Implementing pay-for-performance in primary health care: the role of institutional entrepreneurs

References

• Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22, 571–598. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effect of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137308160
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2017). How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis. Policy Sciences, 50, 217–239. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9261-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, T. (2010). A journey. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Bolitho, D. G. (1984). Some financial and medico-political aspects of the New Zealand medical profession’s reaction to the introduction of social security. New Zealand Journal of Health, 18, 34–49. Retrieved from http://www.nzjh.auckland.ac.nz/docs/1984/NZJH_18_1_04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burau, V., & Blank, R. (2006). Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8, 63–76. doi:10.1080/13876980500513558
   Google Scholar
• Burau, V., & Vranbaek, K. (2008). Institutions and non-linear change in governance. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 22, 350–367. doi:10.1108/14777260810893953
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44, 37–58. doi:10.1111/psj.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalisation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G. (1991). Australia compared. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Comptroller and Auditor General. (2008). NHS pay modernisation: New contracts for general practice services in England. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Comptroller and Auditor General. (2010). Tackling inequalities in life expectancy in areas with the worst health and deprivation. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, P. (2001). Policies for general practice. In P. Davis, & T. Ashton (Eds.), Health and public policy in New Zealand (pp. 201–218). Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranleigh Health. (2012). PHO performance programme evaluation. Auckland: Cranleigh Health.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist diversity and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286652.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P., & Ashton, T. (Eds.). (2000). Health policy and public policy in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, A., Khachatryan, A., Wallace, A., Peckham, S., Boyce, T., & Gillam, S. (2010). The quality and outcomes framework: Does it reduce health inequalities? Final report. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, T., & Roland, M. (2010). Lessons from major initiatives to improve primary care in the United Kingdom. Health Affairs, 29, 1023–1029. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0069
   Google Scholar
• Fougere, G. (1993). Struggling for control: The state and the medical profession in New Zealand. In F. W. Hafferty, & J. B. McKinlay (Eds.), The changing medical profession (pp. 115–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C. (1992). Health policy in Britain. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, E. (1980). The politics of social security. Wellington: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, I. (1989). The caring commodity. Wellington: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M. (1990). Institutions, veto points, and policy results: A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy, 10, 391–416. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00006061
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Peterson, H., Pierce, J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta Raney, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 13–36. doi:10.1111/psj.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2001). The primary health care strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, update edition, with an epilogue on health care (2nd ed.). London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. (2006). The new politics of the NHS (5th ed.). Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Kusi-Ampofo, O., Church, J., Conteh, C., & Heinmiller, B. T. (2015). Resistance and change: A multiple streams approach to understanding health policymaking in Ghana. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 40, 195–219. doi:10.1215/03616878-2854711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell-Smith, J. B. (1966). The New Zealand doctor and the welfare state. Auckland: Blackwood and Janet Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, L., & Mays, N. (1999). New Zealand’s independent practitioner associations: A working model of clinical governance in primary care? BMJ: British Medical Journal, 319, 1340–1342. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7221.1340
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (2008). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (p. 691). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Jenkins & Associates Ltd. (2008). Evaluation of the PHO performance programme. Wellington: Martin Jenkins & Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 649–667. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model & the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24, 459–482. doi:10.2307/3235165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NZLP. (1999). Labour on health. Wellington: New Zealand Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, C. (2003). A reality check: The early sector response to the primary health care strategy. Wellington: Wellington Independent Practitioners Association and Compass Health.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, T. R., & Paul-Shaheen, P. (1997). Translating ideas into actions: Entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22, 721–789. doi:10.1215/03616878-22-3-721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Harrison, S., Dowswell, G., Jerak-Zuiderent, S., & Bal, R. (2010). Performance regimes in health care: Institutions, critical junctures and the logic of escalation in England and the Netherlands. Evaluation, 16, 13–29. doi:10.1177/1356389009350026
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. (2007). A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy process. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 293–319). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2001). Public and private roles in health care systems. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Health. (2000). The NHS plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., & Eichbaum, C. (2008). Public policy in New Zealand. Auckland: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Mitton, C., Dowling, L., Hiltz, M. A., Campbell, M., & Gujar, S. A. (2016). Introducing new priority setting and resource allocation processes in a Canadian healthcare organisation: A case study analysis informed by multiple streams theory. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5, 23–31. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.169
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, A., Chapple, A., & Roland, M. (2000). The PRICCE project. Manchester, NH: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, A., Chapple, A., & Roland, M. (2001). What makes British general practitioners take part in a quality improvement scheme? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 6, 145–150. doi:10.1258/1355819011927396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens, S. (2004). Reform strategies for the English NHS. Health Affairs, 23, 37–44.10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, M., & Fosse, E. (2011). Tackling health inequalities in Norway: Applying linear and non-linear models in the policy-making process. Critical Public Health, 21, 373–381. doi:10.1080/09581596.2010.492210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuohy, C. H. (1999). Accidental logics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuohy, C. H. (2010). Paths of progress in healthcare reform: The scale and pace of change in four advanced nations. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tuohy, C. H. (2012a). Institutional entrepreneurs and the politics of redesigning the welfare state: The case of health care. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Tuohy, C. H. (2012b). Reform and the politics of hybridization in mature health care states. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 37, 611–632. doi:10.1215/03616878-1597448
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., & Leipold, S. (2016). Demolishing dikes: Multiple streams and policy discourse analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 108–129. doi:10.1111/psj.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 65–92). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar