1,824
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing health reform: studying tool appropriateness & critical capacities

&

References

  • Asher, M., & Bali, A. S. (2015). Public pension programs in southeast Asia: An assessment. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(2), 225–245.
  • Bali, A. S. (2016). Health system design and governance in India and Thailand. PhD Thesis Submitted to the National University of Singapore.
  • Bali, A. S., & Asher, M. G. (2012). Coordinating healthcare and pension policies: An exploratory study. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2015a). Health care reforms in India: Getting it wrong. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 300–319.
  • Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2015b). Mark time: India’s march to universal health care coverage. Social Policy & Administration, 49(6), 718–737.
  • Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Policy capacity: A design perspective. In Routledge handbook of policy design (pp. 331–344). Routledge.
  • Bali, AS., G. Capano, & M Ramesh. (Forthcoming). Anticipating and Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Policy & Society.
  • Bales, S. (2018). Evidence in Developing and Refining Capitation Payment for Health Care: The case of Vietnam (PhD Thesis). Singapore: National University of Singapore.
  • Bardach, E. (1980). Implementation studies and the study of implements. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). How solutions chase problems: Instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance, 29(3), 393–409.
  • Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (Eds.). (1998). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bhore, J. (1946). Report of the health survey and development committee. Report. New Delhi: Government of India.
  • Blomqvist, Å. (1997). Optimal non-linear health insurance. Journal of Health Economics, 16(3), 303–321.
  • Blomqvist, A. (2011). Public sector health care financing. In S. Glied & P. Smith (Eds.), The oxford handbook of health economics (pp. 257–284). Chippenham: Oxford University Press.
  • Bonilla-Chacín, M. E., & Aguilera, N. (2013). The mexican social protection system in health (Report, UNICO Studies Series #1). Washington, DC:World Bank
  • Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522.
  • Bredenkamp, C., Evans, T., Lagrada, L., Langenbrunner, J., Nachuk, S., & Palu, T. (2015). Emerging challenges in implementing universal health coverage in Asia. Social Science & Medicine, 145, 243–248.
  • Capano, G., & Lippi, A. (2017). How policy instruments are chosen: Patterns of decision makers’ choices. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 269–293.
  • Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Designing policy robustness: Outputs and processes. Policy and Society, 37(4), 422–440.
  • Carey, G., Kay, A., & Nevile, A. (2017). Institutional legacies and ‘Sticky Layers’: WhatHappens in cases of transformative policy change? Administration & Society.
  • Chindarkar, N., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2017). Conceptualizing effective social policy design: Design spaces and capacity challenges. Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 3–14.
  • Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., & Wise, L. R. (2002). Transforming administrative policy. Public Administration, 80(1), 153–179.
  • Coelho, V., & Shankland, A. (2011). Making the right to health a reality for Brazil’s indigenous peoples: Innovation. Decentralization And Equity, MEDICC Review, 13(3), 50–53.
  • Colebatch, H. K. (2018). The idea of policy design: intention, process, outcome, meaning an validity. Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), 365–383.
  • Del Río, P. (2018). Managing uncertainty: Controlling for conflicts in policy mixes. In Routledge handbook of policy design (pp. 404–419). Routledge.
  • Elmore, R. F. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 185–228.
  • Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC). (2017). Annual Report, 2016–17. New Delhi: ESIC
  • Feindt, P. H., & Flynn, A. (2009). Policy stretching and institutional layering: British food policy between security, safety, quality, health and climate change. British Politics, 4(3), 386–414.
  • Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713.
  • Gleeson, D., Legge, D., O’Neill, D., & Pfeffer, M. (2011, June). Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(3), 237–263.
  • Government of India. (2012). Rural health statistics in India in 2012. New Delhi: Ministry of Health.
  • Gupta, I., & Chowdhury, S. (2014). Public financing for health coverage in India: Who spends, who benefits, and at what cost? Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX, 59–63.
  • Peters, Guy B. (2002). The politics of tool choice. Chapter 19. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 562–564). Oxford University Press.
  • Hafner, T., & Shiffman, J. (2014). The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening. Health Policy and Planning, 28, 41–50.
  • Hanvoravongchai, P. (2013). Health financing reform in Thailand: Toward universal coverage under fiscal constraints (Report, UNICO Study Series #20). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Harimurti, P., Pambudi, E., Pigazzini, A., & Tandon, A. (2013). The nuts & bolts of jamkesmas, Indonesia’s Government-financed health coverage program for the poor and near-poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. London: Macmillan.
  • Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–144.
  • Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’to the ‘new’policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207.
  • Howlett, M. (2018). Matching policy tools and their targets: Beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 101–124.
  • Howlett, M. (2019). The policy design primer. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Howlett, M., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Designing for robustness: Surprise, agility and improvisation in policy design. Policy and Society, 37(4), 405-421.
  • Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33–46.
  • Howlett, M., & Del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245.
  • Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, doi:10.1177/0095399712459725.
  • Howlett, M., & Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(3), 225–249.
  • Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (Eds.). (2018). Routledge handbook of policy design. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Rayner, J. (2014). The elements of effective program design: A two-level analysis. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 1–12.
  • Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291–311.
  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1993). Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles,policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research, 12(1/2), 3–24.
  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles' heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.
  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2008). Studying public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
  • Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182.
  • Hsiao, W. C, & Shaw, P. W. (2007). Social health insurance for developing nations. World Bank Publications.
  • Jenkins, J. D. (2014). Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design? Energy Policy, 69, 467–477.
  • Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158.
  • Karan, A., Yip, W., & Mahal, A. (2017). Extending health insurance to the poor in India: An impact evaluation of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana on out of pocket spending for healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 83–92.
  • Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391.
  • Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 11–25.
  • Kirschen, E. S., Benard, J., Besters, H., Blackaby, F., Eckstein, O., Faaland, J., … Tosco, E. (1964). Economic policy in our time. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Kivimaa, P., & Virkamäki, V. (2014). Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 28–41.
  • Knaul, F. M., & Frenk, J. (2005). Health insurance in Mexico: achieving universal coverage through structural reform. Health Affairs, 24(6), 1467–1476.
  • La Forgia, G., & Nagpal, S. (2012). Government-sponsored health insurance in India : Are you covered? Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Langenbrunner, J. C., Cashin, C., & O’Dougherty, S. (2009). Designing and implementing health care provider payment systems: How-to manuals. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
  • Levi-Faur, D. (2014). The welfare state: a regulatory perspective. Public Administration, 92(3), 599-614.
  • Levy, S., & Schady, N. (2013). Latin America’s social policy challenge: Education, social insurance, redistribution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 193–218.
  • Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58.
  • Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1991). The logic of public policy design: Linking policy actors and plausible instruments. Knowledge in Society, 4, 125–151.
  • Liu, X. (2003). Policy tools for allocative efficiency of health services. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Lowi, T. J. (1966). Distribution, regulation, redistribution: The functions of government. Public Policies and Their Politics: Techniques of Government Control, 1966, 27–40. WW Norton New York.
  • Marten, R., McIntyre, D., Travassos, C., Shishkin, S., Longde, W., Reddy, S., & Vega, J. (2014). An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The Lancet, 384(9960), 2164–2171.
  • Maurya, D., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Program design, implementation and performance: The case of social health insurance in India. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1–22.
  • McKee, M., Balabanova, D., Basu, S., Ricciardi, W., & Stuckler, D. (2013). Universal health coverage: A quest for all countries but under threat in some. Value in Health, 16(1), S39–S45.
  • Mills, A. (2014). Health systems in low- and middle-income countries. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(6), 552–667.
  • Mohnen, P., & Röller, L.-H. (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49, 1431–1450.
  • Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Mukherjee, I., & Howlett, M. (2018). Gauging effectiveness: First and second-best policy design. In Routledge handbook of policy design (pp. 375–388). Routledge.
  • Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 43–57.
  • Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
  • Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Pitayarangsarit, S., & Tangcharoensathien, V. (2009). Sustaining capacity in health policy and systems research in Thailand. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(1), 72–74.
  • Preker, A. S., & Langenbrunner, J. C. (2005). Spending Wisely: Buying health services for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Preker, A. S., Liu, Z., Velenyi, E. V., & Baris, E. (2007). Public ends, private means: strategic purchasing of health services. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Radwan, I. India—private health services for the poor Radwan, I. (2005). Report, health. DC: World Bank: Nutrition and Population. Discussion Paper. Washington.
  • Ramesh, M. (2009). Healthcare reforms in Thailand: Rethinking conventional wisdom. In M. Ramesh (Ed.), TransforminG Asian Governance (pp. 164–177). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Ramesh, M. (2013). Health care reform in Vietnam: Chasing shadows. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(3), 399–412.
  • Rao, G., & Choudhury, M. (2012). Health care financing reforms in India. Report. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
  • Rao, S. (2015). Inter-state comparisons on health oucomes in major states and a framework for resource devolution for health. Report, Background Study for the 14th Finance Comission. New Delhi, India: Government of India.
  • Roberts, M., Hsiao, W., Berman, P., & Reich, M. (2004). Getting health reform right: A guide to improving performance and equity. New York: Routledge.
  • Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.
  • Ross, S. (2011). Collection of social contributions: Current practice and critical issues. In N. Takayama (Ed.), Priority challenges in pension administration. Tokyo: Maruzen.
  • Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance. doi:10.1111/gove.12084
  • Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2014). The innovativeness of national policy portfolios – climate policy change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 860–883.
  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529.
  • Somanathan, A., Dao, H. L., & Tien, T. V. (2013). Vietnam Integrating the poor into universal health coverage in Vietnam (Report, UNICO Studies Series #24). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Sovacool, B. K. (2008). The problem with the ‘portfolio approach’ in American energy policy. Policy Sciences, 41(3), 245–261.
  • Srinivasan, T. N. (2011). Growth, sustainability, and India’s economic reforms. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Tangcharoensathien, V., Limwattananon, S., Patcharanarumol, W., Thammatacharee, J., Jongudomsuk, P., & Sirilak, S. (2014). Achieving universal health coverage goals in Thailand: Thevital role of strategic purchasing. Health Policy and Planning 30(9), 1152-1161.
  • Tangcharoensathien, V., Suphanchaimat, R., Thammatacharee, N., & Patcharanarumol, W. (2012). Thailand’s universal health coverage scheme. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(8), 53.
  • Thomann, E. (2018). “Donate your organs, donate life!” Explicitness in policy instruments. Policy Sciences, 51(4), 433–456.
  • Tiernan, A., & Wanna, J. (2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Presented at the Govnet International Conference, Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Trebilcock, M., & Hartle, D. G. (1982). The choice of governing instrument. International Review of Law and Economics, 2, 29–46.
  • Vedung, E., Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., & Rist, R. C. (1997). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In E. Vedung, M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, & R. C. Rist (Eds.), Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Vega, J. (2013). Universal health coverage: The post-2015 development agenda. The Lancet, 381(9862), 179–180.
  • World Health Organization (2015). The kingdom of thailand health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 5(5). Available online at http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/208216. Accessed on Jan 18, 2019.
  • World Bank. (2018). World development indicators Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/
  • Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A framework for analysis. Policy and Society.