Designing policy robustness: outputs and processes

References

• Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderies, J. M., Rodriguez, A. A., Janssen, M. A., & Cifdaloz, O. (2007). Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15194–15199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auping, W., Pruyt, E., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2015). Societal ageing in The Netherlands: A robust system dynamics approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Sciences, 32(4), 485–501.
   Google Scholar
• Bakvis, H. (2000). Rebuilding policy capacity in the era of the fiscal dividend: A report from Canada. Governance, 13(1), 71–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankes, S. C. (1993). Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Operations Research, 4(3), 435–449.
   Google Scholar
• Bankes, S. C., Walker, W. E., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Exploratory modeling and analysis. In S. Gass & M. C. Fu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of operations research and management science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barrieu, P., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2006). On precautionary policies. Management Science, 52(8), 1145–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, J. (2009). The robust federation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, J. (2016). Robust institutional design: What makes some institutions more adaptable and resilient to changes in the their environment than others? In D. S. Wilson & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution: A new synthesis for economic (pp. 167–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2000). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhave, A. G., Conway, D., Dessai, S., & Stainforth, D. A. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for robust decision making approaches to support climate change adaptation in the developing world. Climate Risk Management, 14, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bixler, R. P. (2014). From community forest management to polycentric governance: Assessing evidence from the bottom up. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 27(2), 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W. (2009). Multi-level governance and natural resource management: The challenges of complexity, diversity, and uncertainty. In V. Beckmann & M. Padmanabhan (Eds.), Institutions and Sustainability (pp. 109–126). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Science1Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. (2006). Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 75–96). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Storrøsten, H. B. (2017). Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage. Journal of Public Economics, 149, 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callo-Concha, D., & Ewert, F. (2014). Using the concepts of resilience, vulnerability and adaptability for the assessment and analysis of agricultural systems. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2015a). Varieties of governance: Dynamics, strategies and capacities. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015b). Bringing governments back in: Governance and governing in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(4), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., Regini, M., & Turri, M. (2016). Changing governance in Universities. The Italian case in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal (with JJ. Woo). Policy Sciences, 50(3), 399–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Agility and Robustness as Design Criteria. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Policy Design pp. 420–434 London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. M., & Doyle, J. (2002). Complexity and robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl 1), 2538–2545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, T. (2015). How macroprudential financial regulation can save neoliberalism. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(2), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, A., & Ireland, V. (2014). Preparing for complex interdependent risks: A system of systems approach to building disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 9, 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermack, T. J. (2004). Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures, 36(3), 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S. (2015). An overview of macroprudential policy tools. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 397–422.
   Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., Kose, M. M. A., Laeven, M. L., & Valencia, F. (2014). Financial crises: Causes, consequences, and policy responses. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadson, S., Hall, J., Garrick, D., Sadoff, C., Grey, D., & Whittington, D. (2016). Water security, risk and economic growth: Lessons from a dynamical systems model. Presented at the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 14973.
   Google Scholar
• Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Servén, L. (2010). Are all the sacred cows dead? Implications of the financial crisis for macro- and financial policies. The World Bank Research Observer, 25(1), 91–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K., & Yuan, L. (2013). Towards evidence-driven policy design: Complex adaptive systems and computational modeling. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1983). Don’t toss coins in garbage cans: A prologue to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 3(4), 345–367.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., Greaker, M., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2014). Robust policies against emission leakage: The case for upstream subsidies. CESifo Working Paper, Working Paper No. 4742.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Galea, N., Powell, A., Loosemore, M., & Chappell, L. (2015). Designing robust and revisable policies for gender equality: Lessons from the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 33(5–6), 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gober, P., Quay, R., & Larson, K. L. (2016). Outdoor water use as an adaptation problem: Insights from North American cities. Water Resources Management, 30(3), 899–912.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. (Ed.). (1998). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greener, I. (2002). Agency, social theory and social policy. Critical Social Policy, 22(4), 688–705.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, D. G., & Lempert, R. J. (2007). A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., & Rentschler, J. (2015). Risk management for development— Assessing obstacles and prioritizing action. Risk Analysis, 35(2), 193–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hamarat, C., Kwakkel, J. H., & Pruyt, E. (2013). Adaptive robust design under deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 408–418.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. C., Thekdi, S. A., Jenicek, E. M., Harmon, R. S., Goodsite, M. E., Case, M. P., … Lambert, J. H. (2013). Case studies of scenario analysis for adaptive management of natural resource and infrastructure systems. Environment Systems & Decisions, 33(1), 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, T. H. (2007). Why is the intelligence community so difficult to redesign? SmartPractices, conflicting goals, and the creation of purpose-based organizations. Governance, 20(3), 401–422.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P. (2008). Governing at the leading edge: Black Swans, wild cards, and wicked problems. Speech by Head of Civil Service Peter Ho, Civil Service College: Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2014). From the “Old” to the “New” policy design: Beyond globalization and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(3), 225–249.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2017). Patching versus packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 112–127). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, T., & Perrings, C. (2012). Precaution and proportionality in the management of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, J., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Harrison, P. A., Omann, I., Dunford, R., Kammerlander, M., & Pataki, G. (2015). Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios. Climatic Change, 128(3–4), 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., Anderies, J. M., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Society and natural resources. Robustness of Socialecological Systems to Spatial and Temporal Variability, 20(4), 307–322.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, E. (2003). Stable or robust? What’s the difference? Complexity, 8(3), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, E. (Ed.). (2005). Robust design: A repertoire of biological, ecological, and engineering case studies (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenthaler, K. (2006). Policymaking in the European Central bank: The masters of Europe’s money. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Brown Little.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, S., Falebita, O. A., Akinbami, J.-F. K., & Akarakiri, J. B. (2016). System dynamics, uncertainty and hydrocarbon resources modelling: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, J. H., Eker, S., & Pruyt, E. (2016). How robust is a robust policy? Comparing alternative robustness metrics for robust decision-making. In M. Doumpos, C. Zopounidis, & E. Grigoroudis (Eds.), Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics (pp. 221–237). Basel: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, M. (1969). Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 346–358.
   Google Scholar
• Laski, K., & Podkaminer, L. (2012). The basic paradigms of EU economic policy-making need to be changed. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. L. (1997). Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 26(2), 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebel, L., Anderies, J., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson, P., & Subrick, J. R. (2006). Robust political economy. Review of Austrian Economics, 19(2–3), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2006). A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Management Science, 52(4), 514–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A. T., Wieland, V., & Williams, J. C. (1998). Robustness of simple monetary policy rules under model uncertainty. Rochester, NY: Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Reserve Board FEDS Paper No. 98–45.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A. T., & Williams, J. C. (2003). Robust monetary policy with competing reference models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(5), 945–975.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, P. (1986). The formulation of robust policies for rival rational expectations models of the economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 10(1), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, R. (2012). The governance of financial regulation: Reform lessons from the recent crisis. International Review of Finance, 12(1), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Low, B., Ostrom, E., Simon, C., & Wilson, J. (2003). Redundancy and diversity: Do they influence optimal management?”. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (eds), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 83–111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Houndmills: Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. (2003). Policy design and implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 223–233). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. (Ed.). (2000). Polycentric games and institutions: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mens, M. J. P., Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K. M., & van Beek, E. (2011). The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(8), 1121–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mietzner, D., & Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 1(2), 220–239.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, R., & Lerner, A. (1995). Bureaucracy, organizational redundancy, and the privatization of public services. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natali, D. (2008). Pensions in Europe, European Pensions. Bruxelles: PIE-Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in Metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, L., Dutschke, M., Streck, C., & Porrua, M. E. (2009). Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: The nested approach. Climate Policy, 9(2), 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1999). Organizing to reduce the vulnerabilities of complexity. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 7(3), 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S., & Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 358–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruyt, E. (2015). From building a model to adaptive robust decision making using systems modeling. In M. Janssen, M. A. Wimmer, & A. Deljoo (Eds.), Policy practice and digital science (pp. 75–93). Basel: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Room, G. (2011). Complexity, institutions and public policy: Agile decision-making in a turbulent world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. (1989). Studying institutions: Some lessons from the rational choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(1), 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2010). The black Swan: Second Edition: The impact of the highly improbable: With a new section: ‘On robustness and fragility’ (2nd ed.). New York,NY: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. B. (1999). The robustness and efficiency of monetary policy rules as guidelines for interest rate setting by the European central bank. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(3), 655–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, W. A. H., Kwakkel, J. H., Mens, M. J. P., van der Sluijs, J., & Stemberger, S. (2017). Dealing with uncertainties in fresh water supply: Experiences in the Netherlands. Water Resources Management, 31(2), 703–725.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, P. (1981). Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: A review of models and possible climatic applications. Toronto: Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. H., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–Ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E., Haasnoot, M., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Adapt or perish: A review of planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty. Sustainability, 5, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E., Rahman, S. A., & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. P., Lempert, R. J., Brown, C., Hall, J. A., Revell, D., & Sarewitz, D. (2013). Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: The value and demands of robust decision frameworks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, J. J., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Legitimation capacity: System-level resources and political skills in public policy. Policy & Society, 34(3–4), 271–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xun, W., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2017). Policy capacity and governance. assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yellen, J. L. (2011). Macroprudential supervision and monetary policy in the post-crisis world. Business Economics, 46(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, K., & Doyle, J. C. (1997). Essentials of robust control (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson.
   Google Scholar