Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance

References

• Allen, C. R., & Garmestani, A. S. (Eds.). (2015). Adaptive management of social-ecological systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8
   Google Scholar
• Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, A. M. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asseng, S. (2013). Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 627–632.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1980). Effective choice in the prisoner’ s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2001). The history of the global climate change regime. In U. Luterbacher & D. F. Sprinz (Eds.), International relations and global climate change (pp. 23–40). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., Heuvelink, G. B., & Refsgaard, J. C. (2005). An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data. Water Science and Technology, 52(6), 153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Henriksen, H. J., & Van der Keur, P. (2011). More is not always better: Coping with ambiguity in natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(1), 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2008). Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: About knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., Tagg, A., Keil, F., & Lange, W. J. (2006). Uncertainty matters: Computer models at the science–policy interface. Water Resources Management, 21(7), 1075–1090.
   Google Scholar
• Buurman, J., & Babovic, V. (2016). Adaptation pathways and real options analysis: An approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies. Policy and Society, 35(2), 137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buytaert, W., Vuille, M., Dewulf, A., Urrutia, R., Karmalkar, A., & Célleri, R. (2010). Uncertainties in climate change projections and regional downscaling in the tropical Andes: Implications for water resources management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(7), 1821–1848.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 531–582.
   Google Scholar
• Cigler, A. J., & Loomis, B. A. (2011). Interest group politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning, J., Winkel, G., Sotirov, M., Blondet, M., Borras, L., Ferranti, F., & Geitzenauer, M. (2014). Natura 2000 and climate change-Polarisation, uncertainty, and pragmatism in discourses on forest conservation and management in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 39, 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Craps, M., Bouwen, R., Taillieu, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2005). Integrated management of natural resources: Dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Science and Technology, 52(6), 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., François, G., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2007). A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration : Experiences from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology And Society, 12(2), article 14.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R. J., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Mancero, M., Cardenas, G., & Sucozhanay, D. (2011). Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döll, P., & Romero-Lankao, P. (2016). How to embrace uncertainty in participatory climate change risk management - a roadmap. Earth’s Future. doi:10.1002/2016EF000411
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & van Meerkerk, I. (2015). Connective capacity in water governance practices: The meaning of trust and boundary spanning for integrated performance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 25–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture: Social movements, protest, and contention (pp. 85–106). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2007). Frame-based intervention for promoting understanding in multiparty conflicts Barbara Gray. In T. Taillieu (Ed), Inside networks : A process view on multi-organisational partnerships, alliances and networks (pp. 223–250). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & Ter Maat, J. (2013). Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, S., & Susskind, L. E. (2013). Water Diplomacy. doi:10.1038/461472a.1/31/12
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, P. H. M., Petersen, A. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Risbey, J. S., & Ravetz, J. R. (2005). A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties. Water Science and Technology, 52(6), 125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Wu, X. (2016). Embracing uncertainty in policy-making: The case of the water sector. Policy and Society, 35(2), 115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. A network approach to problem solving and decision making. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kort, E. A., Wofsy, S. C., Daube, B. C., Diao, M., Elkins, J. W., Gao, R. S., … Zondlo, M. A. (2012). Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north. Nature Geoscience, 5(5), 318–321.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & Marchau, V. A. W. J. (2010). Classifying and communicating uncertainties in model-based policy analysis. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 10(4), 299.
   Google Scholar
• Langbein, L. I., & Kerwin, C. M. (2000). Regulatory negotiation versus conventional rule making: Claims, counterclaims, and empirical evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3), 599–632.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31(5), 931–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2006). A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Management Science, 52(4), 514–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luetge, C., & Mukerji, N. (Eds.). (2016). Order ethics: An ethical framework for the social market economy. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33151-5
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, B., & Mehta, J. (1997). Contracts, opportunism and trust: Self-interest and social orientation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21, 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuura, M., & Schenk, T. (2016). Joint fact-finding in urban planning and environmental disputes. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., & Moore, H. (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4), 420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2015). Climate politics: Designing energy policy under uncertainty. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 517–518.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2017). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy & Politics, 45(1), 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (2003). Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 493–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Elinor Ostrom: Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. 12(2), article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., Jeffrey, P., Aerts, J., Berkamp, G., & Cross, K. (2007). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology And Society, 12(2), article 30.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2016). Comparative governance: Rediscovering the functional dimension of governing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petr, M., Boerboom, L. G. J., Ray, D., & van der Veen, A. (2015). New climate change information modifies frames and decisions of decision makers: An exploratory study in forest planning. Regional Environmental Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0827-9
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., & Laing, A. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology And Society, 14(4), r1.
   Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J. C., Nilsson, B., Brown, J., Klauer, B., Moore, R., Bech, T., … Biza, P. (2005). Harmonised techniques and representative river basin data for assessment and use of uncertainty information in integrated water management (HarmoniRiB). Environmental Science and Policy, 8(3 SPEC. ISS.), 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and networks approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, G., & Glasbergen, P. (2012). Private multi-stakeholder governance in the agricultural market place : An analysis of legitimization processes of the roundtables on sustainable palm oil and responsible soy. International Food and Agribusiness Review, 15(Special Issue B), 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Seitanidi, M., & Crane, A. (2014). Social partnerships and responsible business. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sigel, K., Klauer, B., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: The example of the EU water framework directive. Ecological Economics, 69, 502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S. O., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J. R., & Risbey, J. (2005). Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment : The NUSAP system. Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 25(2), 481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, W., Kwakkel, J. H., Mens, M., van der Sluijs, J., Stemberger, S., Wardekker, A., & Wildschut, D. (2015). Dealing with uncertainties in fresh water supply: Experiences in the Netherlands. Water Resources Management. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1198-1
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sorensen, E. (2012). Interactive Governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (2010). Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 386–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 13(2), 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hoek, R. E., Brugnach, M., Mulder, J. P. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2014). Analysing the cascades of uncertainty in flood defence projects: How “not knowing enough” is related to “knowing differently.”. Global Environmental Change, 24, 373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Pelt, S. C., Haasnoot, M., Arts, B., Ludwig, F., Swart, R., & Biesbroek, R. (2015). Communicating climate (change) uncertainties: Simulation games as boundary objects. Environmental Science and Policy, 45, 41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E., Harremoes, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Von Krauss, M. P. K. (2003). Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Jeuland, M., & Whittington, D. (2016). Does political uncertainty affect water resources development? The case of the Eastern Nile. Policy and Society, 35(2), 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1998). Institutional uncertainties in international fisheries management. Fisheries Research, 37(1–3), 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar