Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change

References

• Ackrill, R., & Kay, A. (2011). Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Multiple streams and the EU policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887.10.1080/13501763.2013.781824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alimi, D. (2015). “Going global”: Policy entrepreneurship of the global commission on drug policy. Public Administration, 93(4), 874–889.10.1111/padm.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amable, B., Ernst, E., & Palombarini, S. (2005). How do financial markets affect industrial relations: An institutional complementarity approach. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 311–330.10.1093/SER/mwi013
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557675
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139087315
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2003). Who needs a review of the financial system in Australia? The case of the Wallis inquiry. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 511–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2005). The exoteric politics of bank mergers in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 51(2), 235–256.10.1111/ajph.2005.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2009a). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multi-level governance of central banking reform. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 22(4), 571–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2009b). The governance of financial regulatory reform: The Australian experience. Public Administration, 87(4), 910–922.10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions).10.1057/9781137308160
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. (2017). How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 217–239.10.1007/s11077-016-9261-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (in press). Institutional and policy change: Meta-theory and method. In C. Bakir & D. S. L. Jarvis (Eds.), Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., & Gallego, R. (2006). From ‘new institutionalism’ to ‘institutional processualism’: Advancing knowledge about public management policy change. Governance, 19(4), 531–557.10.1111/gove.2006.19.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511596605
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2011). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221–227.10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2012). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Heikkila, T. (2014). A comparison of theories of the policy process. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 363–389). Chicago, IL: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37–58.10.1111/psj.v44.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2011). The US financial crisis: Lessons for theories of institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 211–234.10.1093/ser/mwq034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G. (2009). Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 7–31.10.1080/13876980802648284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, D., & Ingold, K. (2015). Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making. European Political Science Review, 7(3), 475–498.10.1017/S1755773914000277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, J. M. (2008). Normative change from within: The international monetary fund’s approach to capital account liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 129–158.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2010). Complementarity. In G. Morgan, J. L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 117–137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1978). Modern political economy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1976). New rules for sociological method. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, A. (2017). Policy entrepreneurship and policy formulation. In M. Howlett, and I. Ishani Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 265–282). Cheltendam: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781784719326
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., McConnell, A., & Perl, A. (2015). Streams and stages: Reconciling Kingdon and policy process theory. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 419–434.10.1111/ejpr.2015.54.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., McConnell, A., & Perl, A. (2016). Moving policy theory forward: Connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Raney, H. L., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13–36.10.1111/psj.v44.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161–187.10.1177/014920639902500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.10.2307/20159610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2008). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetoswn University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60, 126–148.10.2307/2648004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (1997). Escaping the joint‐decision trap: Repetition and Sectoral politics in the European union. West European Politics, 20(2), 22–36.10.1080/01402389708425189
   Google Scholar
• Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 239–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N., & King, P. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.
   Google Scholar
• Sætren, H. (2016). From controversial policy idea to successful program implementation: The role of the policy entrepreneur, manipulation strategy, program design, institutions and open policy windows in relocating Norwegian central agencies. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 71–88.10.1007/s11077-016-9242-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2016). Do crises lead to policy change? The multiple streams framework and the European Union’s economic governance instruments. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 35–53.10.1007/s11077-015-9239-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008a). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008b, August 27). From historical institutionalism to discursive institutionalism: Explaining change in comparative political economy. Paper prepared for presentation at the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2011). Reconciling ideas and institutions through discursive institutionalism. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., & Creed, D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.10.1111/padm.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, T., & Öberg, P. (2005). How are coordinated market economies coordinated? Evidence from Sweden. West European Politics, 28(5), 1075–1100.10.1080/01402380500311830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, M. (1992). Ideas and the politics of bounded innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics (pp. 188–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., & Exadaktylos, T. (2016). Policies that succeed and programs that fail: Ambiguity, conflict, and crisis in Greek higher education. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 59–82.10.1111/psj.v44.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar