for Lean Software and Systems Engineering. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Larman, C., and B. Vodde. 2008. Scaling Lean & Agile Development: Thinking and Organizational Tools for Large-Scale Scrum. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Lednicky, E. J., and R. T. Silvestrini. 2013. “Quantifying Gains Using the Capability-Based Test and Evaluation Method.” Quality Reliability Engineering International 29 (1): 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., C. D. Wickens, Y. Liu, and L. N. Boyle. 2017. Designing for People: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. 3rd ed. ed. Charleston, S.C., United States: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Letícia, M. V. 2016. “Project Agile Management for Software Development: A Comparative Study on the Applicability of Scrum Together with Pmbok And/Or Prince2.” Revista De Gestão e Projetos 7 (3): 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfi, M. 2019. “Which Practices are Lean, Agile and Resilient? Literature Review and practitioners’ Perspective.” International Journal of Advanced Operations Management 11 (1/2): 142–170. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAOM.2019.098522.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevan, L., W. J. Ketinger, and T. O. Meservy. 2015. “Running on Hybrid: Control Changes When Introducing an Agile Methodology in a Traditional “Waterfall” System Development Environment.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 36:77–103. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 1991. Rapid Application Development. USA: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, M. 2019. “A Correlational Study on Project Management Methodology and Project Success.” Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management 9 (2): 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, M. S., M. A. Lapham, S. Miller, T. Chick, and I. Ozkaya 2013. Parallel Worlds: Agile and Waterfall Differences and Similarities. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. W., N. Parsons, and F. Isharyanto 2015. “Inclusion of Strategic Management Theories to Project Management.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 8 (3): 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-11-2014-0079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peever, D., R. Hill, P. Leahy, J. McDowell, and L. Tanner. 2015. First Principles Review: Creating One Defence. Australia: Canberra. https://www.defence.gov.au/about/reviews-inquiries/first-principles-review-creating-one-defence.
   Google Scholar
• Phatak, O. 2012. Waterfall vs. agile model comparison. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/waterfall-model-vsagile.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, E. 2009. Minimum Viable Product: A Guide. Startup Lessons Learned. http://www.startuplessonslearned.com/2009/08/minimum-viable-product-guide.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, A. 2014. “Improving Statistical Rigor in Defense T&E: Use of Tolerance Intervals in Designed Experiments.” Defense ARJ 21 (4): 804–824.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, D. E., and A. J. Connolly. 2020. “An Agile Framework for Teaching with Scrum in the IT Project Management Classroom.” Journal of Information Systems Education 31 (3): 196–207.
   Google Scholar
• Saynisch, M. 2010. “Mastering Complexity and Changes in Projects, Economy, and Society via Project Management Second Order (PM-2).” Project Management Journal 41 (5): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strain, J., and J. Lujan 2022. Actuating Thru Agile – an Incremental Test Approach. Paper presented at the 39th International Test &Evaluation Symposium, Virginia Beach, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Thesing, T., C. Feldmann, and M. Burchardt. 2021. “Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project.” Procedia Computer Science 181:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227.
   Google Scholar
• Tolk, A., P. Barry, and S. C. Doskey. 2022. “Using Modeling and Simulation and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Complex Adaptive Systems Engineering.” International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing 13 (2): 2241004.2241001–2241019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962322410045.
   Google Scholar
• Tomeny, T. E. 2015. Test & Evaluation’s Role in Breaking the Development Cost Curve. Paper presented at the ITEA.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J., and D. Patt 2022. Software Defines Tactics: Structuring Military Software Acquisitions for Adaptability and Advantage in a Competitive Era. Retrieved from Online: https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/software-defines-tactics-structuring-military-software-acquisitions.
   Google Scholar
• Wickert, D. 2019. “Test in the Age of Agile: Rising to the Challenge of Agile Software Development.” ITEA Journal 40 (2): 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G. 1996. “Thirty Years of Project Management What Have We Learned.” Paper presented at the British Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, Birmingham, UK, 8.127–8.145. UK: Aston Business School Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Yesudas, R., K. Castelle, K. F. Joiner, J. Bradley, and M. Efatmaneshnik. 2020. “Solving Tensions and Impacts of Overlapping Project Management and Systems Engineering with the Elegance of the Complex Systems Governance Approach.” International Journal of System of Systems Engineering 10 (2): 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSE.2020.109143.
   Google Scholar